Most of the time what we get are competing narratives and all of them are misinformation. First one needs a standard for true information and a worldview that can ground it.
We make time for that! You aren't having a one-on-one conversation to persuade the other party, but rather a public discourse where the other party is actually a sockpuppet army whose collective goal is to persuade everyone reading.
I disagree with the always lose part. The sockpuppet account is definitely possible.
I think the biggest problem with spreading the truth is that most people can't handle it. Even "no nonsense" Adam Carolla said if it were true that 9/11 was an inside job he didn't want to know because it would mess up his perception of reality. Basically like "hey don't spoil my good time".
And like usual, some idiot comes in and tells me I should "do research" and stop being lazy.
What you encountered was one of the fake accounts that exists to make the readers believe--just by looking at the username--that there are a good number of people here who believe the Q hoax. Those are almost certainly sockpuppets.
a) Amount of energy implies one...for all is one in energy.
b) Suggested amount (to rise) tempts one to ignore that only during fall (inception towards death) can one rise (life).
c) Fall (motion) and Rise (matter) of energy.
d) Motion generates momentum for the production of matter.
e) Product (life) cannot refute/drive back generation (inception towards death)...it can be tricked to spend resistance on refuting other products aka selling self out; when buying into others.
f) Suggestion (information) becomes the inversion of perception (inspiration)...if one consents to it.
g) Suggested information tempts one to miss perceivable inspiration by ignoring/denying it. Suggested "misinformation" tempts one to ignore perceivable..."information tempts one to miss inspiration".
Furthermore...ones consent to suggested information establishes a conflict of reason against another, hence DIS-information aka a division among form.
h) Information tempts one to hold onto it; inspiration cannot be held onto; since it moves. Inspiration cannot be refuted...only ignored.
i) Suggesting others to refute information is easy; choosing to let go of all the suggested information one holds onto, as to free oneself within perceivable inspiration...that becomes harder and harder; the more one burdens self with suggested information.
Example: "I need more information about why it is so hard to let go"...a burdening problem.
It’s easier to fool someone then convince them they have been fooled.
Yup everything that comes out of the governments and their bought and run proganda outlets is full of lies and deception.
Most of the time what we get are competing narratives and all of them are misinformation. First one needs a standard for true information and a worldview that can ground it.
Easily refutable when asking the right questions or unearthing inconsistencies.
The government is quite busy here.
Marginalizing us has nothing to do with "hating the Jews." Why would you write something so--Ohh, right.
Which posts?
I can sympathize with people that don't want to explain common and obvious truths to people who are brainwashed.
I have talked with conspiracy deniers who don't even accept basic common knowledge facts that are counter narrative, and I don't have time for that.
We make time for that! You aren't having a one-on-one conversation to persuade the other party, but rather a public discourse where the other party is actually a sockpuppet army whose collective goal is to persuade everyone reading.
Now do you see why truth tellers always lose?
I disagree with the always lose part. The sockpuppet account is definitely possible.
I think the biggest problem with spreading the truth is that most people can't handle it. Even "no nonsense" Adam Carolla said if it were true that 9/11 was an inside job he didn't want to know because it would mess up his perception of reality. Basically like "hey don't spoil my good time".
Where are you quoting me from? It doesn't look like something I said in this thread.
What you encountered was one of the fake accounts that exists to make the readers believe--just by looking at the username--that there are a good number of people here who believe the Q hoax. Those are almost certainly sockpuppets.
Just wait until you realize that some of the loudest people here are actually just Muslims pushing their beliefs that come from Islam about Jews.
They let the mask slip enough. Piss drinkers, they muddy the waters with their bs.
That is a misdirection.
Depends on your knowledge base imho
The disinfo is crafted by technical experts.
So skilled they are that they failed to sway purebloods
The disinformation is believde by the vast majority of people.
EDIT: Typo
a) Amount of energy implies one...for all is one in energy.
b) Suggested amount (to rise) tempts one to ignore that only during fall (inception towards death) can one rise (life).
c) Fall (motion) and Rise (matter) of energy.
d) Motion generates momentum for the production of matter.
e) Product (life) cannot refute/drive back generation (inception towards death)...it can be tricked to spend resistance on refuting other products aka selling self out; when buying into others.
f) Suggestion (information) becomes the inversion of perception (inspiration)...if one consents to it.
g) Suggested information tempts one to miss perceivable inspiration by ignoring/denying it. Suggested "misinformation" tempts one to ignore perceivable..."information tempts one to miss inspiration".
Furthermore...ones consent to suggested information establishes a conflict of reason against another, hence DIS-information aka a division among form.
h) Information tempts one to hold onto it; inspiration cannot be held onto; since it moves. Inspiration cannot be refuted...only ignored.
i) Suggesting others to refute information is easy; choosing to let go of all the suggested information one holds onto, as to free oneself within perceivable inspiration...that becomes harder and harder; the more one burdens self with suggested information.
Example: "I need more information about why it is so hard to let go"...a burdening problem.