The article image is faked. The tower at the right casts a shadow to its left, so the sun is behind and to the right. Yet the rocket's shadow is cast to its right. Clearly faked.
Also, rocket emissions can contain particles, which cast shadows in a collective bulk way. We rocket weather scientists call these 'clouds', a new term peasants don't understand for things that block sunlight.
I think that the lighters and candles are only source of light in the room therefore no shadow. However the rocket has another source of light (the sun) behind it and therefore you will see a shadow of the flame because the light from sun is not passing through burning rocket fuel.
If that were the case you wouldn't be able to see shadows of the hands, match sticks, and candle stick, because the light of the fire is not behind those objects.
No, silly goose. Stand in a typical home or office. The amount of luminesce from a typical ceiling light during the day isn't enough to show a shadow that's visible, especially on darker surfaces.
Besides, the image of the rocket is fake and gay. Look at the shadows of the tower and the rocket, going different directions. Why are you posting fake images?
Silly goose, you can't see shit in the picture but his hand and the match.
Candle and match flame has a very low density - it is mostly still a gas and nearly transparent. This means that a light beam aimed at a flame will mostly go right through.
Show me the original Space X image on their website or something, before you post a doctored one that's fake and gay like you.
I suspect this may exist only to discredit critical thinkers and truthers. Associating retarded theories with questioning the mainstream narrative is an effective strategy to prevent the masses from questioning authority; just call every conspiracy exposed a "theory" and that their hats are made of foil.
I never understood why conspiracy theorists are open to just about any idea or theory that challenges mainstream narrative, EXCEPT flat earth theories.
And too many things get grouped into and censored with flat earth. For example, space exploration propaganda or moon landing hoaxes. Obvious CGI in space station footage.
These things really shouldn't be censored.
And even if flat earthers are wrong in their theory, what I find strange is how emotionally upset globe theorists get. If the globe theory were infallible, or if flat earth theories were so easily debunked, then there would be no need for emotion or censorship and the theories could easily be refuted.
I am not a flat earther. I do not claim to know what shape the earth is. The globe theory is what I am most familiar with because that was taught to me. But most of what was taught to me was lies. Was globe theory the one subject that government public schools and Jew Media and Hollywood told the truth about? Not likely.
All I ask of my fellow conspirators is to be more open minded and welcoming of flat earthers or engage the debate some as a challenge without the mockery and ridicule and it will make for interesting debate or maybe we can put it to rest because the debate will force someone to showcase some intriguing and convincing evidence to further substantiate globe theory or refute it.
The Earth may very well be round in a globe shape but there are other things such as NASA or Space X that might be feeding into lies and psy-ops. It certainly seems that these space programs are huge scams. Who can look at that fake Indian space landing and say it is real?
Or that DART project a couple years ago when they claimed to blow up an asteroid? That was extremely fake.
So I don't know if earth is flat but we need to openly discuss all this other fake shit going on related to space exploration, blowing up asteroids, pajeet dirty shitting Indians sending cartoon space ships to the moon, etc.
Track the planets in the sky, observe loopyloops. Simple answer: spheres orbiting sphere. Complex answer: stars are projected on a sky bulb and programed to dance in very specific way to make it look like spheres orbiting spheres.
If there's an architect who made an illusion of the entire starscape to fool us humans, then we are obligated as the lesser species to accept their illusion as fact: there is no power we hold that could compete against such gods.
Just as likely, our perceived universe is modeled off of other model universes and projected into our minds' experience by computers. The shape of the earth and universe would then be moot, an arbitrary dataset chosen by the computer's memory system. (in this case, also it makes no practical sense to reject the stated dimensions of your realm)
The most difficult thing about flat earth theory is the sun rising in east and setting in west.
They claim a sun just moves around a flat plane which doesn't make sense to me in explaining sunrise and sunsets.
But lots of this space exploration stuff seems fake to me, including much of what SpaceX is engaged in.
And I think Space X is really just an arm of the USA government military and the whole Space Force thing Trump marketed. For some reason government wanted to do some of the military communication through private firm Space X under CIA agent Elon Musk.
The history books are manipulated and thus fake and gay.
The holy books are ___________. Common now, 2+2=4, use that pattern seeking brain. This shit is the same all the way down. Fake and gay and manipulated to suit an agenda.
I don’t care which holy book you subscribe to for fuzzy feelings of hope cope and sneed, they’ve all been used for manipulation of other humans. Way cheaper to convince the fools that an invisible undetectable magic wizard is surveilling them every moment of their lives than pay a small army to enforce your will and monitor them to remove the ambitious and troublesomes.
When a book contains fairy tales such as a man living in the belly of a fish for three days, bellies of fish not being known to contain oxygen for 3 days worth of breathing, and a lack of corrosive stomach acid, which would need to work to allow said fish to get big enough to swallow a man whole? When said book spins the tale of a 900 year old man making a giant boat and then putting 2 of each animal on board, and sailed it for 40 days and 40 nights, with what exactly to feed the meat eating animals for 40 days? Not that you’d have time to feed any of them, with the required time to shovel all the shit they produce overboard. Then the issue of if everyone else was wicked and therefore drowned, we’re all incest babies from that family line repopulating the world? In addition the the original incest family lineage of adam and eve? That book?
Yeah maybe DON’T use that book as any kind of guide to the real world. Just because it says we live in a snowglobe sorry, “under the firmament”, but I repeat myself, doesn’t make it any more true than the belief that we’re all the result of a saucy dream from the flying spaghetti monster.
You’re right. We should allow our nations to be overwhelmed with niggers, spics, slants, and dune coons. Don’t bother creating any place where just you and yours can live in peace and safety, devoting brainpower to higher intellectual pursuits. Never get rid of universal threats.
The article image is faked. The tower at the right casts a shadow to its left, so the sun is behind and to the right. Yet the rocket's shadow is cast to its right. Clearly faked.
Also, rocket emissions can contain particles, which cast shadows in a collective bulk way. We rocket weather scientists call these 'clouds', a new term peasants don't understand for things that block sunlight.
I think that the lighters and candles are only source of light in the room therefore no shadow. However the rocket has another source of light (the sun) behind it and therefore you will see a shadow of the flame because the light from sun is not passing through burning rocket fuel.
Ah good point. That rebukes my argument then.
Phone flash light and a bic confirms this is a fake photo. Flame casts a shadow. Thanks king.
Also, the candle or bic lighter is an opposing light source. You need a much brighter light, like the sun.
lol
The pictures are with dim background lights, not bright sunlight.
No, silly goose. Stand in a typical home or office. The amount of luminesce from a typical ceiling light during the day isn't enough to show a shadow that's visible, especially on darker surfaces.
Besides, the image of the rocket is fake and gay. Look at the shadows of the tower and the rocket, going different directions. Why are you posting fake images?
I appreciate the laughs though.
Silly goose, you can't see shit in the picture but his hand and the match.
Candle and match flame has a very low density - it is mostly still a gas and nearly transparent. This means that a light beam aimed at a flame will mostly go right through.
Show me the original Space X image on their website or something, before you post a doctored one that's fake and gay like you.
https://space.stackexchange.com/questions/65199/do-the-flames-from-a-rocket-cast-a-shadow-and-more-generally-does-the-rocket
I suspect this may exist only to discredit critical thinkers and truthers. Associating retarded theories with questioning the mainstream narrative is an effective strategy to prevent the masses from questioning authority; just call every conspiracy exposed a "theory" and that their hats are made of foil.
His username is Archer, dog. He works for his mom as an I.S.I.S. spy.
here we go. the weeks most retarded post at the top of the frontpage.
what a time to be alive.
i thought that the flat earthers had been driven out?
Why drive them out?
I never understood why conspiracy theorists are open to just about any idea or theory that challenges mainstream narrative, EXCEPT flat earth theories.
And too many things get grouped into and censored with flat earth. For example, space exploration propaganda or moon landing hoaxes. Obvious CGI in space station footage.
These things really shouldn't be censored.
And even if flat earthers are wrong in their theory, what I find strange is how emotionally upset globe theorists get. If the globe theory were infallible, or if flat earth theories were so easily debunked, then there would be no need for emotion or censorship and the theories could easily be refuted.
I am not a flat earther. I do not claim to know what shape the earth is. The globe theory is what I am most familiar with because that was taught to me. But most of what was taught to me was lies. Was globe theory the one subject that government public schools and Jew Media and Hollywood told the truth about? Not likely.
All I ask of my fellow conspirators is to be more open minded and welcoming of flat earthers or engage the debate some as a challenge without the mockery and ridicule and it will make for interesting debate or maybe we can put it to rest because the debate will force someone to showcase some intriguing and convincing evidence to further substantiate globe theory or refute it.
The Earth may very well be round in a globe shape but there are other things such as NASA or Space X that might be feeding into lies and psy-ops. It certainly seems that these space programs are huge scams. Who can look at that fake Indian space landing and say it is real?
Or that DART project a couple years ago when they claimed to blow up an asteroid? That was extremely fake.
So I don't know if earth is flat but we need to openly discuss all this other fake shit going on related to space exploration, blowing up asteroids, pajeet dirty shitting Indians sending cartoon space ships to the moon, etc.
Track the planets in the sky, observe loopyloops. Simple answer: spheres orbiting sphere. Complex answer: stars are projected on a sky bulb and programed to dance in very specific way to make it look like spheres orbiting spheres.
If there's an architect who made an illusion of the entire starscape to fool us humans, then we are obligated as the lesser species to accept their illusion as fact: there is no power we hold that could compete against such gods.
Just as likely, our perceived universe is modeled off of other model universes and projected into our minds' experience by computers. The shape of the earth and universe would then be moot, an arbitrary dataset chosen by the computer's memory system. (in this case, also it makes no practical sense to reject the stated dimensions of your realm)
The most difficult thing about flat earth theory is the sun rising in east and setting in west.
They claim a sun just moves around a flat plane which doesn't make sense to me in explaining sunrise and sunsets.
But lots of this space exploration stuff seems fake to me, including much of what SpaceX is engaged in.
And I think Space X is really just an arm of the USA government military and the whole Space Force thing Trump marketed. For some reason government wanted to do some of the military communication through private firm Space X under CIA agent Elon Musk.
If there aren't cities on the dark side of the moon I'd be surprised. Earth is probably The Truman Show for someone.
where is the projector?
what's the size of the dome and where are the edges located?
The bible says there are seven heavens maybe meaning seven layers to the firmament.
But if you think the bible is fiction then none of that matters.
The government propaganda is fake and gay.
The news is fake and gay.
The history books are manipulated and thus fake and gay.
The holy books are ___________. Common now, 2+2=4, use that pattern seeking brain. This shit is the same all the way down. Fake and gay and manipulated to suit an agenda.
I don’t care which holy book you subscribe to for fuzzy feelings of hope cope and sneed, they’ve all been used for manipulation of other humans. Way cheaper to convince the fools that an invisible undetectable magic wizard is surveilling them every moment of their lives than pay a small army to enforce your will and monitor them to remove the ambitious and troublesomes.
When a book contains fairy tales such as a man living in the belly of a fish for three days, bellies of fish not being known to contain oxygen for 3 days worth of breathing, and a lack of corrosive stomach acid, which would need to work to allow said fish to get big enough to swallow a man whole? When said book spins the tale of a 900 year old man making a giant boat and then putting 2 of each animal on board, and sailed it for 40 days and 40 nights, with what exactly to feed the meat eating animals for 40 days? Not that you’d have time to feed any of them, with the required time to shovel all the shit they produce overboard. Then the issue of if everyone else was wicked and therefore drowned, we’re all incest babies from that family line repopulating the world? In addition the the original incest family lineage of adam and eve? That book?
Yeah maybe DON’T use that book as any kind of guide to the real world. Just because it says we live in a snowglobe sorry, “under the firmament”, but I repeat myself, doesn’t make it any more true than the belief that we’re all the result of a saucy dream from the flying spaghetti monster.
Yeah. i don't believe in fables and fairy tales.
Happy cake day, fellow redditor!
Oh, I don't mind having them here. The only mod who's left here threw a fit a while ago and wanted them gone.
If he’s really the only one left and the “board owner” isn’t coming back (hope it doesn’t, myself), why not wipe the flatties?
You’re right. We should allow our nations to be overwhelmed with niggers, spics, slants, and dune coons. Don’t bother creating any place where just you and yours can live in peace and safety, devoting brainpower to higher intellectual pursuits. Never get rid of universal threats.
is this a Conspirologist alt
here have a Jewish Russian psyop photo, I guess
https://www.timesofisrael.com/russia-to-stage-nuclear-missile-drills-amid-escalating-ukraine-crisis/