It's so strange how many people are completely incapable of thinking. As if by design there are those that can see beyond the curve while the majority cannot. Feel the truth flowing through us
how many people are completely incapable of thinking
a) Suggested pluralism (people) tempts perceiving singular (person) to ignore self for others.
b) COUNT, verb - "to number; to tell or name one by one, or by small numbers, for ascertaining the whole number of units in a collection"
Nature doesn't count; it designates units (Latin unitas; unus; one), hence differentiating whole oneness into each partial one within. Others suggest collectivism (many people) to trick one to count others while ignoring self.
If one counts what another suggests; then that establishes an ACCOUNT', noun - "a registry of a debt or credit"...consenting to suggested implies crediting debt.
Feel the truth flowing through us
a) Being implies form (life) within flow (inception towards death)
b) Holding onto suggested (information) tempts one to ignore that perceivable (inspiration) cannot be held onto...since it implies a flow-state.
c) Both truth and lie implies holding onto a suggested definition (definite; affixed), while ignoring being within motion aka constant change.
Choosing truth (want) vs lies (not want) ignores change (need)...the former implies the temptation to ignore latter.
a) Did you knew that the jew who coined schizophrenia (eugene bleuler) and the jew who was coined "father of psychoanalysis" (sigismund schlomo freud) conspired with one another to conquer psychiatry?
Could it be that gentiles psychoanalyzing each other as schizos; over a century after the aforementioned conspiracy, implies a successful conquering of the gentile mind?
b) Are you a person or a people? How does nature count? Can one form without flow? Can one hold onto inspiration? What if holding onto a truth; while within change, makes it a lie?
Can you answer any of these questions for yourself without psychoanalyzing others?
c) SCHIZO; noun (Greek skhizo) - "division; split; separate"...being one apart from one another implies a schism/schizo.
merely a conduit
Withing the merely (only) conduit (inception towards death) many channels (life) exist among one another...others suggest channels to distract from perceivable conduit.
How is this photo not also a reflection of .win readers?
You KNOW, deep down, that patrons of these sites are just the same type of people as those this photo depicts - spending too much time with heads stuck in their phones/tablets/internet.
Who told you that you were nothing special? The people that would convey such an idea only do it when they're punching up out of dissatisfaction with themselves.
You are assuming a level of authority which does not exist. I can see through your words into your motivations and unbeknownst to you they are not your own.
Point being, don't think you're special because you have some knowledge that others lack, because you're not.>
Thank God you weren't in recon you would've gotten everyone killed. You are making an assumption about someone you've never met because someone you trusted lied to you and you believed it.
It's so strange how many people are completely incapable of thinking. As if by design there are those that can see beyond the curve while the majority cannot. Feel the truth flowing through us
It'll make diamonds and it'll make dust.
a) Suggested pluralism (people) tempts perceiving singular (person) to ignore self for others.
b) COUNT, verb - "to number; to tell or name one by one, or by small numbers, for ascertaining the whole number of units in a collection"
Nature doesn't count; it designates units (Latin unitas; unus; one), hence differentiating whole oneness into each partial one within. Others suggest collectivism (many people) to trick one to count others while ignoring self.
If one counts what another suggests; then that establishes an ACCOUNT', noun - "a registry of a debt or credit"...consenting to suggested implies crediting debt.
a) Being implies form (life) within flow (inception towards death)
b) Holding onto suggested (information) tempts one to ignore that perceivable (inspiration) cannot be held onto...since it implies a flow-state.
c) Both truth and lie implies holding onto a suggested definition (definite; affixed), while ignoring being within motion aka constant change.
Choosing truth (want) vs lies (not want) ignores change (need)...the former implies the temptation to ignore latter.
Are you schizophrenic?
I think it's a bot.
a) Did you knew that the jew who coined schizophrenia (eugene bleuler) and the jew who was coined "father of psychoanalysis" (sigismund schlomo freud) conspired with one another to conquer psychiatry?
Could it be that gentiles psychoanalyzing each other as schizos; over a century after the aforementioned conspiracy, implies a successful conquering of the gentile mind?
b) Are you a person or a people? How does nature count? Can one form without flow? Can one hold onto inspiration? What if holding onto a truth; while within change, makes it a lie?
Can you answer any of these questions for yourself without psychoanalyzing others?
c) SCHIZO; noun (Greek skhizo) - "division; split; separate"...being one apart from one another implies a schism/schizo.
Withing the merely (only) conduit (inception towards death) many channels (life) exist among one another...others suggest channels to distract from perceivable conduit.
You tangentially dissect my statements and answer questions with questions, that's all you had to say schizo!
To dissect another ones state of mind implies a split; division; separation...schism/schizo.
There you just did it again! You don't get outside much do you? I bet you are the life of the party.
And gentiles keep wondering how YOU/JEW hold power...
Free will of choice implies within balance aka in-between (life) sides (inception/death).
Hence; partial (life) within whole (inception towards death).
Whenever few suggest "party"; then to distract many from being partial within whole.
Like for example: "Party (partial) in the city (center) where the heat (cause of sensation) is on" ... https://genius.com/Will-smith-miami-lyrics
How is this photo not also a reflection of .win readers?
You KNOW, deep down, that patrons of these sites are just the same type of people as those this photo depicts - spending too much time with heads stuck in their phones/tablets/internet.
Today, I am euphoric.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4i_dsLfTzE
Being implies different partial within same whole...others tempt one to ignore this for behaving alike.
Consenting to stand-under/understand suggested spell-craft (letters into words) tempts one to ignore perceivable sound.
Nature doesn't shape letters...it offers each one the free will of choice to "let" others choose for one, when ignoring self.
...while many choose to only see what a few suggest them to watch.
We are nothing special. Conspiracy theorists think of themselves as the new gnostics.
Who told you that you were nothing special? The people that would convey such an idea only do it when they're punching up out of dissatisfaction with themselves.
You're misunderstanding. Point being, don't think you're special because you have some knowledge that others lack, because you're not.
Besides, the people here, including me, are wrong as often as they are correct.
Suppression of cognitive dissonance is a rare character trait. I agree it is something special
Non-conformity means nothing, it could be a hinderance or a help, depending on the topic and the time period.
Critical thinking is indeed in short supply, but that's always been the case, as the mob after Socrates attests.
Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind. Bernard M. Baruch
I'll do you one better: "Ye shall know them by their fruit" - Jesus
You are assuming a level of authority which does not exist. I can see through your words into your motivations and unbeknownst to you they are not your own.
I'm not assuming anything, I'm merely observing.
Thank God you weren't in recon you would've gotten everyone killed. You are making an assumption about someone you've never met because someone you trusted lied to you and you believed it.
The value of knowledge is determined by its context. I'm sure someone in recon who didn't know rocket physics would fuck up at Space X.
You again are making assumptions and believing they are facts. When you see the world as black and white you separate yourself from reality.