One thing i’ve struggled to find is a good reason for support of Israel. From the general public I mean, not from politicians who just keep using the grift but actual American citizens. For the life of me i can’t think of a single reason anyone in north america gives two shits about the middle east at all, much less support and quote the tired “muh greatest ally” crap. Where did the push for this come from? How did it start? Was it newspaper propaganda slowly inserting it to where the normies simply accepted it to be truth? Was it something they drilled into you in grade school and it never got questioned later?
Ignoring the entire jew angle for a moment here, greatest ally for what? What help has ever been given to get this title? FRANCE I can see as America’s best ally after the help in the revolutionary war of independence, the whole gifting of the statue of liberty etc. but what has Israel ever done? We know about the U.S.S. Liberty, we know they did espionage for nuclear weapon tech, they don’t exactly keep the middle east secure and quiet and keep the muslims in check at all. Just WHAT is the deal?
Im early 40’s, and have yet to see anything positive in regards to Israel (or the middle East in general to be honest) to the point where i might not even grunt in affirmation to hear that the whole region is now a glowing ocean crater(fiery but mostly peaceful nuclear protest you see). Those who grew up when support for Israel was being pushed, what did you see to cause this?
The crux of the whole matter is "Christian Zionism", and you can find a narrative regarding it and it's effects here:
The untold story of Christian Zionism’s rise to power in the United States
Note that it's the "untold story". If you find that you've never before heard of a lot of the information in it and that is is indeed "untold", that's proof enough there that this is where important truth lies.
Let me note here that I have concluded the author of that article, Whitney Webb, is controlled opposition, so you can interpret everything in it as, "it's at least as bad as this and maybe way worse".
For example, she states there are more than 20M Christian Zionists. I have heard elsewhere both 70M and 1-in-3 US adults. Where can we go for an authoritative figure? Nowhere. It's so huge They wish to keep the number a secret. See how it works?
Spinning off the thesis just in one direction for a moment, one can consider the case of Trump and the Christian Zionists. He steps very carefully around the issue, wears the small hats, has kike grandkids, the whole thing. Shills and the gullible immediately claim this as irrefutable proof he's a Zio stooge. I doubt that.
The thing is, you can't just tell tens of millions of Americans that their religion is devotion to a murderous and outrageously destructive Satanic heresy. Nothing productive would come of it, so he doesn't. Maybe the day will come but it's not today.
Like with this latest war in the Middle East, if you pay very, very close attention, you can tell he gets what's really going on. He may make a little noise and wave his hands against "terrorism" and in support of ordinary Israelis, but when asked if he thought the US should get involved, he said, "Sometimes you just gotta let things play out." Is that something an End Times messianic Zio puppet would say? Of course not.
So you can see the complex situation that has developed, and this is just the tip of the iceberg. I would suggest that anyone who goes around spouting clear and easy answers to any of this is someone you don't need to listen to.
I have a feeling he would say this regardless, but especially if he knows already that the U.S. is going to be involved.
I think the situation isn't that complex though...Trump would not be day after day the most posted about topic in politics on Reddit if he was the enemy. He'd be long gone.
Well, the determinative factor here is the response of the Establishment towards what Trump said. When I heard him say it, I thought, "OMG, he's throwing Israel to their fate and they are going to thrash him for it from now til November! He'll be the 21st Century's Hitler!"
But what did we get? Silence, from everybody. I have never once heard it repeated.
So on the one hand, it's just impossible to come up with the way that this could be "the party line". Things are very confused right now, but no one of any stripe is saying this.
On the other hand, if the statement is anti-Zio-Establishment, well, why aren't They wrecking him day and night, and pressing him to dig himself in deeper with his wanton disregard for the Heebs? He may as well slit all their throats personally!
They won't press him on it because whatever he says, it's just going to draw more attention to the issue and start punching holes in their tissue-thin pretext over an otherwise naked genocide. If he's willing to check and not raise, so are They.
IMHO, he doesn't feel the need to say anything more because he knows it's being handled by other parties like Hezbollah, Iran, Russia, China, anti-war lefties, the UN, the Global South, etc, etc. I would concur that together they have all they need and this may all end in the fullness of time with the (eventually) peaceful dismantling of the Zionist Entity.
It's the best path I can think of, really. Israel is shaking itself apart as we speak, and there are a lot of people that just wish to let it do so.
"fullness of time"
Indeed, Saturn has just about run its course. It'd be interesting to see what the world is like when Satanism is an anachronism. LOL
If the Bible is correct about it, they will flee for Israel, where they will recount what they did for all to hear. They will rightly be seen as the objects of horror that they are.
Thanks for the link, as you had guessed i hadn’t seen most of that info before. So its been a religious push by elites who think they know it all and want to either end the world or usher in a new perfect one in their mind…
Right. Well, in the end it's all a bunch of crazy bullshit, but the important thing to keep in mind is that no matter how crazy it seems, these people really do seem to believe it and make decisions based on it, as hard as that may be to believe... lol
What I found absolutely shocking is that a whole lot of people not subjected to this Messianic heretical nonsense also believe we're living in the End Times:
About four-in-ten U.S. adults believe humanity is ‘living in the end times’ (12/8/2022)
I mean, how does that affect a person's decision-making? Who the hell knows, but I guarantee it's not in a good way.
TBF, since when has mankind had nearly instantaneous worldwide communication and virtually one common language?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eBkzqNSDvnY
As far as we know this is the first time. But if your cell phone got crushed under a glacier for 10000 years, would you be able to identify it? Previous advanced tech could be impossible to reconstruct depending on conditions
Oh yeah, I mean I can't discount something that's virtually unprovable.
I mean, we might not be able to identify the phone or it's components if it were that old, but it may be possible to notice if there was remnants of ancient tech if weird concentrations of heavier metals were found in sediment samples.
I would say that based upon what we know of the evolution of stone tools, I would find it unlikely.
Yeah you’re right that we MAY have an idea that something could be there due to those metals in concentrations but its guesses at best. Anything under the ocean is basically a write off after enough time, anything a glacier or tectonic plate went over is toast. Depending on the timescale its possible but maybe not likely.
For all we know, that could be the single reason Antarctica is really off-limits.
I do know that one popular conspiracy video about Antarctica a couple of guys showed their equipment, and then a bunch of weird altars for each person. And they said there were other altars deeper that they did not show. Also, the video had some strange cuts in it.
One of the altars had a VERY questionable picture on it. Like "pizza party" realm.
And John Kerry was there...
Shit, maybe Antarctica is Atlantis frozen over.
I'm just speaking to the weird overlap between occultism and "technology".
Crazy bullshit if it only affected them and left the rest of us alone I’d be cool with. Its the fact that they shove this shit onto all of us that pisses me off the most. Can’t be left alone, gotta make end times! Someone who thinks we’re at the end times is gonna act like it, you’re right. Explains a lot of the stupider choices made lately…
a) What if importing and keeping what others are suggesting leads to a whole lot of people believing in the end times?
b) What if import (buy) export (sell) is a merchants game?
c) What if im-port and ex-port tempt one into a H'ARBOR, noun- "a lodging; a place of entertainment and rest" aka into a port?
d) What if memory/mind can be tempted to ignore impress for import? What if pressing implies pressure going through memory; while Latin porto implies carrying things within memory?
e) Do the elderly behave as if they could keep what's in their memory or does dying teach living the need to let go? Ever notice the relief of letting go of constipation within procession?
a) RELIGION (Latin religio; to bind anew)...it ain't a push, but a pull aka the temptation to bind self to another, when consenting to suggested.
b) ELITE (French élite; selection, choice)...ones choice to select another. If ones choice selects another, then ones choice selects a chosen one.
Brilliant psyop indeed. I had no idea it was even ingrained into mormonism as well!
Dude thats pretty fucked up… thank you for the info, i’ve never heard of them doing that before!
Israel was founded by the Rothschilds to establish a region that would serve as a global capital with Jerusalem at the center. You probably know that they also control all of the central banks and most of the world's resources & commodities (along with other "banking" Satanist kid-fucking/killing families). This means they also own the media and in many ways "own" religion. They financed and published the Oxford Bible to promote the "Jews" as "God's chosen people." Thus is born Christian Zionism, which ensured a strong pro-Israel foothold in the U.S.
The media and religion have taught America that Israel is a much needed ally because 1.) religiously, it's the home of "God's chosen," and 2.) politically, it's our bulwark against the terrorist Arab/Muslims.
What's most important is that its founders control our money supply, and if you rise to any level of politics, media, entertainment or finance without loyalty to them, you don't get paid and/or you disappear. What's also important is that the "Jews" who maintain this control do not represent real (Hebrew/Semitic) "Jews," and are Satanists in practice – mostly descended from the Khazarians.
That's the Cliff's notes, as I understand them, and I leave much out. Searches on this site would be fruitful.
So if im reading you right, it was more of a religious push than a government one, and setup around 1900 and not so much 1948? Simply continuing the plan not making a new one? That makes a lot of sense. Very few religious people i know have any ability to critically think, as soon as its argument-from-authority and that authority is the church the brain shuts down. A shepherd leading their non dissenting flock of sheep…
Do you find younger generations tend to lack this inbuilt “muh ally” conditioning? I saw through the lies and walked away from the church decades ago and honestly don’t have many highly religious people in my circle to discuss it with. I know younger gens have been trending less towards organized religion so maybe theres still hope. A fools hope but hope none the less.
One of the most prominent British Christian Zionists of the 19th century was Lord Shaftesbury, who was also a notable social reformer. His advocacy for the restoration of the Jews to Palestine was intertwined with British identity and policy from the 1830s onwards.
It didn't take so much to push the needle back then. It all seems to stem from a single book.
https://fathomjournal.org/british-christian-zionism-and-george-eliots-daniel-deronda/
"...as soon as its argument-from-authority and that authority is the church the brain shuts down."
I was raised a Southern Baptist, and that's how it was. I started really thinking about the Doctrine of Salvation and the Book of Job, and shit started colliding in my mind until that paradigm was shattered – and all for the best, of course.
I don't feel that I'm in-tune enough with what the younger generations are thinking, but I have seen a lot of personal stories on r/conspiracy about teenagers coming to terms with a lot of truth that I didn't even think about until I was 40. That's partly because the whole power structure got in our faces in a new way on 9/11/01, and there's been a cornucopia of new and creative global psy-ops and overt aggressions since. It's much more difficult to ignore than it was in the 80s and 90s.
Edit: That last statement is very American. Those in Central America, Eastern Europe and the Balkans, Middle/Far East, Africa and elsewhere were very aware and victims of the power structure in those decades
Yeah canadian here and 9/11 wasn’t AS affecting on me as it would be an american child going through it but was still fucked with due to proximity. Have had to deal with US policy having impacts on my life without any way to change or shape them, never gets any easier. Part of me wishes there was a way to stop this without bloodshed but the rational part of me knows it wont end til I pull the sword off the wall and start removing heads and only stop when its done. There can be no compromise with these fucks, rip and tear until it is done. They wont stop so we can’t leave any of them.
The Scofield Reference Bible created an entire generation who worshipped jews instead of Christ.
It’s literally that simple.
So just religious propaganda and because America was mostly christian it was never questioned when presented… that makes perfect sense.
But worshipping Christ IS worshipping Jews, for Jesus was the rejected Jewish messiah who himself said “Salvation is of the Jews” and that he has come only for the lost sheep of the house of Israel “ and who admonished his disciples not to go into the way of the gentiles but to instead search out the lost sheep of the house of Israel”
It was Paul who preached Christ to the Gentiles. Jesus wanted nothing to do with them.
Worshipping Christ IS worshipping Jews. He is the lure, the false shepherd who tricked Edom into worshipping the god of Israel.
And a similar trick played on Ismael ie Islam.
All Abrahamic religions are based on the tanakh and work towards the fulfilment of its prophecies, such as Isaiah 60:01-22
Still repeating this spam, huh. You’d think you paid shills would learn by now. Do you get paid per buzzword or something? Most shills spread them out rather than repeat the same dogwhistles in every post.
You’re the shill, clearly.
People who accuse others of being a shill are lame and just can’t fathom that there’s more views on a topic than the one they hold
Thanks for admitting you were wrong. Fuck off forever, coward.
I definitely see no reason so support Israel especially for what they're doing to Palestinian cities.
This is what I have read https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/nostra-aetate
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nostra_aetate
https://www.bitchute.com/video/cUFQiR0goivH/ Scofield bible (haven't watched this but will and will edit if weird to a better link). Ok it's a good video (I watched).
This is probably worth including as well and you can dig deeper to find this is true of many old maps : https://www.bitchute.com/video/PvzwFsiUjPTt/
I believe the Jewish people themselves have also been deceived. While many people don't like every thing about MLK I believe he is right about every individual should be judged by their character and not skin an important note to remember in a time I believe people are intentionally being divided.
I was raised extremely pro Israel. And it wasn't until I was older I gave it much thought as to why everyone in my church was so pro Israel nor did I care about politics, wars or much outside my bubble of existence. As far as I knew Jewish people were just like us except they didn't believe in the new testament, this is what I was taught.
Individual implies within division. It's your beliefs which contradict your state of being.
Yeah but it's a division by individual characteristics not division by groups which often as in the race of a person one has no control of.
a) Race (Latin raddix; radius; ray) implies through one outwards...not which out group one chooses to be part of. Being also implies center (perception) of surrounding (perceivable), hence radius radiating outwards into circumference through ones senses.
Inception towards death implies LINE, hence lineage for each living radius within. Sleight of hand: "race to the bottom line".
b) To control implies to restrain; being implies "free" will of choice; hence being free within STRAIN (to stretch). Inception towards death implies the stretch; the life within the free will of choice, momentarily unrestrained.
In other words...only if nature is in control can those within be free to choose, yet what is it that those within nature choose? More control over each other.
c) "division by groups" implies a divided one (partial within whole) joining with other ones into a group. This is called collectivism; it's being suggested by few to tempt many together, while nature continuous to divide everything (whole) into each thing (partials).
To make this more simple...off-spring implies division from another, not joining with another.
Notice that all those who want to join into groups, afterwards try desperately to stand out from all the others...like wearing a uniform to be part of a group; just to do anything to get promotions over others.
d) Character implies a mark made upon form, hence an engraving of characteristics into malleable form within a flowing system. The initial division implies from flow (whole) into form (partials)...the "character" marks are made afterwards.
Sleight of hand: "people always tell me; you're quite a character"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQnaRtNMGMI
BUT implies that you have an issue with division; yet YEAH implies versus NAY aka a conflict of reason (agree vs disagree) aka a division against one another.
If one grows self discernment as partial within whole, then there's no BUT (except; besides; unless) to whole. Sleight of hand...BUTT-HOLE. Many are making themselves the but-end of a joke the few suggested them to play on each other.
Well I suppose it's up to one to believe they are divided by individual characteristics or not. Humanity no doubt is a whole in some ways as in I do believe we are all connected. In order to function as a whole we all need different talents and interest. So is being an individual actually a division or just being part of the whole? I don't agree we should be divided in groups based on those interests either. As in you want to be punk rock so you only hang out with other punk rock kids. Or if you are gay you only hang out with gay people. These are false identities and not actually anything to do with who someone is at the core. The tribal group no matter what it is is one I think that divides people. In my mind an ideal humanity wouldn't need others to tell them their likes or needs but each person would know what they each like and who they are. If humanity truly each followed one's passions I believe we would function better. Most people are afraid to do what they love so they end up going to work in an office or some unfulfilling job. People do this out of fear of failure and desire for security so imo to find some self worth or identity they join some group that then reassures them that they have an identity and purpose even though the group is a superficial identity. The division I believe that is being forced on people is separation into these false identity groups, race, interest, activism, political beliefs and so on. So when I say individual I truly mean this. Why do people only need to hang out with others just like them? Isn't that boring? I have never understood the group mentality and always had peers of all sorts and found it much more interesting. You could use the actual human body as an example. If ears only grew with other ears and refused to grow with other parts of the body they would not be able to function and would die. Until humans start valuing ones own true identity I believe we will be out of balance.
To believe implies ones consent to another ones suggestion. Can you show me a belief that isn't build upon suggestion?
OR implies origin. NOT (Latin nihilo, nothing) implies ones denial of perceivable origin.
a) Human aka HUE (color) of man implies within visible spectrum of light, with light implying the origin aka the whole for each partial within.
b) DOUBT, verb - "waver; fluctuation in opinion" implies the status quo of being a wave-form; fluctuation within light. Others suggest belief; trust; faith; truth etc. as the inversion of doubt, hence tricking one to hold onto something affixed while ignoring everything moving.
If singular (one) consents to suggested pluralism (we) a connection; bond; contract is being made. Also; the opposite of all (whole) implies each one (partial)...not we (partials put together).
Only within connection (inception towards death) can there be separation (life). Others tempt one to ignore separation for re-connection aka mixing together to destroy partials.
Whole implies natural order; partials within imply chaos; struggling to sustain self within order. Only then can those within establish chaos without harming order.
Function implies FUNCOR (to perfom) TION (action) aka reacting form within enacting flow. So being implies partial function within order of whole.
It doesn't matter how many partials come together...they can never be a whole, because each partial already exist within whole. Nature is already complete; nobody within can add anything to it, only draw from it to transmute within it.
Consider the opposite...different want (life) within same need (inception towards death), which implies ones need to resist want as to be able to sustain self.
How could partials come to be without "internal" division of whole? The trick to deceive one from comprehending this is suggested dualism (two). Whole doesn't divide into two, but remains oneness (whole) for each one (partial) within.
There is no TWO in nature, only ONE whole aka energy (internal/inherent power). If energy implies one, that what does two imply? Two energy? What does more energy imply to energy itself? Once again it's the opposite...each one within all energy implies less than origin provides, which only then allows each ones growth.
Ask yourself about the origin of "two"...does two exist without oneself counting other ones as two? Show me any two things and I will describe how each one is only discernible from one another; because each one exist at a different position from one another, hence within/during/in-between ongoing differentiation aka natural order aka momentum (inception towards death) of motion.
Show me the being "we"...
So what happens if one of the kids also does jazz; pop; hip-hop and gospel? How many labels (pluralism) does one (singular) need to satisfy wants?
Yet so is "identity aka identical aka same", because each one is different from one another. Core (perception) also implies within periphery (perceivable)...suggestions like identitarianism corrupts core.
Core (life) moves within periphery (inception towards death)...identity implies an affixed label slapped onto core.
Which requires each ones self discernment as choice in-between balance (need/want)...as opposed to imbalance (want vs not want or would vs wouldn't).
Sleight of hand: William Tell aka I am free will of choice (will-i-am) uttering words (tell)... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Tell
PAS'SION, noun (Latin passio, from patior, to suffer) - "the impression or effect of an external agent upon a body" aka being (life) within passion (inception towards death); also passion of christ (anointed one).
One needs to resist the temptation/passion of wanting to follow...others tempt one to follow suggested, while ignoring to resist perceivable.
PASS (passage) ION (action) aka ones passage within action.
Fear implies towards suggested outcomes; while ignoring perceivable origin. Love implies versus hate aka a conflict of reason shaped by ones consent to suggested moralism.
That implies wanting to be filled; while ignoring needing to resist stuffing self, while within procession. Filling self leads to constipation (a pressing together); letting go of constipation within procession leads to relief.
Being implies evaluation (perception) within value (perceivable)...others suggest worth to corrupt ones evaluation, and if one consents, then others are permitted to devalue ones evaluation.
Value implies within motion (inspiration); suggested worth tempts one to hold onto it (information)...filling oneself with information constipates self, while tempting one to ignore perceivable inspiration.
Few suggest many to amalgamate; mix; come together etc. which tempts each consenting one to ignore being a partial within a moving whole. Natural order forces separation (inception to life) and unification (life to death)...beings within natural order suggest unification (coming together) to distract from separation (being apart) and ones consent to that suggestion binds one together with others.
Like for example being part of a punk rock band/bind/bund or religion (Latin religion; to bind anew) etc.
It's ones consent to suggested pluralism (them; people); which tempts one to ignore that that each one person is different from one another.
Understand aka "standing under" the suggestions of others when consenting to follow...group mentality.
Which implies self discernment aka something one cannot get through suggestions by others. Also; one cannot be out of balance; since being implies center (choice) of balance (need/want). It's ignorance/denial which imbalances self (want vs not want), while ignoring being within balance (need/want).
The conflict (reason) only exist within ones mind, because one willingly chooses to hold onto it. Others cannot release that hold, but it's super easy to tempt others to keep holding onto, hence a few merchants of temptations tricking many to hold onto all kinds of shit.
Thanks for inspiring me to write this btw. Great post.
Towelheads are abrasive, rude, and violently bigoted. Jews hate towelheads. Therefore, jews help with my towelhead problem.
Isreal was mandated by Britain, and so the continuity of Isreal would be an indicator that the Europeans haven't lost their influence over Eurasia. (Exactly how Ukraine's existence is proof that Russia is beneath the US.)
historical Bible cities and structures which may be interesting to preserve are inside Isreal
None of it is liking jews. I don't dislike them either. I guess their money games never bothered me. Them torturing their little boys with a chomped off dick is evil but it doesn't affect me. Jewish girls can be wild and fun, but how is that unique?
Mostly they're just symbolic that my team won before I was born. If the jews fall, that's a canary in the coal mine that my sons are going to have to war for their resources.
Reasoning implies a conflict...good vs bad aka dualism, hence not one thing, but two. It's a trick others utilize to distract one from self.
a) SUPPORT, verb (Latin supporto; to carry) - "to endure without being overcome". Being implies supplement (life) within support (inception towards death). Life doesn't support; it supplies.
b) Hebrew yisra'el - "he that striveth with God". To strive implies "struggling in opposition" aka resistance (life) struggling in opposition to velocity (inception towards death) aka those who resist support by struggling to sustain self.
In short...nature implies the only support; each one within implies struggle to sustain self (israel).
a) "great" denotes more then something else; "ally" implies all aka more than each one within.
b) ALLY', verb (Latin ligo) - "to unite" + UNIT; noun (Latin unitas; unus) - "one". Therefore; oneness (all) and each one within. That's nature... greatest ally of those who struggle to sustain self.
a) Ones consent (buy) to the suggestions (sell) by another implies the deal with the devil.
b) DEAL, verb - "to divide; to part; to separate; hence, to divide in portions; to distribute"...that implies nature dividing itself into each one within.
Sleight of hand: "raw deal" aka RAW, adjective (Latin crudus, rodo) - "not altered from its natural state". Suggestion (artificial) alters Perception (natural).