I enjoy reading the comments on "moon landing" videos. The lengths to which people will go to defend the event as actually happening never let me down.
I learned that these clowns believe that the reason you can't see any propulsion coming from the 'spacecraft' as it's leaving the moon to head back to Earth is because "they used fuel that makes the thrust invisible".
Apollo Lunar Lander Launch Hoax - Note the bright white center of the base. That is supposedly flames from the rocket exhaust. The colored dots are pyrotechnics
Note the bright white center of the base is now gone, and that if this white light was supposedly flames from the rocket exhaust, then we can clearly see there is no exhaust coming from underneath the lander
Apollo 17 Liftoff from Moon Dec 14, 1972 [L] Note white light at center of base that is supposedly flames from rocket exhaust [R] Note light at base is now gone, and if light was supposedly flames from rocket exhaust, now we can clearly see theres no exhaust coming from under lander
They aren't special effects, therefore, they don't have to be good or bad.
Come now, let's be adults here.
It's not that you are gullible, either, for believing wrong things. I suppose you are a fairly intelligent man, who came to the conclusions you did not by accident.
Do you remember when or where you learned the words "consume" or "contingency"? Probably not. That is a form of amnesia, believe it or not.
That's a long way of saying, I don't remember what evidence, learned in the past, convinced me. I have been on this earth over 4 decades now. If you want confirmatory evidence I've looked at recently, we can talk about that.
So you readily admit that you cant even remember the so-called evidence that convinced you of this absurdity, and yet you are pretty sure that whatever the evidence was, it was credible?
I’m guessing your TV told you men walked on the moon, and you believed it, because it was on TV?
You know they call the TV a stupid box for a reason, right?
please refrain from using the following arguments, because they are not yours, and they suck anyway,
If it was a hoax, Russia would have sent me a singing telegram
if it was a hoax, someone inside NASA would have talked to the newspapers who were also in on it.
theres a reflector on the moon, and they can hit it with a laser to measure distance to the moon. and yet, the reflector itself is so small, that you can't even see it with the worlds most powerful telescopes.
they brought back some rocks from the moon, that later turned out to be petrified wood.
Like you're coming up with your own unique take on why we didn't go to the moon, that you didn't just hear somewhere yourself.
I'm sorry, but you don't get to dictate the terms of the debate. I don't accept that, and you have no authority to enforce it.
As to your four points.
At the height of the Cold War, it would certainly behoove Russia to expose a fraud, and they had spies honeycombed throughout the defense network. But they didn't. Why?
If it was a hoax, the question isn't so much why it didn't get outed then, but the inevitable outing of it as a hoax in the future when man, continuing space exploration, would inevitably go to the moon again.
If you understood the vast gulfs of space and the limited power of the visual telescopes to see small objects you would drop this entirely as an objection. Even if there was pictures where you could see the rover, you'd call them fake. Still, you can see the disturbances on the ground caused by the missions, like seeing a hole that was dug even if you can't see the shovel.
God help you if you ever get charged with a crime and you've never heard of the concept of chain of custody. It is true is that meteorites thought from the moon get misidentified. It's also true that the moon used to be part of the earth and to layman they are indistinguishable. It's true there are hoaxes. It's also true that fake moon rocks show up from time to time without chain of custody, and occasionally real moon rocks do without chain of custody as well. But moon rocks with a chain of custody of NASA only ownership, that's not true.
Something tells me you havent even spent one whole minute working out the math or physics of your absurd story, and yet you still think you understand?
The more you actually learn about any given topic, the more you realize you don’t actually know anything at all.
Glow harder. But just for anyone else reading this:
The gov doesn't need to tell me the earth is round. I can figure it out for myself using basic physics. And they figured that out in 200 b.c., you're telling me you can't using modern technology?
What's the reason for faking the moon landings, genius? Who makes money or gains power?
I enjoy reading the comments on "moon landing" videos. The lengths to which people will go to defend the event as actually happening never let me down.
I learned that these clowns believe that the reason you can't see any propulsion coming from the 'spacecraft' as it's leaving the moon to head back to Earth is because "they used fuel that makes the thrust invisible".
My God. These people are basically retarded.
It will look more real next time OK?
which leads us to India faking a moon mission recently
NooooOOOooooo!!! But there were rainbow sparkles that shot out during blastoff!!!!!
Apollo Lunar Lander Launch Hoax - Note the bright white center of the base. That is supposedly flames from the rocket exhaust. The colored dots are pyrotechnics
https://i.redd.it/ac5r52fqvb211.png
Note the bright white center of the base is now gone, and that if this white light was supposedly flames from the rocket exhaust, then we can clearly see there is no exhaust coming from underneath the lander
https://i.redd.it/ev3iglb6xb211.png
Apollo 17 Liftoff from Moon Dec 14, 1972 [L] Note white light at center of base that is supposedly flames from rocket exhaust [R] Note light at base is now gone, and if light was supposedly flames from rocket exhaust, now we can clearly see theres no exhaust coming from under lander
https://i.redd.it/rqzzv1xuzb211.png
Apollo 17 Liftoff from Moon Dec 14, 1972 Note the Red, Green and Blue Pyrotechnics used for Special Effects
https://i.redd.it/ufskanpcac211.png
Whenever someone says "obviously" or "clearly" they don't have a very good argument to make, so they are going about begging the question.
https://i.redd.it/ufskanpcac211.png
Its not that these special effect are remarkably good,
Its that you are remarkably gullible …
They aren't special effects, therefore, they don't have to be good or bad.
Come now, let's be adults here.
It's not that you are gullible, either, for believing wrong things. I suppose you are a fairly intelligent man, who came to the conclusions you did not by accident.
what actual evidence convinced you that white men walked on the moon?
Do you remember when or where you learned the words "consume" or "contingency"? Probably not. That is a form of amnesia, believe it or not.
That's a long way of saying, I don't remember what evidence, learned in the past, convinced me. I have been on this earth over 4 decades now. If you want confirmatory evidence I've looked at recently, we can talk about that.
What.....consume is like a 3rd grade word
Do you remember when you first learned it?
So you readily admit that you cant even remember the so-called evidence that convinced you of this absurdity, and yet you are pretty sure that whatever the evidence was, it was credible?
I’m guessing your TV told you men walked on the moon, and you believed it, because it was on TV?
You know they call the TV a stupid box for a reason, right?
please refrain from using the following arguments, because they are not yours, and they suck anyway,
If it was a hoax, Russia would have sent me a singing telegram
if it was a hoax, someone inside NASA would have talked to the newspapers who were also in on it.
theres a reflector on the moon, and they can hit it with a laser to measure distance to the moon. and yet, the reflector itself is so small, that you can't even see it with the worlds most powerful telescopes.
they brought back some rocks from the moon, that later turned out to be petrified wood.
Like you're coming up with your own unique take on why we didn't go to the moon, that you didn't just hear somewhere yourself.
I'm sorry, but you don't get to dictate the terms of the debate. I don't accept that, and you have no authority to enforce it.
As to your four points.
At the height of the Cold War, it would certainly behoove Russia to expose a fraud, and they had spies honeycombed throughout the defense network. But they didn't. Why?
If it was a hoax, the question isn't so much why it didn't get outed then, but the inevitable outing of it as a hoax in the future when man, continuing space exploration, would inevitably go to the moon again.
If you understood the vast gulfs of space and the limited power of the visual telescopes to see small objects you would drop this entirely as an objection. Even if there was pictures where you could see the rover, you'd call them fake. Still, you can see the disturbances on the ground caused by the missions, like seeing a hole that was dug even if you can't see the shovel.
God help you if you ever get charged with a crime and you've never heard of the concept of chain of custody. It is true is that meteorites thought from the moon get misidentified. It's also true that the moon used to be part of the earth and to layman they are indistinguishable. It's true there are hoaxes. It's also true that fake moon rocks show up from time to time without chain of custody, and occasionally real moon rocks do without chain of custody as well. But moon rocks with a chain of custody of NASA only ownership, that's not true.
I actually spent several years summerizing all of the math and physics into one easy to understand page, which you can review here:
https://i.redd.it/g287hbmcb94z.png
Something tells me you havent even spent one whole minute working out the math or physics of your absurd story, and yet you still think you understand?
The more you actually learn about any given topic, the more you realize you don’t actually know anything at all.
Look at your last vaccine, for example…
The fake moon landing and flat earth posts are great. Just like colored hair, they allow me to avoid the morons (who are mostly feds.)
right, because the people who lied to you about COVID,
would never dream of lying to you about
Sandy Hook
Boston Marathon Bombing
Holocaust
Moon Landings
Viet Nam War
9/11
Don't answer trolls, who come here just to mock. It's a waste of time. Just like their life of trolling.
If they don't actually seek an answer, just downvote them and move on. They seek someone to match their anger issues.
Glow harder. But just for anyone else reading this:
The gov doesn't need to tell me the earth is round. I can figure it out for myself using basic physics. And they figured that out in 200 b.c., you're telling me you can't using modern technology?
What's the reason for faking the moon landings, genius? Who makes money or gains power?
The luciferian agenda of making man into his own god would be a pretty compelling reason, genius
Mate, you think you understand physics, yet can easily prove that you don’t understand the concept of “UP” with one simple question:
Q: do astronauts have to go UP, to get to the moon?
The answer is obviously YES,
So ask yourself why you absolutely, positively will never admit that the answer is YES.
Is it because your entire absurd narrative is dependant on you NOT understanding the concept of “UP”,
And that if you ever figured out what “UP” actually means, you couldnt believe your favorite fairy tale anymore?