please refrain from using the following arguments, because they are not yours, and they suck anyway,
If it was a hoax, Russia would have sent me a singing telegram
if it was a hoax, someone inside NASA would have talked to the newspapers who were also in on it.
theres a reflector on the moon, and they can hit it with a laser to measure distance to the moon. and yet, the reflector itself is so small, that you can't even see it with the worlds most powerful telescopes.
they brought back some rocks from the moon, that later turned out to be petrified wood.
Like you're coming up with your own unique take on why we didn't go to the moon, that you didn't just hear somewhere yourself.
I'm sorry, but you don't get to dictate the terms of the debate. I don't accept that, and you have no authority to enforce it.
As to your four points.
At the height of the Cold War, it would certainly behoove Russia to expose a fraud, and they had spies honeycombed throughout the defense network. But they didn't. Why?
If it was a hoax, the question isn't so much why it didn't get outed then, but the inevitable outing of it as a hoax in the future when man, continuing space exploration, would inevitably go to the moon again.
If you understood the vast gulfs of space and the limited power of the visual telescopes to see small objects you would drop this entirely as an objection. Even if there was pictures where you could see the rover, you'd call them fake. Still, you can see the disturbances on the ground caused by the missions, like seeing a hole that was dug even if you can't see the shovel.
God help you if you ever get charged with a crime and you've never heard of the concept of chain of custody. It is true is that meteorites thought from the moon get misidentified. It's also true that the moon used to be part of the earth and to layman they are indistinguishable. It's true there are hoaxes. It's also true that fake moon rocks show up from time to time without chain of custody, and occasionally real moon rocks do without chain of custody as well. But moon rocks with a chain of custody of NASA only ownership, that's not true.
Something tells me you havent even spent one whole minute working out the math or physics of your absurd story, and yet you still think you understand?
The more you actually learn about any given topic, the more you realize you don’t actually know anything at all.
The distance from the earth to the moon is between 225k and 250k miles, you're wrong right off the bat there mon ami. And the moon isn't really "up" when you're travelling to it, because you can go in a straight line. I stopped reading after that.
It's also very sad that you assume that just because I have a different truth than you, that man walked on the moon, that I'm not a pureblood? Total lack of logic, which impugns the rest of your arguments by extension.
There is only one truth, and that is that Americans have never had the tech necessary to travel to the moon and back, and Americans never will have that tech.
What you “assume” is truth, is just some left over cold war propaganda that you cant seem to let go of.
Think about it… why even go to the moon?
Theres no practical reason to go to the moon in the 1960-70s, especially when Americans were busy losing a war in vietnam.
Can you name one single practical application for putting a reflector on the moon?
To measure the distance to the moon slightly more accurately?
For what purpose? To what end?
Because that will help the USA win a war against the USSR?
Face it, chump, youve been played hard, and your over-inflated ego just wont allow you to admit it.
Keep it up though, im sure believing in bullshit doesnt have any real life consequences, other than people on the internet laughing at you for being so gullible and hard-headed.
please refrain from using the following arguments, because they are not yours, and they suck anyway,
If it was a hoax, Russia would have sent me a singing telegram
if it was a hoax, someone inside NASA would have talked to the newspapers who were also in on it.
theres a reflector on the moon, and they can hit it with a laser to measure distance to the moon. and yet, the reflector itself is so small, that you can't even see it with the worlds most powerful telescopes.
they brought back some rocks from the moon, that later turned out to be petrified wood.
Like you're coming up with your own unique take on why we didn't go to the moon, that you didn't just hear somewhere yourself.
I'm sorry, but you don't get to dictate the terms of the debate. I don't accept that, and you have no authority to enforce it.
As to your four points.
At the height of the Cold War, it would certainly behoove Russia to expose a fraud, and they had spies honeycombed throughout the defense network. But they didn't. Why?
If it was a hoax, the question isn't so much why it didn't get outed then, but the inevitable outing of it as a hoax in the future when man, continuing space exploration, would inevitably go to the moon again.
If you understood the vast gulfs of space and the limited power of the visual telescopes to see small objects you would drop this entirely as an objection. Even if there was pictures where you could see the rover, you'd call them fake. Still, you can see the disturbances on the ground caused by the missions, like seeing a hole that was dug even if you can't see the shovel.
God help you if you ever get charged with a crime and you've never heard of the concept of chain of custody. It is true is that meteorites thought from the moon get misidentified. It's also true that the moon used to be part of the earth and to layman they are indistinguishable. It's true there are hoaxes. It's also true that fake moon rocks show up from time to time without chain of custody, and occasionally real moon rocks do without chain of custody as well. But moon rocks with a chain of custody of NASA only ownership, that's not true.
I actually spent several years summerizing all of the math and physics into one easy to understand page, which you can review here:
https://i.redd.it/g287hbmcb94z.png
Something tells me you havent even spent one whole minute working out the math or physics of your absurd story, and yet you still think you understand?
The more you actually learn about any given topic, the more you realize you don’t actually know anything at all.
Look at your last vaccine, for example…
The distance from the earth to the moon is between 225k and 250k miles, you're wrong right off the bat there mon ami. And the moon isn't really "up" when you're travelling to it, because you can go in a straight line. I stopped reading after that.
It's also very sad that you assume that just because I have a different truth than you, that man walked on the moon, that I'm not a pureblood? Total lack of logic, which impugns the rest of your arguments by extension.
Ah yes, i forgot to mention that there are lots of intentional errors, for you to find and correct.
That part of the assignment is designed to make you use your brain for the first time in your life…
But i see you have already resorted to “thought-terminating cliche”,
which is the mental self-defense mechanism by which idiots are able to remain idiots.
“Let an idiot, remain an idiot”
~Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, crisis actor
So what you are saying is you literally don’t know up from down, or your ass from a hole in the ground?
https://conspiracies.win/p/17rm5ReMAX/x/c/4Tz2ZXkrSex
You dont have a “different truth”,
There is only one truth, and that is that Americans have never had the tech necessary to travel to the moon and back, and Americans never will have that tech.
What you “assume” is truth, is just some left over cold war propaganda that you cant seem to let go of.
Think about it… why even go to the moon?
Theres no practical reason to go to the moon in the 1960-70s, especially when Americans were busy losing a war in vietnam.
Can you name one single practical application for putting a reflector on the moon?
To measure the distance to the moon slightly more accurately?
For what purpose? To what end?
Because that will help the USA win a war against the USSR?
Face it, chump, youve been played hard, and your over-inflated ego just wont allow you to admit it.
Keep it up though, im sure believing in bullshit doesnt have any real life consequences, other than people on the internet laughing at you for being so gullible and hard-headed.