They aren't special effects, therefore, they don't have to be good or bad.
Come now, let's be adults here.
It's not that you are gullible, either, for believing wrong things. I suppose you are a fairly intelligent man, who came to the conclusions you did not by accident.
Do you remember when or where you learned the words "consume" or "contingency"? Probably not. That is a form of amnesia, believe it or not.
That's a long way of saying, I don't remember what evidence, learned in the past, convinced me. I have been on this earth over 4 decades now. If you want confirmatory evidence I've looked at recently, we can talk about that.
please refrain from using the following arguments, because they are not yours, and they suck anyway,
If it was a hoax, Russia would have sent me a singing telegram
if it was a hoax, someone inside NASA would have talked to the newspapers who were also in on it.
theres a reflector on the moon, and they can hit it with a laser to measure distance to the moon. and yet, the reflector itself is so small, that you can't even see it with the worlds most powerful telescopes.
they brought back some rocks from the moon, that later turned out to be petrified wood.
Like you're coming up with your own unique take on why we didn't go to the moon, that you didn't just hear somewhere yourself.
I'm sorry, but you don't get to dictate the terms of the debate. I don't accept that, and you have no authority to enforce it.
As to your four points.
At the height of the Cold War, it would certainly behoove Russia to expose a fraud, and they had spies honeycombed throughout the defense network. But they didn't. Why?
If it was a hoax, the question isn't so much why it didn't get outed then, but the inevitable outing of it as a hoax in the future when man, continuing space exploration, would inevitably go to the moon again.
If you understood the vast gulfs of space and the limited power of the visual telescopes to see small objects you would drop this entirely as an objection. Even if there was pictures where you could see the rover, you'd call them fake. Still, you can see the disturbances on the ground caused by the missions, like seeing a hole that was dug even if you can't see the shovel.
God help you if you ever get charged with a crime and you've never heard of the concept of chain of custody. It is true is that meteorites thought from the moon get misidentified. It's also true that the moon used to be part of the earth and to layman they are indistinguishable. It's true there are hoaxes. It's also true that fake moon rocks show up from time to time without chain of custody, and occasionally real moon rocks do without chain of custody as well. But moon rocks with a chain of custody of NASA only ownership, that's not true.
They aren't special effects, therefore, they don't have to be good or bad.
Come now, let's be adults here.
It's not that you are gullible, either, for believing wrong things. I suppose you are a fairly intelligent man, who came to the conclusions you did not by accident.
what actual evidence convinced you that white men walked on the moon?
Do you remember when or where you learned the words "consume" or "contingency"? Probably not. That is a form of amnesia, believe it or not.
That's a long way of saying, I don't remember what evidence, learned in the past, convinced me. I have been on this earth over 4 decades now. If you want confirmatory evidence I've looked at recently, we can talk about that.
What.....consume is like a 3rd grade word
Do you remember when you first learned it?
please refrain from using the following arguments, because they are not yours, and they suck anyway,
If it was a hoax, Russia would have sent me a singing telegram
if it was a hoax, someone inside NASA would have talked to the newspapers who were also in on it.
theres a reflector on the moon, and they can hit it with a laser to measure distance to the moon. and yet, the reflector itself is so small, that you can't even see it with the worlds most powerful telescopes.
they brought back some rocks from the moon, that later turned out to be petrified wood.
Like you're coming up with your own unique take on why we didn't go to the moon, that you didn't just hear somewhere yourself.
I'm sorry, but you don't get to dictate the terms of the debate. I don't accept that, and you have no authority to enforce it.
As to your four points.
At the height of the Cold War, it would certainly behoove Russia to expose a fraud, and they had spies honeycombed throughout the defense network. But they didn't. Why?
If it was a hoax, the question isn't so much why it didn't get outed then, but the inevitable outing of it as a hoax in the future when man, continuing space exploration, would inevitably go to the moon again.
If you understood the vast gulfs of space and the limited power of the visual telescopes to see small objects you would drop this entirely as an objection. Even if there was pictures where you could see the rover, you'd call them fake. Still, you can see the disturbances on the ground caused by the missions, like seeing a hole that was dug even if you can't see the shovel.
God help you if you ever get charged with a crime and you've never heard of the concept of chain of custody. It is true is that meteorites thought from the moon get misidentified. It's also true that the moon used to be part of the earth and to layman they are indistinguishable. It's true there are hoaxes. It's also true that fake moon rocks show up from time to time without chain of custody, and occasionally real moon rocks do without chain of custody as well. But moon rocks with a chain of custody of NASA only ownership, that's not true.