One day I'd like to take a deep dive exposing the jewish monopolist control of book publishing, textbook publishing, and their monopolist control of tell-lies-vision and FM radio airwaves. It's a huge body of research unto itself and would probably take years to thoroughly research and assemble and connect the dots.
The fact there is so much material exposes how easy it is to connect zionism and the material at hand, despite any google first page "fact checker" telling you that jewish ownership of media or publishing is a racist trope.
I can't help but notice that BeachMilk neglected to provide the date and source of this video. That can't be on purpose, can it?
Maybe she was trying to tell us we have to step more carefully when people like BeachMilk around who, rather than trying to share information and document, are trying to promote a message. Isn't that our criticism of mainstream media?
And frankly, yes, given innumerable disinfo agents and hordes of gullible and easily manipulable people around, I might actually raise a similar alert. Okay, well, I guess I just did.
Thank you for the context. Considering that this was from before the pandemic, and other transparent propaganda campaigns. I think it is important to note, as it may not reflect her current views and understanding, nor her new job parameters.
Well, yes, thank you for the link and it's precisely what I thought, but on the other hand it's also precisely not my point.
That is, BeastMilk posts it without this information, so everyone automatically thinks it's "news" and just happened. That's exactly the same technique the mainstream often uses when they wish to mislead people. Others may feel differently, but I object when anyone does such things. The notion that the ends justify the means underlies the vast majority of what the Elite do. Perhaps some think They are correct about that.
Taken from another angle, this is from 5 years ago. My views on a great many things have evolved over the last 5 years. Personally, I would be deeply suspicious of anyone whose views have not changed over that same period. I see that, as a rule, people can barely deal with a static world, let alone a dynamic one, so I always wish to bring this concept in when appropriate.
the same technique the mainstream often uses when they wish to mislead
a) the main stream (inception towards death) doesn't mislead, it directs those within (life)...other suggest the word "mainstream" to distract one from that.
b) same (inception towards death) generates differences (life)
c) TECHNOL'OGY, noun [Gr. art, and word or discourse.] aka artificial suggestion over natural perception.
the ends justify the means underlies the vast majority of what the Elite do
a) what if the consenting many represent the means of the suggesting few to gain control?
b) what if the few trick the many to apply justification to suggested ends, while tempting them to ignore perceivable origin aka that which "just is" (justice)?
Inception towards death represents that which just is, hence delivering justice to those living within...a life sentence with a death penalty.
My point was addressed to everyone who happened to read it, but thanks for demonstrating that many people don't actually get past the first few words.
And you're bugging me, aren't you? Seems like standards are pretty low around here. Isn't it embarrassing that this all gets recorded so everyone can see what you did and how I pointed it out?
There is no correct news. There hasn't been correct news since the news started airing the same 5 headlines globally. This occurred with the rise of the Internet. Late 90s. You can flick news channels the headlines are all the same. Why is this in a globe of 8 billion. Because stinkheads like you manipulate it. The news is nothing but propaganda infused, agenda driven nonsense, garbage coverage. It doesn't even inform today. There is no impartial coverage. There are subtle differences in local coverage, this tends to contain more actual news. But it stinks.
Take the news off Twitter. It is crap and it stinks. Or make write only channels if it needed actual coverage of actual events in real time.
Twitter ain't a News App, everybody has this. If it needed actual coverage of real time events, make write only channels. The rest is garbage. No point in even reading it. It cherry picks coverage. It then writes up little fantasies. Meanwhile it polices everybody commenting. Total freaking shite.
Stupid down vote. It's obvious. Broadcast only channels should be enforced. Or fuck Twitter thinking it's the news. It isn't broadcasting to anybody else. Cannot comment on it anyway. Am I right. Look at her suggestion. She just wants to preach little stupid narratives. As she polices everybody else not buying it. If the press wants to do this it should be live coverage only from official sources, broadcasting as read only. Otherwise people should comment about whatever the fuck they like. If the press weren't there, spewing propaganda, they literally could.
Correct news= published and approved by Jews
Incorrect news = the truth published by white gentiles from news organizations not owned by Jews.
She also added smack talk for people uploading privately recorded evidence.
So James Okeefe and private journalists such as Libs of TikTok aren't allowed on Twatter with her in charge?
Allowed, just not approved. They're exactly what the, "freedom of speech not freedom of reach" was designed to suppress.
One day I'd like to take a deep dive exposing the jewish monopolist control of book publishing, textbook publishing, and their monopolist control of tell-lies-vision and FM radio airwaves. It's a huge body of research unto itself and would probably take years to thoroughly research and assemble and connect the dots.
The fact there is so much material exposes how easy it is to connect zionism and the material at hand, despite any google first page "fact checker" telling you that jewish ownership of media or publishing is a racist trope.
"When I hear the word wrong-think, I reach for my gun”
-- some German guy
That's a whole lot of words to say, " legacy media isn't trusted. People trust media we don't want them to trust"
BAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHA THE FREAK SHOW CONTINUES
I can't help but notice that BeachMilk neglected to provide the date and source of this video. That can't be on purpose, can it?
Maybe she was trying to tell us we have to step more carefully when people like BeachMilk around who, rather than trying to share information and document, are trying to promote a message. Isn't that our criticism of mainstream media?
And frankly, yes, given innumerable disinfo agents and hordes of gullible and easily manipulable people around, I might actually raise a similar alert. Okay, well, I guess I just did.
Her views in 2018 are valid record.
She wouldn't be there if her thinking changed.
Thank you for the context. Considering that this was from before the pandemic, and other transparent propaganda campaigns. I think it is important to note, as it may not reflect her current views and understanding, nor her new job parameters.
Well, yes, thank you for the link and it's precisely what I thought, but on the other hand it's also precisely not my point.
That is, BeastMilk posts it without this information, so everyone automatically thinks it's "news" and just happened. That's exactly the same technique the mainstream often uses when they wish to mislead people. Others may feel differently, but I object when anyone does such things. The notion that the ends justify the means underlies the vast majority of what the Elite do. Perhaps some think They are correct about that.
Taken from another angle, this is from 5 years ago. My views on a great many things have evolved over the last 5 years. Personally, I would be deeply suspicious of anyone whose views have not changed over that same period. I see that, as a rule, people can barely deal with a static world, let alone a dynamic one, so I always wish to bring this concept in when appropriate.
a) the main stream (inception towards death) doesn't mislead, it directs those within (life)...other suggest the word "mainstream" to distract one from that.
b) same (inception towards death) generates differences (life)
c) TECHNOL'OGY, noun [Gr. art, and word or discourse.] aka artificial suggestion over natural perception.
a) what if the consenting many represent the means of the suggesting few to gain control?
b) what if the few trick the many to apply justification to suggested ends, while tempting them to ignore perceivable origin aka that which "just is" (justice)?
Inception towards death represents that which just is, hence delivering justice to those living within...a life sentence with a death penalty.
My point was addressed to everyone who happened to read it, but thanks for demonstrating that many people don't actually get past the first few words.
And you're bugging me, aren't you? Seems like standards are pretty low around here. Isn't it embarrassing that this all gets recorded so everyone can see what you did and how I pointed it out?
Sure you care. You cared enough to reply, didn't you? Lame, but keep trying and maybe you'll get better! You know, maybe.
Fuck off.
There is no correct news. There hasn't been correct news since the news started airing the same 5 headlines globally. This occurred with the rise of the Internet. Late 90s. You can flick news channels the headlines are all the same. Why is this in a globe of 8 billion. Because stinkheads like you manipulate it. The news is nothing but propaganda infused, agenda driven nonsense, garbage coverage. It doesn't even inform today. There is no impartial coverage. There are subtle differences in local coverage, this tends to contain more actual news. But it stinks.
Take the news off Twitter. It is crap and it stinks. Or make write only channels if it needed actual coverage of actual events in real time.
Twitter ain't a News App, everybody has this. If it needed actual coverage of real time events, make write only channels. The rest is garbage. No point in even reading it. It cherry picks coverage. It then writes up little fantasies. Meanwhile it polices everybody commenting. Total freaking shite.
Stupid down vote. It's obvious. Broadcast only channels should be enforced. Or fuck Twitter thinking it's the news. It isn't broadcasting to anybody else. Cannot comment on it anyway. Am I right. Look at her suggestion. She just wants to preach little stupid narratives. As she polices everybody else not buying it. If the press wants to do this it should be live coverage only from official sources, broadcasting as read only. Otherwise people should comment about whatever the fuck they like. If the press weren't there, spewing propaganda, they literally could.
a) perceivable NEWS (north; east; west; south) implies the perceiving ones at the center.
b) CORRECT, verb (Latin regere) - "to lead straight, rule"...inception towards death leads life straight.
c) wanting (correct) vs not wanting (incorrect) suggested, tempts one to ignore perceivable...