Well, yes, thank you for the link and it's precisely what I thought, but on the other hand it's also precisely not my point.
That is, BeastMilk posts it without this information, so everyone automatically thinks it's "news" and just happened. That's exactly the same technique the mainstream often uses when they wish to mislead people. Others may feel differently, but I object when anyone does such things. The notion that the ends justify the means underlies the vast majority of what the Elite do. Perhaps some think They are correct about that.
Taken from another angle, this is from 5 years ago. My views on a great many things have evolved over the last 5 years. Personally, I would be deeply suspicious of anyone whose views have not changed over that same period. I see that, as a rule, people can barely deal with a static world, let alone a dynamic one, so I always wish to bring this concept in when appropriate.
the same technique the mainstream often uses when they wish to mislead
a) the main stream (inception towards death) doesn't mislead, it directs those within (life)...other suggest the word "mainstream" to distract one from that.
b) same (inception towards death) generates differences (life)
c) TECHNOL'OGY, noun [Gr. art, and word or discourse.] aka artificial suggestion over natural perception.
the ends justify the means underlies the vast majority of what the Elite do
a) what if the consenting many represent the means of the suggesting few to gain control?
b) what if the few trick the many to apply justification to suggested ends, while tempting them to ignore perceivable origin aka that which "just is" (justice)?
Inception towards death represents that which just is, hence delivering justice to those living within...a life sentence with a death penalty.
My point was addressed to everyone who happened to read it, but thanks for demonstrating that many people don't actually get past the first few words.
And you're bugging me, aren't you? Seems like standards are pretty low around here. Isn't it embarrassing that this all gets recorded so everyone can see what you did and how I pointed it out?
Well, yes, thank you for the link and it's precisely what I thought, but on the other hand it's also precisely not my point.
That is, BeastMilk posts it without this information, so everyone automatically thinks it's "news" and just happened. That's exactly the same technique the mainstream often uses when they wish to mislead people. Others may feel differently, but I object when anyone does such things. The notion that the ends justify the means underlies the vast majority of what the Elite do. Perhaps some think They are correct about that.
Taken from another angle, this is from 5 years ago. My views on a great many things have evolved over the last 5 years. Personally, I would be deeply suspicious of anyone whose views have not changed over that same period. I see that, as a rule, people can barely deal with a static world, let alone a dynamic one, so I always wish to bring this concept in when appropriate.
a) the main stream (inception towards death) doesn't mislead, it directs those within (life)...other suggest the word "mainstream" to distract one from that.
b) same (inception towards death) generates differences (life)
c) TECHNOL'OGY, noun [Gr. art, and word or discourse.] aka artificial suggestion over natural perception.
a) what if the consenting many represent the means of the suggesting few to gain control?
b) what if the few trick the many to apply justification to suggested ends, while tempting them to ignore perceivable origin aka that which "just is" (justice)?
Inception towards death represents that which just is, hence delivering justice to those living within...a life sentence with a death penalty.
My point was addressed to everyone who happened to read it, but thanks for demonstrating that many people don't actually get past the first few words.
And you're bugging me, aren't you? Seems like standards are pretty low around here. Isn't it embarrassing that this all gets recorded so everyone can see what you did and how I pointed it out?
Sure you care. You cared enough to reply, didn't you? Lame, but keep trying and maybe you'll get better! You know, maybe.