can't put my finger on it, but those "survivor" accounts seem to be missing something...
(media.conspiracies.win)
Comments (11)
sorted by:
http://vho.org/GB/Books/trr/1.html
ty!
It's a topic that stirs too much reprisal. But there is so much information that questions the narrative.
It was a narrative that sought retribution, wielding it to the full extent of recourse. Do I disagree with it. I cannot answer.
Because it has always happened in history, and history is no stranger to it. The winner rewrites history, to the victor go the spoils. As any loser's entire lineage is wiped out, shamed, and destroyed. Nothing has changed in history except for the rhetoric. Parading itself as some other cause. Nope it's primal.
It has happened throughout history as far back as history began, and as brutally. Why would I care. They won and justice inserted its dominance. It sought nothing else apart from crushing its foes completely less it repeat itself. Somehow it always does regardless, in some form or another, because a paradox occurs. It will be no different the next time. No matter who claims victory and inserts their form of justice.
Someone posted this yesterday.
The Secret Holocaust - The real holocaust was a Christian Holocaust by Jews of sixty-six million, mostly Christians. By Eustace Mullins 7-8-9 https://rense.com//general86/realholo.htm
Most of the jews who died in prison work camps died of starvation and that was because the allied forces blockades the German Nazi territory and prevented any supplies from coming in and attacked their agricultural industry. White Germans were hungry too. Of course, prisoners are the last ones to eat when good people are hungry too. The allies actually killed most of the Jews during WWII.
Also what the xenophobic DemoKKKrats and Republicans never tell you is that Russians helped the USA win both WWI and WWII. Russia was under the control of Jews during this time. Jew Bolsheviks. The real Holocaust happened in Russia when Jews slaughtered over 60 million white Christians and sold off the nation's agriculture (food) for military equipment and other industrial commodities that Jews needed to establish their regime.
Throughout much of history, jews were slaughtering white people by means of starvation/manufactured famine/eugenics/abortions/fake vaccines/wars. And by war, i mean Jews tricking white people into fighting each other or fighting wars that had no benefit to white people other than fiat jew bankers possibly ripping them off less.
When you realize how fucking evil jews are, you begin to give less of a shit about some blacks looting the corporate retail outlet that fucking hates you and black people alike.
Because "winning" represents the suggested rhetoric to distract from the ongoing war.
Everything exists within constant change...."nothing" represents the suggested rhetoric to distract one from comprehending this.
Zyklon B was a de-lousing agent.
Every good lie starts with a grain of truth.
Just because you never read something or you never saw something doesn't mean it never happened or doesn't exist. It just might mean you're not well informed.....
I wonder why you never hear about carbon monoxide poisoning victims being red, you would think that according to op that would be the most lasting image on your mind.
I wonder why it took so long to diagnose the people who were accidentally gassed in poorly made mexican hotels.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09nB7fH6km4
But yes, if I came across a pit full of human corpses, especially if it had been more than a day or two at a warm time of the year. :| the last thing your gonna pay attention to is the color of the skin.
Then if they were really as starved as they prolly were, thats where they first started studying refeeding syndrome, which funny enough has to do with your levels of phosphorous.
Id proably be more inclined to remember the bones and stretched skin and oh yeah, the giant fucking pile of bodies, more than the color of their skin.
I didn't see any account of body skin color being anything different than red, either. No reports of blue or tan or white or yellow...
Failing to report on a detail doesn't make the detail cease to exist. OP would be infinitely more persuasive by showing us some historical accounts that specifically mention non-red/pink skin.
Maybe one day OP will get his house burned down, but the criminal will get away because no one mentioned the color of the ash.
Edit: the Naziroos hate me but can't refute what I say. Downvotes without rational argument.
We can refute you...
Here, Survivor Testimony. Go to 1:57 and he mentions the victims being 'black and blue from the gas'. This particular 'survivor' even shows up in the holocaust hall of fame, so to speak (on the USC website), so I suppose he's 'trusted'.
So: an explicit 'eyewitness testimony' from someone who is lauded as a 'survivor' that mentions black/blue-ish bodies, but not bright pink/red.
Remember -- this isn't 'nazi' revisionism -- this is the USC shoah foundation promoted by Spielberg etc.
Still think we're 'irrational'?
Not nearly as much. Thanks for the link and context.