can't put my finger on it, but those "survivor" accounts seem to be missing something...
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (11)
sorted by:
I didn't see any account of body skin color being anything different than red, either. No reports of blue or tan or white or yellow...
Failing to report on a detail doesn't make the detail cease to exist. OP would be infinitely more persuasive by showing us some historical accounts that specifically mention non-red/pink skin.
Maybe one day OP will get his house burned down, but the criminal will get away because no one mentioned the color of the ash.
Edit: the Naziroos hate me but can't refute what I say. Downvotes without rational argument.
We can refute you...
Here, Survivor Testimony. Go to 1:57 and he mentions the victims being 'black and blue from the gas'. This particular 'survivor' even shows up in the holocaust hall of fame, so to speak (on the USC website), so I suppose he's 'trusted'.
So: an explicit 'eyewitness testimony' from someone who is lauded as a 'survivor' that mentions black/blue-ish bodies, but not bright pink/red.
Remember -- this isn't 'nazi' revisionism -- this is the USC shoah foundation promoted by Spielberg etc.
Still think we're 'irrational'?
Not nearly as much. Thanks for the link and context.