Just as a point of analysis, we can notice that Russia doesn't have much to say about this latest "bombshell", whatever it's source or veracity. Or one may say equally that Russia has made comment about such matters many times, all to no effect.
It should be understood that the Russians understand--and regrettably so--that we are at a time when words have failed to change conditions, and new truths will be created with drones, tanks, and artillery shells.
This is what they are doing now and will keep doing until all the goals are achieved. And they do not care what anyone's opinion is. Obviously not, and why would they? If someone felt so strongly in opposition, what might they do? Show up on the battlefield and try to kill them? It's already happening.
It seems quite transparent, but I find little analysis that reflects this.
I know it could sound crazy, but is there in US some relatively powerful group with good relations with MSM that could be very disappointed about a long and enormous money flow to the US MIC that is much bigger than theirs? May be one that suddenly get money flow cuts when narrative changed not so long ago?
This "leak" could be their job. :)
Popcorn time. BigPharma fighting with MIC. :) There exist Russian phrase for describing that kind of situations - "the toad is fucking the adder" or vice versa.
The UK and the BBC has repeatedly aired it has special forces on the ground. Distinctly aired it. It has also been through Parliament.
Please look up Press around Boris Johnson visit.
Prior it was aired when Gavin Williamson was in Office as War minister. Specifically direct aid and training packages. Prior to Rissian direct involvement.
It has been specifically aired in regards to training. Mercs have been constantly aired. They were even exchanged. Put out in the press.
When the Prince went to Poland who did he address. Static Nato battalions. Or did they have a direct role. Hence his address.
The new tanks for example. What were they aired with?
What was the training aired with the Neptune missile? Artillery packages?
BBC are so full of it. They are right they won't give direct figures. Nobody does. Perhaps in training capacity it provides smaller descriptions. But clandestine. No. Those might have been compiled on a Ukraine or otherwise registry. But it would be stupid.
In fact similar press has been aired by the rest of Nato. France. Canada. America. So many others.
It is what it is. It has been in the press constantly.
It’s one thing to report on an open secret and another to have documents that can be used to directly hold specific people accountable in congressional inquiries.
This is confirmation that Biden went around congress.
Anyone savvy in congress already knew this but now they have to deal with a political environment where there is hard proof to show that.
It changes things.
Anyone who pushes back too much will be sending obvious signals that they’ve been cashing in on the ruse, imo.
It could very well be low tier information as in paper publicised to a community of personnel who need a brief overview. Not much different to other press. 'propaganda driven, often inflated, speculates, often among certain facts, prompting reaction, or outlining them'.
It could be directly fed misinformation.
It could be manipulated information.
Is it factual not entirely. Status of review. Nobody particularly takes much time over all the inflated details. Rather it's a report from a more exclusive source outside of other media.
It looked like a pretty little presentation to the point of it being a video game, made for people who don't need all the Intel and key points, rather an outlook of them.
An outlook not subjected to very many audits or indeed a changing battlefield. Just a weekly run down.
Who knows and who cares. What has it immediately caused. That information to change. Denial. Speculation. Propaganda.
Topically anybody following the press, or their government on this conflict knows some boots are on the ground to limited and clandestine activity it has been no secret. It has been stated repeatedly by many nations providing support. Mercs are operating openly. Those numbers aren't in status reports and would otherwise be inaccurate. Although perhaps they are recorded? Dubiously
How was it all audited? Any clearance becomes much higher than a weekly blog.
If propaganda and spin re: volunteers who are American, then oh well.
If true and there are active enlistment contracts on the ground, then he has 60 days before congress can shut it down. Set an egg timer.
War is Profit Killing people is glorized over Sex
Can you show those documents please?
https://cryptome.org/2023/04/Leaked-Classified-Docs.zip
Just as a point of analysis, we can notice that Russia doesn't have much to say about this latest "bombshell", whatever it's source or veracity. Or one may say equally that Russia has made comment about such matters many times, all to no effect.
It should be understood that the Russians understand--and regrettably so--that we are at a time when words have failed to change conditions, and new truths will be created with drones, tanks, and artillery shells.
This is what they are doing now and will keep doing until all the goals are achieved. And they do not care what anyone's opinion is. Obviously not, and why would they? If someone felt so strongly in opposition, what might they do? Show up on the battlefield and try to kill them? It's already happening.
It seems quite transparent, but I find little analysis that reflects this.
I know it could sound crazy, but is there in US some relatively powerful group with good relations with MSM that could be very disappointed about a long and enormous money flow to the US MIC that is much bigger than theirs? May be one that suddenly get money flow cuts when narrative changed not so long ago?
This "leak" could be their job. :)
Popcorn time. BigPharma fighting with MIC. :) There exist Russian phrase for describing that kind of situations - "the toad is fucking the adder" or vice versa.
No "leaks" the MSM mentions are real. All staged. Real leakers get killed.
That is why I took "leak" in quotes. :)
I figured, I just wanted to emphasize your quotes, for the people in the back lol.
The msm mentioned collateral damage and those were real.
You think Cheney wanted Murdoch to let that air on Fox News?
Yet it happened.
Shitty logic. I’m honestly suspect of people here discouraging people from looking at the leaks.
So far they look authentic.
Apparently the files are hosted here:
https://cryptome.org/2023/04/Leaked-Classified-Docs.zip
Although this is about 18 pages. From my understanding there is more out there somewhere.
I saw reporting that said around 100 pages total but could be wrong about that.
Where are the full leaks?
Moron don't know shit.
Gonna discourage people from looking like a good little shill?
And apparently you don’t know how to read.
more lies and stupid shit from this obvious simp.
Your account is a joke criminal.
So the shill account doesn’t want us to look at the pentagon leaks? Why is that?
That helps me narrow it down a bit, tbh.
You’re a joke, shill.
You are a fucking moron simp.
Who cares why the pentagon intentionally leaked some useless garbage.
Nothing there is new, only a moron would think there is anything valid there.
The reality is, the criminals in charge have stooped to a new level of stupid when they hired the likes of you.
hahah, useless fuckwit.
Gatekeep harder fed boi
The UK and the BBC has repeatedly aired it has special forces on the ground. Distinctly aired it. It has also been through Parliament.
Please look up Press around Boris Johnson visit.
Prior it was aired when Gavin Williamson was in Office as War minister. Specifically direct aid and training packages. Prior to Rissian direct involvement.
It has been specifically aired in regards to training. Mercs have been constantly aired. They were even exchanged. Put out in the press.
When the Prince went to Poland who did he address. Static Nato battalions. Or did they have a direct role. Hence his address.
The new tanks for example. What were they aired with?
What was the training aired with the Neptune missile? Artillery packages?
BBC are so full of it. They are right they won't give direct figures. Nobody does. Perhaps in training capacity it provides smaller descriptions. But clandestine. No. Those might have been compiled on a Ukraine or otherwise registry. But it would be stupid.
In fact similar press has been aired by the rest of Nato. France. Canada. America. So many others.
It is what it is. It has been in the press constantly.
It’s one thing to report on an open secret and another to have documents that can be used to directly hold specific people accountable in congressional inquiries.
This is confirmation that Biden went around congress.
Anyone savvy in congress already knew this but now they have to deal with a political environment where there is hard proof to show that.
It changes things.
Anyone who pushes back too much will be sending obvious signals that they’ve been cashing in on the ruse, imo.
It could very well be low tier information as in paper publicised to a community of personnel who need a brief overview. Not much different to other press. 'propaganda driven, often inflated, speculates, often among certain facts, prompting reaction, or outlining them'.
It could be directly fed misinformation.
It could be manipulated information.
Is it factual not entirely. Status of review. Nobody particularly takes much time over all the inflated details. Rather it's a report from a more exclusive source outside of other media.
It looked like a pretty little presentation to the point of it being a video game, made for people who don't need all the Intel and key points, rather an outlook of them.
An outlook not subjected to very many audits or indeed a changing battlefield. Just a weekly run down.
Who knows and who cares. What has it immediately caused. That information to change. Denial. Speculation. Propaganda.
Topically anybody following the press, or their government on this conflict knows some boots are on the ground to limited and clandestine activity it has been no secret. It has been stated repeatedly by many nations providing support. Mercs are operating openly. Those numbers aren't in status reports and would otherwise be inaccurate. Although perhaps they are recorded? Dubiously
How was it all audited? Any clearance becomes much higher than a weekly blog.
No it doesn't.
Can you please provide this proof?
The tweet from the nobody you linked said UK.