The UK and the BBC has repeatedly aired it has special forces on the ground. Distinctly aired it. It has also been through Parliament.
Please look up Press around Boris Johnson visit.
Prior it was aired when Gavin Williamson was in Office as War minister. Specifically direct aid and training packages. Prior to Rissian direct involvement.
It has been specifically aired in regards to training. Mercs have been constantly aired. They were even exchanged. Put out in the press.
When the Prince went to Poland who did he address. Static Nato battalions. Or did they have a direct role. Hence his address.
The new tanks for example. What were they aired with?
What was the training aired with the Neptune missile? Artillery packages?
BBC are so full of it. They are right they won't give direct figures. Nobody does. Perhaps in training capacity it provides smaller descriptions. But clandestine. No. Those might have been compiled on a Ukraine or otherwise registry. But it would be stupid.
In fact similar press has been aired by the rest of Nato. France. Canada. America. So many others.
It is what it is. It has been in the press constantly.
It’s one thing to report on an open secret and another to have documents that can be used to directly hold specific people accountable in congressional inquiries.
This is confirmation that Biden went around congress.
Anyone savvy in congress already knew this but now they have to deal with a political environment where there is hard proof to show that.
It changes things.
Anyone who pushes back too much will be sending obvious signals that they’ve been cashing in on the ruse, imo.
It could very well be low tier information as in paper publicised to a community of personnel who need a brief overview. Not much different to other press. 'propaganda driven, often inflated, speculates, often among certain facts, prompting reaction, or outlining them'.
It could be directly fed misinformation.
It could be manipulated information.
Is it factual not entirely. Status of review. Nobody particularly takes much time over all the inflated details. Rather it's a report from a more exclusive source outside of other media.
It looked like a pretty little presentation to the point of it being a video game, made for people who don't need all the Intel and key points, rather an outlook of them.
An outlook not subjected to very many audits or indeed a changing battlefield. Just a weekly run down.
Who knows and who cares. What has it immediately caused. That information to change. Denial. Speculation. Propaganda.
Topically anybody following the press, or their government on this conflict knows some boots are on the ground to limited and clandestine activity it has been no secret. It has been stated repeatedly by many nations providing support. Mercs are operating openly. Those numbers aren't in status reports and would otherwise be inaccurate. Although perhaps they are recorded? Dubiously
How was it all audited? Any clearance becomes much higher than a weekly blog.
The UK and the BBC has repeatedly aired it has special forces on the ground. Distinctly aired it. It has also been through Parliament.
Please look up Press around Boris Johnson visit.
Prior it was aired when Gavin Williamson was in Office as War minister. Specifically direct aid and training packages. Prior to Rissian direct involvement.
It has been specifically aired in regards to training. Mercs have been constantly aired. They were even exchanged. Put out in the press.
When the Prince went to Poland who did he address. Static Nato battalions. Or did they have a direct role. Hence his address.
The new tanks for example. What were they aired with?
What was the training aired with the Neptune missile? Artillery packages?
BBC are so full of it. They are right they won't give direct figures. Nobody does. Perhaps in training capacity it provides smaller descriptions. But clandestine. No. Those might have been compiled on a Ukraine or otherwise registry. But it would be stupid.
In fact similar press has been aired by the rest of Nato. France. Canada. America. So many others.
It is what it is. It has been in the press constantly.
It’s one thing to report on an open secret and another to have documents that can be used to directly hold specific people accountable in congressional inquiries.
This is confirmation that Biden went around congress.
Anyone savvy in congress already knew this but now they have to deal with a political environment where there is hard proof to show that.
It changes things.
Anyone who pushes back too much will be sending obvious signals that they’ve been cashing in on the ruse, imo.
It could very well be low tier information as in paper publicised to a community of personnel who need a brief overview. Not much different to other press. 'propaganda driven, often inflated, speculates, often among certain facts, prompting reaction, or outlining them'.
It could be directly fed misinformation.
It could be manipulated information.
Is it factual not entirely. Status of review. Nobody particularly takes much time over all the inflated details. Rather it's a report from a more exclusive source outside of other media.
It looked like a pretty little presentation to the point of it being a video game, made for people who don't need all the Intel and key points, rather an outlook of them.
An outlook not subjected to very many audits or indeed a changing battlefield. Just a weekly run down.
Who knows and who cares. What has it immediately caused. That information to change. Denial. Speculation. Propaganda.
Topically anybody following the press, or their government on this conflict knows some boots are on the ground to limited and clandestine activity it has been no secret. It has been stated repeatedly by many nations providing support. Mercs are operating openly. Those numbers aren't in status reports and would otherwise be inaccurate. Although perhaps they are recorded? Dubiously
How was it all audited? Any clearance becomes much higher than a weekly blog.