I came across this post on Gab, with this picture
The Nashville shooter's shoes changed.
I decided to check the video myself. On this school surveillance video, at 1:32, you can clearly see the shooter wearing one type of shoes. On this police bodycam footage video, at 5:57, the shooter is clearly wearing a different pair of shoes.
Possible false flag.
I believe all mass shootings in US, at least during my lifetime, they all have been false flag operations, (PSYOPs). This one is no different.
"Possible false flag."
It IS and was a false flag and thank you for pointing this example of the shoes out. Yet another sloppy attempt to tug at the hearts of people across the world and manipulate us into believing this psyop is real. Another attempt to distract from jab deaths among other things and to challenge yet again 2A.
The freemasons took notes from the things failed (which was alot) at Uvalde and this time they had footage of scripted drill ready to go. School's address is 33. The teaching body at this school 33. These masons love their symbolism and numbers. no one injured because they can't have any loose strings messing up the narrative in an interview that might lead to more questions.
So far they have what....white, black, hispanic and the only thing that was missing was a girl shooter. AND oh boy! a tranny!!! yay "we did it boys n girls we diversified our school shooting fuckery!" hows that for diversity and inclusion.
Wow, just confirmed, 33 Burton Hills...
Here's a 1080p of both vids:
https://youtu.be/gK_DbxAciho
Skip to 1:00 and 8:10.
I zoomed and scrolled back and forth through each footage, numerous times, and I think there is little chance that these are the same shoes. The soles in the hallway footage taper toward the back, while the soles in the shooting scene are mostly flat, while tapering slightly in the front. The hallway shows some kind of weird lace situation (like lace free shoes or something), while the shooting scene shows a narrow white horizontal-ish stripe on the sides and normal laces.
Thanks for the higher res video. I keep hearing people say that the school surveillance video utilizes a crappy camera, resulting in blending the yellow of the flame with the white line of the shoe, but it doesn't look like that. It also doesn't make sense, because the camo pattern pants and the carpet don't have weird artifacting like that (at 1:07 in your video), both of which has much finer detailing than the shoes, and the colors in the surveillance video are clear and delineated everywhere else. Look at the paper to the right of the printer (at 1:07), which has clear and distinct fine markings in different colors. If the surveillance camera can show that detail, it shouldn't mess up the shoes as much as is claimed.
I agree. However, and I haven't commented on this yet, but last night I spent quite a bit of time analyzing the video further, including taking screenshots and straightening them out to do side-by-side comparisons, and I actually think something even weirder might be happening.
So, while I was looking at the pictures next to each other, the screenshots I took, I noticed that it does in fact look like the same shoe (the flame one) in both cases (the footage that comes right after the initial hallway footage, where there is some terra-cotta colored tile, gives a clearer view). But this is where it gets weird. In most frames there appears to be some kind of artifact on the shoes that is unnatural, including an area that is entirely rectangular that overlaps the rubber outer sole. It's almost as if somebody intentionally made the security footage appear to be a different shoe by modifying the video, which is exactly the kind of nonsense that we saw after 9/11, things that appear to have been inserted into the evidence to send "conspiracy theorists" on a goose-chase.
Here are some screenshots I took:
The first shot shows the flame shoes in the shooting scene, but the second shot shows an example of that rectangular area that you can see overlapping the outer rubber sole. I understand video artifacts can come from compression algorithms, etc., but this artifact is too convenient. The artifact seems like somebody added a rectangular white area and then it dipped too low when she was stepping down, like her foot stopped but the rectangle continued for another centimeter (like the nose cone of the airplane coming out the other side of the building, re: 9/11). What's even stranger is that you can see what appears to be a drop shadow below the rectangle. There isn't any object that would be causing this drop shadow in either of the shoe models shown in the OP. It's like a digital object was dragged in place and actually had a shadow.
I don't know what to think exactly, but I definitely don't think that the shoe we are seeing here is the Puma shoe.
Thanks for the extra screenshots. I still think they're different shoes, but you're right, the white square and shadow below it (especially in the 2nd pic) looks fake and manipulated.
Exactly man, I just made a full post about this to get more attention on it also:
https://conspiracies.win/p/16amYf6gl9/
I kinda figured this was a psy-op.....empty parking lot, fast turnaround for body camera footage, no blood on crime scene, arm coloring looks strange, and now the shoes are different. This usually precedes legislation which takes your rights away....Remember everything on TV is a lie anyway so why would this be the exception.....
What's Alex Jones' take on this?
Supposedly this tranny was former student of this school.
How did a Christian school mislead a child so much?
If you were a child inside a Christian church, wouldn't you learn about Jesus Christ and love and learn there are two genders and God created man (Adam) and took from him his rib and created Eve?
So how did she become confused with genders and become so depressed and nihilist and suffer with her own identity and not go to Christian leaders for advice or help?
How long did this girl audrey attend this school and why did she hold resentment against it? Was she perhaps traumatized by something that occurred inside the school? Is there more to the story? Anything to explain genuine motive?
Many tranny kids are indoctrinated by their parents, especially their mothers. The corrupted degenerate globalist controlled society can also play a huge role. Keep in mind that a lot of Western people spend most of their time online, in echo chambers, which can cause brainwashing all on their own. From the stories coming out about this shooting, it looks like the mom was likely responsible, as she was an avid anti-gunner. Most lefty NPCs parrot the mainstream media verbatim, so she also likely kowtows the LGBTQ tranny programming too.
Nothing burger, low res cameras have bad white balance.
What? Even the design of the shoes is different.
Yep to me they are very different. Beyond the color.
I went through it frame by frame. Even in the body cam footage you see the Puma at first and the Van second. I don't think reds and yellows show up well on those low res cameras. Even those high end Axis security cameras vary wildly on color accuracy. The hallway look well lit on the security cam but not from the cop cam. The camera is probably just upping the light gain. Most do that automatically (because the point of a security camera is to capture everything at the best light levels possible.
I could be wrong, but I think this is a nothing burger.
https://files.catbox.moe/p9rfur.jpeg
https://files.catbox.moe/tiarca.jpeg
alright, I went back through the local news station clip I got straight from their website ... yea ... those look like different shoes
https://transfer.sh/eGiweq/3.jpeg
I really don't know man...
Yeah, even without the color difference, you can tell just by the design, they're different shoes.
Different cameras and different lighting specifically muting the red/yellow flame design could make it appear like different shoes. My guess is that they're the same shoes in all the angles. It's suuuuuuch a stupid mistake to make if the ordeal was staged.
Are y'all even watching the videos I posted? The two videos have enough detail to see that both the color and design of the shoes is different.
I watched the videos, looked at the stills and yes I can see why you might think they are different shoes. But I am saying that shitty cameras and shitty lighting can make the shoes look different. Look at hootersmcboobies screenshots above. It's the same camera shot a few seconds apart and the shoes look different.
I am as much a conspiracy person as the next person, but this one doesn't seem to have any legs.
Someone else posted this higher res video with both the school surveillance footage, and the bodycam footage. The relevant time stamps are at 1:07 and 8:14.
If the school surveillance video is crappy and artifacting/blending the colors of the yellow flame and white line of the shoe, then why doesn't the camera do the same thing to the camo pants, or to the carpet, which has much finer detailing? Look at the paper just to the right of the printer at 1:07, which has fine detailed markings in clearly different colors. If it can show that, it shouldn't mess up the shoes that badly.
Digital camera artifacting is due to the lack of resolution of the camera, where a color "block" (pixel) of one area gets blended with another. However, we can obviously see that much finer detail exists in the surveillance video, specifically with the carpet and the paper to the right of the printer. That camera should've been able to show the clear delineation of colors on the shoes.
I agree. I also don’t see how the shoes would be relevant to anything.
As a thought experiment… Maybe they did have different shoes.
What would that indicate? That they put on a second pair.
Maybe they found them. Maybe they brought a second pair. Maybe they took one from the school, or a student.
I don’t see how that changes anything from a conspiracy scenario.
It’s plausible it’s a false flag, but I don’t see the relevancy of the shoes lol.
From a conspiracy perspective, different shoes would suggest the possibility of the event not having been filmed as presented — in other words, the possibility that the entirety of the film, which is said to cover a time span of less than a half hour, was possibly filmed on different days.
Also, from an overall generic conspiracy perspective — going as far back as a decade or more, & over multiple tragic public events — a lot of conspiracy-minded people have developed the strong belief that shoes are a sign/symbol that it’s fake.
Disagree. Both your images are clearly the Van. Look how sharp the thine white line is in both of your images. I could see thinking the first image didn't have flames but it is clearly Van not Puma.