I came across this post on Gab, with this picture
The Nashville shooter's shoes changed.
I decided to check the video myself. On this school surveillance video, at 1:32, you can clearly see the shooter wearing one type of shoes. On this police bodycam footage video, at 5:57, the shooter is clearly wearing a different pair of shoes.
Possible false flag.
Different cameras and different lighting specifically muting the red/yellow flame design could make it appear like different shoes. My guess is that they're the same shoes in all the angles. It's suuuuuuch a stupid mistake to make if the ordeal was staged.
Are y'all even watching the videos I posted? The two videos have enough detail to see that both the color and design of the shoes is different.
I watched the videos, looked at the stills and yes I can see why you might think they are different shoes. But I am saying that shitty cameras and shitty lighting can make the shoes look different. Look at hootersmcboobies screenshots above. It's the same camera shot a few seconds apart and the shoes look different.
I am as much a conspiracy person as the next person, but this one doesn't seem to have any legs.
Someone else posted this higher res video with both the school surveillance footage, and the bodycam footage. The relevant time stamps are at 1:07 and 8:14.
If the school surveillance video is crappy and artifacting/blending the colors of the yellow flame and white line of the shoe, then why doesn't the camera do the same thing to the camo pants, or to the carpet, which has much finer detailing? Look at the paper just to the right of the printer at 1:07, which has fine detailed markings in clearly different colors. If it can show that, it shouldn't mess up the shoes that badly.
Digital camera artifacting is due to the lack of resolution of the camera, where a color "block" (pixel) of one area gets blended with another. However, we can obviously see that much finer detail exists in the surveillance video, specifically with the carpet and the paper to the right of the printer. That camera should've been able to show the clear delineation of colors on the shoes.
I agree. I also don’t see how the shoes would be relevant to anything.
As a thought experiment… Maybe they did have different shoes.
What would that indicate? That they put on a second pair.
Maybe they found them. Maybe they brought a second pair. Maybe they took one from the school, or a student.
I don’t see how that changes anything from a conspiracy scenario.
It’s plausible it’s a false flag, but I don’t see the relevancy of the shoes lol.
From a conspiracy perspective, different shoes would suggest the possibility of the event not having been filmed as presented — in other words, the possibility that the entirety of the film, which is said to cover a time span of less than a half hour, was possibly filmed on different days.
Also, from an overall generic conspiracy perspective — going as far back as a decade or more, & over multiple tragic public events — a lot of conspiracy-minded people have developed the strong belief that shoes are a sign/symbol that it’s fake.