It really is amazing how much we allow them to screw us
(media.scored.co)
Comments (33)
sorted by:
vote harder.. 2024
I wonder if we can we write in Guillotine.
spoiler alert... it wont be counted...
I've said it before and I'll keep saying it: voting costs you nothing, so you might as well do it just in case of the off chance that you are wrong. Just don't put your faith in voting, and do other things to protect yourself and your community.
You’re a slave and will die a slave.
You always pop out of the woodwork whenever I tell people to vote. You seem very insistent that people here don't vote, or participate in the civic process at all. Even when it costs them and you nothing. why?
It’s not a large website.
Yes, you’re reading from the same script you always read from. Identical, copied and pasted responses because your employment depends on it.
Does cost. Kill yourself. You’re not fooling anyone.
a) suggested CIVIC (city) implies surrounding a center. What if that represents the inversion of being center (perceiving) of surrounding (perceivable)?
b) does one really own a civic DUTY (that which a person owes to another) or does each one (life) need to adapt to being processed (inception towards death)?
What if perceivable represents value and each one perceiving represents evaluation? Can there be a higher value than evaluation? What if the whole (process of dying) represents the cost, and each partial (living) the price? Why is it called PAY (to discharge a debt) MENT (mind; memory)?
Does free "will" of choice imply slavery to others? What if will represents ones want to submit to others, while ignoring the need to resist temptations? What if want represents the temptation for need?
Submission can be either with or without consent, of course.
a) MISSION (act of sending, a dispatching; a release) + SUB (under) aka inception towards death (mission) sending; dispatching and releasing life (sub)....
b) being sub (life) within mission (inception towards death) implies resisting as choice, not consenting to choices.
c) try this...if you ever find yourself in submission to another...notice that you can always choose to go deeper or higher, hence representing free will of choice.
Suggested submission represents a distraction; tempting one to ignore being sub within mission.
d) suggested "of course" tempts one (life) to ignore being within course (inception towards death).
e) suggested "without" represents the inversion of living "within" the process of dying aka center (perceiving) within surrounding (perceivable).
f) CON (against) SENT (Latin sentire; to perceive)...hence consenting to suggested; while ignoring perceivable.
"the mark of insanity is repeating the same objective expecting different results"
I'm not expecting different results, I'm hoping. I have no illusions that voting won't do much, if anything. but I repeat and I repeat again: It costs you nothing.
If I could play a free game of roulette for a chance at a million dollars every year, I would play it every time even though I probably would never win. so long as the chances there.
it's the same with voting. There is that glimmer of hope that's all is not lost. so long as you vote that glimmer stays alive. It costs nothing therefore there is nothing to lose and everything to gain.
comparing gambling to voting is not the same thing...
also in roulette you have a 1 in 36 chance of hitting the 00 and everyone loses...
a) gamblers are addicted to loss; voters always lose. Both represent shirking of response-ability (free will of choice) onto the suggested choices of others.
b) sameness (process of dying) generates differences (living)...others tempt one to ignore perceivable differences for suggested sameness, like equality (same) through diversity (difference)...
It. Costs. Nothing.
The only reason I can think of for someone to encourage others to not vote is if they want to keep them out of the voting pool. Very fed if you ask me.
do what you want.. just dont expect any miracles...
trump was elected in 2016... the one notable thing i could give him points for is getting rid of TPP...
other than that... ¯_(ツ)_/¯
That's pretty much where I'm at. If voting ever does cost something, either monetarily or security wise, I'll probably stop voting until I can be more confident that the voting system is not rigged.
Right now all it costs is my time, and very little time at that, so I figure "might as well".
a) doesn't every life represent a different result of the same origin?
b) hoping implies wanted outcomes; living implies need to adapt to origin. Try holding your breath while hoping...
a) same objective (process of dying); different results (living)...
b) INSANE (in sanus; within sound) + PERSON (per sonos; by sound)...what if ignoring perceivable sound for suggested words represents "mark my words"?
Voting implies ones willing consent (want or not want) to the suggestions of others, hence tempting one a) into a conflict of reason (want vs not want) and b) into a choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract, hence binding oneself to the will of others.
That being said....everything represents perceivable; nothing represents a suggestion by others to tempt one to ignore perceivable.
a) CHANCE, noun - "effect of an unknown cause"...inception towards death represents the cause; life represents the effect. Those alive cannot perceive "chance"...only ignore perceivable cause for suggested "chances".
b) right vs wrong represents a conflict of reason, shaped by ones consent to the suggested information by another. Nature doesn't communicate right or wrong information; it moves everything, which everyone within perceives as inspiration (moving differences).
What's the difference between your commun-ity and suggested commun-ism by others?
I use to say (back when I talked to real people in real time :) )
'Show me a 'right' and I'll show you ten laws that counter it.'
a) if one consents to suggested rights, then one submits to be at liberty to those suggesting.
b) how those one consent and how do others suggest? By use of "free" will of choice...being implies liberty (liber; free); consenting to the suggested choices by others tempts one to ignore "free" will of choice.
c) nature designates units (Latin unitas; unus, one), hence dividing itself from whole (perceivable) into each partial (perceiving)...others suggest one to count units (plural) which tempts one (singular) to ignore self.
Nature demands adaptation to everything perceivable offered, not counting suggestions by those within nature.
And the income taxes don't even go to build or fix anything, it's all a human farming operation.
income taxes
civil war IRS
And the sheep will look at you like you are a bad person for suggesting we shouldn't pay them. If someone gets away without paying income taxes they look down on that person as immoral.
A single sales tax in each state for each state's needs is one thing, and could probably fund all the country ever needed.
People paying 10's of thousands a year into income tax that goes directly into the bankers pockets in exchange for loaning us paper notes they print at virtually no cost to them is insane, it's literal freaking SLAVERY.
Oh yea, then there's the inflation tax! (Ron Paul)
Every single cent is going to be gone, then they will finish their cull and wipe out all the angry cattle slowly just waking up who worked these lower-middle class jobs all these years to build this NWO hellscape while they sang about liberty thinking they were free.
IT'S CALLED APATHY
Don't forget the ultimate dream of governments everywhere... If you breathe, carbon tax.
Government work is good work if you can get it......cause them some greedy motherf'ers.
There is no inflation tax, but I understand it's effectively one.
I'm actually surprised they still allow us to use cash. Makes it pretty easy to cheat on your tax returns.
So stop allowing it? We need major changes now. We need to make them happen just by doing them. Step 1 is stop paying taxes.
That's the fun part: you're up against hundreds of millions of sheep who don't even know they're being screwed.
If it were up to me, America would look a lot different.
a) consenting to suggested "we" (we the people) and "us" (united states) aka to suggested collectivism (plural) screws one-self (singular).
b) choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law represents the "allowance" for others to "tax" ones ass.
c) as for "them" (plural)....the chosen "ones" (singular).
Implication (if/then) needs to be applied to perceivable (inspiration); not to the suggestions (information by others). Why? Because if one consents to the suggested information by others, then others gain the power of consent to define; redefine and contradict the suggested information at will, hence fucking up ones use of implication.
In short...if consenting to suggested, then no more "ifs" for you. Meanwhile...if adapting to perceivable, then every "if" keeps implying a "then".