It really is amazing how much we allow them to screw us
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (33)
sorted by:
a) consenting to suggested "we" (we the people) and "us" (united states) aka to suggested collectivism (plural) screws one-self (singular).
b) choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law represents the "allowance" for others to "tax" ones ass.
c) as for "them" (plural)....the chosen "ones" (singular).
Implication (if/then) needs to be applied to perceivable (inspiration); not to the suggestions (information by others). Why? Because if one consents to the suggested information by others, then others gain the power of consent to define; redefine and contradict the suggested information at will, hence fucking up ones use of implication.
In short...if consenting to suggested, then no more "ifs" for you. Meanwhile...if adapting to perceivable, then every "if" keeps implying a "then".