It really is amazing how much we allow them to screw us
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (33)
sorted by:
I've said it before and I'll keep saying it: voting costs you nothing, so you might as well do it just in case of the off chance that you are wrong. Just don't put your faith in voting, and do other things to protect yourself and your community.
You’re a slave and will die a slave.
You always pop out of the woodwork whenever I tell people to vote. You seem very insistent that people here don't vote, or participate in the civic process at all. Even when it costs them and you nothing. why?
It’s not a large website.
Yes, you’re reading from the same script you always read from. Identical, copied and pasted responses because your employment depends on it.
Does cost. Kill yourself. You’re not fooling anyone.
a) suggested CIVIC (city) implies surrounding a center. What if that represents the inversion of being center (perceiving) of surrounding (perceivable)?
b) does one really own a civic DUTY (that which a person owes to another) or does each one (life) need to adapt to being processed (inception towards death)?
What if perceivable represents value and each one perceiving represents evaluation? Can there be a higher value than evaluation? What if the whole (process of dying) represents the cost, and each partial (living) the price? Why is it called PAY (to discharge a debt) MENT (mind; memory)?
Does free "will" of choice imply slavery to others? What if will represents ones want to submit to others, while ignoring the need to resist temptations? What if want represents the temptation for need?
Submission can be either with or without consent, of course.
a) MISSION (act of sending, a dispatching; a release) + SUB (under) aka inception towards death (mission) sending; dispatching and releasing life (sub)....
b) being sub (life) within mission (inception towards death) implies resisting as choice, not consenting to choices.
c) try this...if you ever find yourself in submission to another...notice that you can always choose to go deeper or higher, hence representing free will of choice.
Suggested submission represents a distraction; tempting one to ignore being sub within mission.
d) suggested "of course" tempts one (life) to ignore being within course (inception towards death).
e) suggested "without" represents the inversion of living "within" the process of dying aka center (perceiving) within surrounding (perceivable).
f) CON (against) SENT (Latin sentire; to perceive)...hence consenting to suggested; while ignoring perceivable.
"the mark of insanity is repeating the same objective expecting different results"
I'm not expecting different results, I'm hoping. I have no illusions that voting won't do much, if anything. but I repeat and I repeat again: It costs you nothing.
If I could play a free game of roulette for a chance at a million dollars every year, I would play it every time even though I probably would never win. so long as the chances there.
it's the same with voting. There is that glimmer of hope that's all is not lost. so long as you vote that glimmer stays alive. It costs nothing therefore there is nothing to lose and everything to gain.
comparing gambling to voting is not the same thing...
also in roulette you have a 1 in 36 chance of hitting the 00 and everyone loses...
a) gamblers are addicted to loss; voters always lose. Both represent shirking of response-ability (free will of choice) onto the suggested choices of others.
b) sameness (process of dying) generates differences (living)...others tempt one to ignore perceivable differences for suggested sameness, like equality (same) through diversity (difference)...
It. Costs. Nothing.
The only reason I can think of for someone to encourage others to not vote is if they want to keep them out of the voting pool. Very fed if you ask me.
a) doesn't every life represent a different result of the same origin?
b) hoping implies wanted outcomes; living implies need to adapt to origin. Try holding your breath while hoping...
a) same objective (process of dying); different results (living)...
b) INSANE (in sanus; within sound) + PERSON (per sonos; by sound)...what if ignoring perceivable sound for suggested words represents "mark my words"?
Voting implies ones willing consent (want or not want) to the suggestions of others, hence tempting one a) into a conflict of reason (want vs not want) and b) into a choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract, hence binding oneself to the will of others.
That being said....everything represents perceivable; nothing represents a suggestion by others to tempt one to ignore perceivable.
a) CHANCE, noun - "effect of an unknown cause"...inception towards death represents the cause; life represents the effect. Those alive cannot perceive "chance"...only ignore perceivable cause for suggested "chances".
b) right vs wrong represents a conflict of reason, shaped by ones consent to the suggested information by another. Nature doesn't communicate right or wrong information; it moves everything, which everyone within perceives as inspiration (moving differences).
What's the difference between your commun-ity and suggested commun-ism by others?