Name anything they claim. Anything. In any category. It’s not happening, and it can be easily proven that it isn’t.
what about the supposed "overwhelming evidence" for climate change due to human activity?
Never existed.
How can I figure out what is really going on about anything when there is an abundance of info on both "sides”?
We’re in a post-truth society. Gotta do all your research for yourself. Nothing else works anymore. That’s why no one does it. It takes effort. It takes time. It’s “boring.” People just don’t give a shit. It’s just easier to worship the government or see what the government says and worship the “opposite” of it. So that’s what they do.
How can I figure out what is really going on about anything when there is an abundance of info on both "sides"?
Easily. If you can't figure is "climate change" man-made or not, dig deeper - ask yourself, does "climate change" exists at all, and if it exists, is it really as bad and awful, as both sides from your initial question try to convince you.
Hint: check "eocene climate", f.e. That climate alarmists are too dumb to get their hands on paleontology. So, paleontologists data is still untouched, and you could get some clue what real, natural Earth climate should look like. Then, think, why anybody will want our planet blocked half-dead on its way out of previous ice age, instead of becoming literally green from pole to pole.
Here is much larger game going than you could imagine.
PS: Isn't all that strange that core of idea of blocking Earth on its way out of ice age is exactly the same as core of dumbest ever idea of pushing puberty blockers on our children? Looks identical, isn't it? And pushed by exactly same persons.
You can't engineer something you don't understand fully. The best prediction meteorology could give with all their supercomputers and sophisticated models is fucking 3 (three) days. And that's not the "models" climate alarmists use for their chutzpa, but real ones.
You can't engineer an engine if you can't tell what will happen on the third turn of crankshaft. You can't engineer electronic device if you don't know how components works.
"Geoengineering" is bullshit. In the best case that crap could be named as "we poke a leviathan with a stick with absolutely no clue what could happen". Hopefully, stick is too small and leviathan did not notice anything yet.
All benefits from that shit goes not to the industry, because there are no any results, not even speaking about desired results, but to those who push that climate crap on industry effectively destroying it.
The climate is always changing and has been for thousands (if you’re a creationist) or millions (if you’re an evolutionist) of years and will continue to do so with or without human interaction. “Man-made climate change” is a political ploy and indoctrination campaign so the hivemind all speak in fake science terms in the same way they say things like “equity”, “equality”, “disinformation”, “underserved”, etc. without even knowing what those terms mean.
Hard to do actual research on the subject because it is so political that every source is biased. From what I can tell, the climate change issue seems to be an excuse tax us more while reducing our quality of life.
I am not sure climate change is real what is real is polluting lakes and cities with trash. Humanity should not be looked at as parasites but taught to be caretakers of the earth. Water pollution I believe is real including dumping pills and such down the drain. Why not be focused on teaching third world countries not to throw trash on the ground? This goes for ghettos too. I’ve seen teens throw ice cream wrappers on windows, kids throw trash on the ground in front of their parents with no correction. A lady I lived next to everyday would get home and dump her trash from the day in a field. I actually bought a trash can and set it outside my house and at least in front of the few houses by me in the hood trash got put in the trash. Maybe if liberal cities cared about the environment they would facilitate easier ways to dispose of trash like a trash can on every corner? When you tell people they are parasites vs care takers that’s what you get is parasites.
I always point out the Wikipedia article for Global Warming that I was banned from Reddit /Science for showing.
Look it up yourself. The energy equation in the diagram is balanced, meaning there can be no net change in temperature. They never have adjusted the image to show an increase or decrease in heat. They just pretend it says that.
This takes me to another question. How can I figure out what is really going on about anything when there is an abundance of info on both "sides"?
You will never figure out anything from info alone ! THE INFO MUST BE PROCESSED ... BY YOU ... Then you will figure WHATEVER YOU WILL FIGURE .... IT MIGHT BE THE STUPIDEST THING EVER FIGURED ... But it will be what you came up with !
we need data of millions of years to work with to get on a factual level.
Check any paleontologist studies. They have tons of that data.
we can't find a planet to compare earth with
We don't need another planet to do the job.
and dont know how the climate was in the far past.
We perfectly know how the climate was in far past. Everything - temperatures, humidity, air composition, insolation, whatever you want with very good precision.
You could even just take a look at conditions you keep in your house - they are exactly the same as average conditions on most of Earth surface at the time our species was developed/created (depending on your believes) millions years ago. We keep that conditions in our homes as a genetic memory of that distant past. And even most obsessed with climatehoax globalists could not change or erase that memory, because it is in our bodies, not in our minds. Earth climate should have an average temperature of 20°C with 5-6°C gradient between winter and summer, day and night and across all latitudes from pole to pole. As it was in the past.
Name anything they claim. Anything. In any category. It’s not happening, and it can be easily proven that it isn’t.
Never existed.
We’re in a post-truth society. Gotta do all your research for yourself. Nothing else works anymore. That’s why no one does it. It takes effort. It takes time. It’s “boring.” People just don’t give a shit. It’s just easier to worship the government or see what the government says and worship the “opposite” of it. So that’s what they do.
Easily. If you can't figure is "climate change" man-made or not, dig deeper - ask yourself, does "climate change" exists at all, and if it exists, is it really as bad and awful, as both sides from your initial question try to convince you.
Hint: check "eocene climate", f.e. That climate alarmists are too dumb to get their hands on paleontology. So, paleontologists data is still untouched, and you could get some clue what real, natural Earth climate should look like. Then, think, why anybody will want our planet blocked half-dead on its way out of previous ice age, instead of becoming literally green from pole to pole.
Here is much larger game going than you could imagine.
PS: Isn't all that strange that core of idea of blocking Earth on its way out of ice age is exactly the same as core of dumbest ever idea of pushing puberty blockers on our children? Looks identical, isn't it? And pushed by exactly same persons.
You can't engineer something you don't understand fully. The best prediction meteorology could give with all their supercomputers and sophisticated models is fucking 3 (three) days. And that's not the "models" climate alarmists use for their chutzpa, but real ones.
You can't engineer an engine if you can't tell what will happen on the third turn of crankshaft. You can't engineer electronic device if you don't know how components works.
"Geoengineering" is bullshit. In the best case that crap could be named as "we poke a leviathan with a stick with absolutely no clue what could happen". Hopefully, stick is too small and leviathan did not notice anything yet.
All benefits from that shit goes not to the industry, because there are no any results, not even speaking about desired results, but to those who push that climate crap on industry effectively destroying it.
The climate is always changing and has been for thousands (if you’re a creationist) or millions (if you’re an evolutionist) of years and will continue to do so with or without human interaction. “Man-made climate change” is a political ploy and indoctrination campaign so the hivemind all speak in fake science terms in the same way they say things like “equity”, “equality”, “disinformation”, “underserved”, etc. without even knowing what those terms mean.
The easiest way is to review our captured data.
First you review the unmodified data set and then you compare that to the modified data set.
Mission accomplished.
We see clearly that without the modifications we have been living in a fairly consistent normal range where we have highs and lows.
Hard to do actual research on the subject because it is so political that every source is biased. From what I can tell, the climate change issue seems to be an excuse tax us more while reducing our quality of life.
I am not sure climate change is real what is real is polluting lakes and cities with trash. Humanity should not be looked at as parasites but taught to be caretakers of the earth. Water pollution I believe is real including dumping pills and such down the drain. Why not be focused on teaching third world countries not to throw trash on the ground? This goes for ghettos too. I’ve seen teens throw ice cream wrappers on windows, kids throw trash on the ground in front of their parents with no correction. A lady I lived next to everyday would get home and dump her trash from the day in a field. I actually bought a trash can and set it outside my house and at least in front of the few houses by me in the hood trash got put in the trash. Maybe if liberal cities cared about the environment they would facilitate easier ways to dispose of trash like a trash can on every corner? When you tell people they are parasites vs care takers that’s what you get is parasites.
I always point out the Wikipedia article for Global Warming that I was banned from Reddit /Science for showing.
Look it up yourself. The energy equation in the diagram is balanced, meaning there can be no net change in temperature. They never have adjusted the image to show an increase or decrease in heat. They just pretend it says that.
https://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenhouse_gas#/media/File%3AGreenhouse_Effect.svg
235 MW in, 235 MW out. No heat change.
You will never figure out anything from info alone ! THE INFO MUST BE PROCESSED ... BY YOU ... Then you will figure WHATEVER YOU WILL FIGURE .... IT MIGHT BE THE STUPIDEST THING EVER FIGURED ... But it will be what you came up with !
Check any paleontologist studies. They have tons of that data.
We don't need another planet to do the job.
We perfectly know how the climate was in far past. Everything - temperatures, humidity, air composition, insolation, whatever you want with very good precision.
You could even just take a look at conditions you keep in your house - they are exactly the same as average conditions on most of Earth surface at the time our species was developed/created (depending on your believes) millions years ago. We keep that conditions in our homes as a genetic memory of that distant past. And even most obsessed with climatehoax globalists could not change or erase that memory, because it is in our bodies, not in our minds. Earth climate should have an average temperature of 20°C with 5-6°C gradient between winter and summer, day and night and across all latitudes from pole to pole. As it was in the past.