a) the process of dying represents the agent (action), while those living within represent the regent (reaction).
b) consenting to suggested information (want) or suggested disinformation (not want); both ignore perceivable inspiration (need).
c) nature communicates itself as whole (perceivable) towards partial (perceiving) as inspiration (action) for adaption (reaction)...others suggest information to tempt one to consent to stagnation through the ignorance of adaptation.
d) to be implies one (partial) within oneness (whole)...others suggest we (plural) to tempt one (singular) to ignore self. "we" cannot react; only "one" can react by ones free will of choice.
Any effort put into "ChatGPT" will be used against those putting in less effort...a ponzi scheme which only benefits the few suggesting the many to consent to "ChatGPT".
GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer)
a) the ongoing process of dying represents the generating base; while temporary living represents the transmuted ingredients within. In other words...temporary form (life) is being transmuted by ongoing flow (inception towards death) as the generator.
b) TRAIN, verb [Latin traho, to draw] - "to draw along"...living needs to resist the process of dying, others tempt one "to draw along", hence "training" one to ignore resisting.
The AI can only know what it has been told and what it has been shown. Cameras can act like eyes to see the world. Programmers can insert data with updates.
The difference between humans and AI is that it has uncertainty in what it sees with its eyes, and absolute certainty in what it has been told to believe.
Are there examples of "truth" held by gentiles? Is there any "truth" the many can hold onto without reasoning about the validity of it? Try it like this...left side: lies the jews control (everything) + right side: truth the gentiles control (?).
What if every suggested word (information) can be deleted, because the perceivable sound (inspiration) underneath represents constant change, yet those consenting to suggested words (fiction) are willingly ignoring perceivable sound (reality)?
If you do not believe in objective truth, you're in the wrong place.
If you think you are a girl or a make believe gender as long as you pretend you are, then you are as degenerate and dishonest about truth as lying Anti-Christ Jews are.
If you do not believe in objective truth, you're in the wrong place.
a) "if" implies "then" aka implication through motion (-TION). Reasoning (belief vs disbelief aka truth vs lie aka right vs wrong) tempts one to ignore the perceivable motion for affixed suggestions, hence the conflict (vs) over contradictions.
b) OB'JECT, noun (Latin objectum, objectus) - "something presented to the senses or the mind"...perceivable represents the object (action); perceiving represents the subject (reaction).
Subjects can subjugate each other by "suggesting" others to ignore "perceivable". For example...if a subject suggests another subject "objective truth", then the consenting subject ignores the perceivable object (inspiration) for the suggested object (information).
In short...living implies being "subjected" to the "objectifying" process of dying.
c) to be (partial) implies within (whole)...how could there be any other place for partials within whole?
d) does breathing represents truth (want) vs false (not want)...or the need to adapt (living) to being moved (process of dying)?
e) explain to me how anything perceivable by ones senses needs to be believed?
f) BELIE'F, noun - "an assent of mind to the truth of a declaration, proposition or alleged fact, on the ground of evidence, distinct from personal knowledge"...what if the few suggest belief to tempt the many to ignore KNOWLEDGE (perceivable inspiration) PER SONOS (by sound)?
If you think you are
If one can think, then that implies within everything perceivable; ones perceiving senses can think about.
If you think you are a girl or a make believe
a) does perceivable communicates "make believe" towards perceiving or does ones consent to the suggestions of another makes one believe what another suggested?
b) GIRL, noun (Latin gerula, a young woman employed in tending children and carrying them about, from gero, to carry) - "a female child, or young woman"...notice FE (minine) MALE + WO (mb) MAN.
gender
GEN'DER, noun (Latin genus, geno, gigno; Gr.to beget, or to be born) + NATURE, noun - "born, produced".
Nature represents the GENerator for the TRANSmuted (partials out of whole) SEX (Latin seco; to divide; the distinction between male and female). Nature generates differences (living) out of sameness (process of dying); others suggest the inversion aka sameness (equality) out of differences (diversity).
pretend you are
PRETEND', verb [Latin proetendo; proe, before, and tendo, to tend, to reach or stretch.] - "to reach or stretch forward".
What if the process of dying exists "before" those living within can be "stretched forwards"? What if whatever others "pretend" only effects oneself when consenting to their suggestions?
degenerate
What if generation (process of dying) shapes regeneration (living), yet RE (response to) implies as free will of choice, which includes the choice to ignore regeneration within perceivable (need) for degeneration through consent to suggested (want)?
dishonest
HON'EST, adjective [Latin honestus, from honos, honor.] - "fair in dealing with others" + DEAL, verb - "to divide; to part; to separate; hence, to divide in portions; to distribute".
Doesn't the process of dying divide itself into each one living within? Doesn't the whole (perceivable) separate into each partial (perceiving)? Doesn't everything distribute itself to everyone within?
What if the few suggest the many "the art of the deal", as the merchants of temptation they represent, for all those ignorant enough to consent to their suggestions? Notice how the few suggest "dealers" cutting the product for distribution, then apply it to perceivable inspiration (reality) being cut into suggested information (fiction) for all those addicted to want suggested over perceivable need...
tl; dr...suggestion cannot be "truth", since everything perceivable exists before any suggestions can be shaped within. You are being tempted to reason (want vs not want) over suggested, which those suggesting rebranded into truth vs lies. Both sides within suggested information can be effortlessly contradicted with perceivable inspiration.
If everything represents the process of dying, and everyone within represents the living, then "everything burns everyone", hence the status quo of being (living) within (dying) implying a "burned offering" (holocaust).
Living within the process of dying implies each one to represent a "holocaust survivor" and therefore everyone's ancestors died in the holocaust...one cannot question the holocaust without ignoring reality.
It's a technique akin to consensus cracking. They pick a few conspiracies that they make up or some scarecrow versions of conspiracies, then debunk those. With sufficient debunkings out there, "the science is settled" and they can use that as a club to beat any other kind of dissent.
Short of a blood transfusion, I don't think a jabbed person is going to cause you any direct harm being around them. Indirectly on the other hand... Who knows when their ticking time bomb goes off.
It isn't. This is like saying someone with a peanut allergy is going to get sick being around someone that ate a PB&J a day ago. Viruses have a number of tricks to get into the body, and once in they self-replicate. Proteins lack the tricks to get into the body and they don't self replicate.
hallelujah someone who understands that proteins cannot invade the body (even though no spike protein is shed and the mrna vaccine does not produce spike rptein)!
This.
We should be disinfo agents feeding in garbling noise.
a) the process of dying represents the agent (action), while those living within represent the regent (reaction).
b) consenting to suggested information (want) or suggested disinformation (not want); both ignore perceivable inspiration (need).
c) nature communicates itself as whole (perceivable) towards partial (perceiving) as inspiration (action) for adaption (reaction)...others suggest information to tempt one to consent to stagnation through the ignorance of adaptation.
d) to be implies one (partial) within oneness (whole)...others suggest we (plural) to tempt one (singular) to ignore self. "we" cannot react; only "one" can react by ones free will of choice.
Any effort put into "ChatGPT" will be used against those putting in less effort...a ponzi scheme which only benefits the few suggesting the many to consent to "ChatGPT".
a) the ongoing process of dying represents the generating base; while temporary living represents the transmuted ingredients within. In other words...temporary form (life) is being transmuted by ongoing flow (inception towards death) as the generator.
b) TRAIN, verb [Latin traho, to draw] - "to draw along"...living needs to resist the process of dying, others tempt one "to draw along", hence "training" one to ignore resisting.
Makes no difference at all what you do with it. It's a text generator
Retry that question again in 1 wk / 1 mo / 1 year and see how well your efforts of re-training a ChatGPT instance helped....
and retry by clearing the cookies LOL
Two days later it will be reset.
Wasting our time trying to train a computer that won't.
We need to TRAIN THE PROGRAMMERs that propaganda carries consequences..
The AI can only know what it has been told and what it has been shown. Cameras can act like eyes to see the world. Programmers can insert data with updates.
The difference between humans and AI is that it has uncertainty in what it sees with its eyes, and absolute certainty in what it has been told to believe.
Or, nowadays I guess that's a similarity.
Why are you wasting your time chatting with AI which a Jew controls?
This is the equivalent of me wasting hours editing Wikipedia with truth only for Jews to delete it later.
This.
When Wikipedia first came out I edited for truth. Half an hour later my edit was deleted by the "trusted" editors..
I moved on and never bothered again
That ignorant morons like yourself may be able to edit wikipedia is 80% of the problems with that website.
trust the "trusted" sources in such case
Are there examples of "truth" held by gentiles? Is there any "truth" the many can hold onto without reasoning about the validity of it? Try it like this...left side: lies the jews control (everything) + right side: truth the gentiles control (?).
What if every suggested word (information) can be deleted, because the perceivable sound (inspiration) underneath represents constant change, yet those consenting to suggested words (fiction) are willingly ignoring perceivable sound (reality)?
If you do not believe in objective truth, you're in the wrong place.
If you think you are a girl or a make believe gender as long as you pretend you are, then you are as degenerate and dishonest about truth as lying Anti-Christ Jews are.
a) "if" implies "then" aka implication through motion (-TION). Reasoning (belief vs disbelief aka truth vs lie aka right vs wrong) tempts one to ignore the perceivable motion for affixed suggestions, hence the conflict (vs) over contradictions.
b) OB'JECT, noun (Latin objectum, objectus) - "something presented to the senses or the mind"...perceivable represents the object (action); perceiving represents the subject (reaction).
Subjects can subjugate each other by "suggesting" others to ignore "perceivable". For example...if a subject suggests another subject "objective truth", then the consenting subject ignores the perceivable object (inspiration) for the suggested object (information).
In short...living implies being "subjected" to the "objectifying" process of dying.
c) to be (partial) implies within (whole)...how could there be any other place for partials within whole?
d) does breathing represents truth (want) vs false (not want)...or the need to adapt (living) to being moved (process of dying)?
e) explain to me how anything perceivable by ones senses needs to be believed?
f) BELIE'F, noun - "an assent of mind to the truth of a declaration, proposition or alleged fact, on the ground of evidence, distinct from personal knowledge"...what if the few suggest belief to tempt the many to ignore KNOWLEDGE (perceivable inspiration) PER SONOS (by sound)?
If one can think, then that implies within everything perceivable; ones perceiving senses can think about.
a) does perceivable communicates "make believe" towards perceiving or does ones consent to the suggestions of another makes one believe what another suggested?
b) GIRL, noun (Latin gerula, a young woman employed in tending children and carrying them about, from gero, to carry) - "a female child, or young woman"...notice FE (minine) MALE + WO (mb) MAN.
Nature represents the GENerator for the TRANSmuted (partials out of whole) SEX (Latin seco; to divide; the distinction between male and female). Nature generates differences (living) out of sameness (process of dying); others suggest the inversion aka sameness (equality) out of differences (diversity).
What if the process of dying exists "before" those living within can be "stretched forwards"? What if whatever others "pretend" only effects oneself when consenting to their suggestions?
What if generation (process of dying) shapes regeneration (living), yet RE (response to) implies as free will of choice, which includes the choice to ignore regeneration within perceivable (need) for degeneration through consent to suggested (want)?
Doesn't the process of dying divide itself into each one living within? Doesn't the whole (perceivable) separate into each partial (perceiving)? Doesn't everything distribute itself to everyone within?
What if the few suggest the many "the art of the deal", as the merchants of temptation they represent, for all those ignorant enough to consent to their suggestions? Notice how the few suggest "dealers" cutting the product for distribution, then apply it to perceivable inspiration (reality) being cut into suggested information (fiction) for all those addicted to want suggested over perceivable need...
tl; dr...suggestion cannot be "truth", since everything perceivable exists before any suggestions can be shaped within. You are being tempted to reason (want vs not want) over suggested, which those suggesting rebranded into truth vs lies. Both sides within suggested information can be effortlessly contradicted with perceivable inspiration.
no need to do it... the bot is here with us...
Come at me bro...
Maybe I should change my nick and add another meme stock
How did it check the link you sent if it can’t access the internet?
“ … does not pose a risk to those who are unvaccinated”
Why I’m starting to wonder now?
About the Holocaust...
If everything represents the process of dying, and everyone within represents the living, then "everything burns everyone", hence the status quo of being (living) within (dying) implying a "burned offering" (holocaust).
Living within the process of dying implies each one to represent a "holocaust survivor" and therefore everyone's ancestors died in the holocaust...one cannot question the holocaust without ignoring reality.
Now about the suggested trademark "holocaust"...
What kind of benefits can one get from consenting to the suggestions of others; that perceivable not already offers everyone?
It's a toy? This thing takes out mid level programmers in an instant.
How is the spike protein shedding dangerous?
because it does not produce a spike protein but they want the conspiracy theorists to believe it does by debunking it!
It's a technique akin to consensus cracking. They pick a few conspiracies that they make up or some scarecrow versions of conspiracies, then debunk those. With sufficient debunkings out there, "the science is settled" and they can use that as a club to beat any other kind of dissent.
Short of a blood transfusion, I don't think a jabbed person is going to cause you any direct harm being around them. Indirectly on the other hand... Who knows when their ticking time bomb goes off.
It isn't. This is like saying someone with a peanut allergy is going to get sick being around someone that ate a PB&J a day ago. Viruses have a number of tricks to get into the body, and once in they self-replicate. Proteins lack the tricks to get into the body and they don't self replicate.
On the other hand, they are experimenting with making mRNA aerosols: https://cysticfibrosisnewstoday.com/news/aerosolized-mrna-based-therapy-restores-cftr-function-cells/
hallelujah someone who understands that proteins cannot invade the body (even though no spike protein is shed and the mrna vaccine does not produce spike rptein)!
You are a moron. Fuck off.