Long ago a tribe of criminals began subverting systems. Over the years the criminals have been discovered a number of times by society and were outcast. But never abolished.
More of the same. Using economic slavery and other criminal tactics around currency operations has allowed financial systems to completely manipulate all aspects of human development.
So the current system is driven by economic wealth. And this is basically where criminals live.
As I understand it they invented their own entity to worship, called Jabulon, but that knowledge was only available to high degrees. The lower degrees functioned under the illusion that the higher power was the same god as Christians, and treated Hyram Abiff as a kind of saint/messiah type person. This was the case as recently as the 80's/90's in UK, the ancestral home of Freemasonry.
There was a recent book alleging major changes among masonic orders in recent decades, especially in Europe. The book was written in Italian and has not been fully translated, but you can find abridged notes in English online. No publisher wishes to publish in English yet apparently. The author claims to be a former mason and details the fracturing of Masonic orders in recent decades into new, somewhat undocumented orders (at least in public) - one major change is that all the new orders allow women. Nothing has been confirmed outside of the one book though. The author is Gioele Magaldi and the book is "Massoni".
I read a book. Search Jabulon and you'll find some stuff about it. It was apparently a secret until a young British journalist called Stephan / Steven Knight discovered it (while researching about Jack The Ripper, a Freemasonic Hoax) and then wrote a book about Freemasonry. He managed to land interviews with some top masons and mentioned the name - and they all froze in shock in the same way. A little while later Knight died young from an aggressive form of brain cancer.
“Destroy what exists because it exists and because it is not yours” is pretty clear cut. Everything happening makes sense if you look at it through Frankist Sabbatean eyes.
Are you the one from voat? If so, hello again. You could be the one who told me that the last name of the Bush family is really Scherff.
Would Satan be one of the Anunnaki? There was a post on 4chan yesterday about a book put together by the Germans in WW2. They went into the German masonic lodges and found out what they were doing in there. There were a lot of references to Jehovah being the god of the Jews. I am certain that Jesus said that Jehovah/YHWH is the devil/satan. I wonder which one of the Anunnaki this would be? I think that at least one of them did not leave.
It could also be that all the Anunnaki left and then Nephilim at the top of the pyramid filled the power vacuum and kept the slave system going. The one at the top would be the Pindar of the Draco.
I really don’t know enough about this to say either way. I think that perhaps the categorization and hierarchy of evil is less important than knowing what is evil and being able to combat it.
I agree with you on that, but I think that we will eventually have to slay the dragon or future generations will have to go through the same thing as we are.
If you want to understand the world and elites better you have to stop striving for objective knowledge about them. You'll never know anything for sure anyway.
The only universality between elites is that they wish to stay rich and powerful.
There is no objective reality. This is the intersection between science and religion. The world is how we perceive/project it to be; how we expect it to be.
Think in terms of functional metaphors. If say fire burns you because of demons, or explain heat and tissue, etc, it doesn't really matter in the context of not burning yourself. The truth is only a semantic difference.
Read:
ATS Hidden Hand post.
Neville Goddard
Sermon on the Mountain
Double-slit experient
Experimental test of local observer-independence
A cabal of primarily jewish criminals. Look at who is in the CFR, WEF, and Bilderberg. As Mayer Rothschild put it, "Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws.”
Satan. Here's the real problem, though: part of the population does not believe he exists, so will always attribute his program to the wrong causes.
The other part of the population neglects to study Satan as if he exists. That is, rather than searching for and examining available evidence as in conventional scholarship and science, they basically just pick and choose mythology and make it up as they go along. The results they achieve only marginally surpass the first group.
I doubt it is humans. We are in some kind of sealed biome, which makes me think it is similar to a petri dish. Perhaps we are just an experiment. Maybe we are an energy source. I wouldn't rule out a simulation either.
Once you discover the very simple but overlooked fact that stars are not lightyears away, and probably aren't stars at all, you have to re-wire the way you think about everything. I don't care if the planet is flat, square, or a sphere; if stars are not far away then it infers we are in a much smaller system than we have been led to believe. At the same time, we are being lied to about the nature of reality by all of our educational institutions from an early age. That means somebody knows that we are in a sealed system and is hiding it for some reason. Once you understand this, you have to start looking at everything they are doing under a new light. What is CERN? Why are so many entities obsessed with building bigger and better particle accellerators? Why are we launching thousands of satellites into the skies? Who are the people that kept disarming the nuclear missiles? Not aliens. Probably the custodians.
If the stars aren't stars, then it changes everything. This is the biggest hole in their deceiption. Anyone can see the problem of how impossible it would be to see stars, once it is pointed out to them. The closest star is over 90 trillion kilometers away. A microscopic piece of dust would block it from our view. We have the supposed Oort cloud, cosmic dust from comets, rogute planets, asteroids, and gases that are supposedly ubiquitous throughout space, but somehow our view of the stars never changes. When a star does change in brightness, it is a big deal and gets lots of news coverage. We claim to see stars that are BILLIONS of light years away. Even an atom would block such a distant object from view, and yet somehow everything remains visible through all of the gases and particles in our atmosphere.
a) the process of dying runs the living, hence each life from inception towards death without a hitch.
b) each thing within represents a partial who; everything around represents the whole where; what and why.
planet
The suggested planet is run by those suggesting it to those consenting to it. The perceivable PLANE, noun - "level surface" aka the plane of existence represents free will of choice (surface) within the dominance of balance (level) aka free-dom.
I doubt it's one person.
There can be only one, hence all for one or one for all, because all represents one in energy. The hesitation to react (doubt) implies ONE's free will of choice...others cannot hesitate for oneself, it's oneself that chooses to follow the hesitant reactions of others.
all the division we're seeing today...divide and conquer" is being applied everywhere
Consenting to anything suggested represents want or not wanting it. Whatever side one chooses will put one against the other. The resulting conflict (want vs not want) is called reasoning.
The few not only conquer consent through suggestion and divided the many into reasoning against each other, they also gain the power to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) both sides of every conflict of reason.
agents on both "sides"
a) both sides within reason are consenting to the same suggestion, hence fueling the suggested, while fighting each other over it.
b) the few suggest actors under directors to tempt the many to ignore being reaction (life) within direction (inception towards death). One cannot act...only react within an enacting system aka as reactors within a generator.
the goal...
...represents suggested progressivism for the many chase after, while they willingly ignore that living isn't about reaching outcome (death), but about adaptation to origin for the sustenance of life, hence each one representing temporary resistance (living) within ongoing temptation (dying).
Life isn't about goal; it represents the opportunity to grow (living) within loss (process of dying) and the response-ability (choice) to resist (living) temptation (dying).
Outcomes represent suggested wants, Origin represents perceivable need. One doesn't drink to be full (outcome), one drinks to quench thirst (origin).
the journey of living is what matters...is that what you're trying to say?
a) JOURNEY, noun [Latin diurnus, dies.]...your consent to suggested SAY, verb - "to utter in words" gives others the power to define; redefine and contradict the words used, hence here asking if "dying of living is what matters" without comprehending to do so.
b) TRY, verb - "to exert strength" + EXERT', verb - "to thrust forth; to emit; to push out; to bring out; to cause to come forth; to produce" implies the cause (whole) before the effect (partial). Therefore...within the whole try, each partial is trialed.
c) I adapt to perceivable inspiration; while resisting suggested information, which in return grows my comprehension about both the aforementioned fuckery through suggestion and the perceivable origin. The former may or may not inspire other ones to chose perceivable (need) over suggested (want) by oneself; while the latter represents the communication between whole and partial aka me as the recipient responding to directly to everything offered to me instead of using others as a substitute source.
not the end
Your consent to suggested "not" (nothing; nothingness) tempts you to ignore perceivable everything. Beginning (inception) implies end (death), hence momentum (life) implying motion (inception towards death). Each one represents the center (choice) of momentum (balance), while temporary (life) within ongoing (inception towards death) motion.
What does it mean to resist then?
a) imagine a treadmill representing ongoing motion, then put yourself onto it as the temporary within the ongoing. Next, notice that there's now a choice within a balance (momentum of motion), hence your choice to either resist the ongoing (need) or fall for the temptation to ignore to resist (want).
b) as for meaning...if perceivable represents the signifying, then suggestion represents the opposite of signal...denial; refusal; ignorance...which represents ones reacting choice (perceiving) within signifying (perceivable).
Asking for meaning implies asking for suggestions by others, hence denying; refusing, ignoring the predefined signal for each one within...perceivable inspiration towards perceiving adaptation.
c) from the energy perspective...motion implies velocity (process of dying) causing momentum (balance), which allows resistance (living choice) within. Discerning to be resistance within the momentum of velocity allows one to reverse engineer the whole as the partial, hence growing comprehension (compression) as the perceiving (expression) within the perceivable (impressing).
d) resistance in short...ones need to resist want.
If I no longer have a goal to reach(which would mark that goal's "death"), then what do I do?
The goal is being suggested by others and represents what you want. Being directed within motion represents the need for your adaptation to origin. Even if you choose to ignore being directed by the natural order; for following the suggested orders by others...you would still adapt as the living within the process of dying (breathing; drinking; eating; sheltering etc.).
Doing this makes all the suggested goals either fleeting or always out of reach, while you spend your entire life to hold onto what can't be hold onto or to reach what won't fulfill you anyway. Instead of growing within the perceivable, you're tempted to get addicted to suggested loss...like every gambler. "winning" represents the sales-pitch to tempt one to gamble growth within loss.
What to do? Growing self discernment about being done by, hence representing the opportunity to "redo" aka to RE (response to) DO (being done by). Others suggest one what to "do" as to tempt one to ignore being the "re" (living) within the "do" (process of dying).
simply live?
SIM'PLE, adjective [Latin simplex; sine, without and plex, plica, doubling, fold] - "single; consisting of one thing; uncompounded"...have you tried that? Asking others for suggested meaning implies ones choice to seek the compound among others, instead of growing self as the partial within the whole.
Resisting suggested compounding (e pluribus unum aka out of many, one) implies the struggle to sustain apartheid. The seed (choice) struggles to stay apart as to utilize the soil (balance) to grow within. If you compound the seeds, then you just tempt birds with a free meal, while spreading the seeds implies adaptation from the birds, who then have to work the fields, which in return implies your adaptation to work the fields and so on...working together through staying apart. Ones simple struggle has complex consequences to struggle within...
Resist the suggested "nothing" for the perceivable everything and you can discern that animal and human represent growth, that vegetable and human represent animation, and that animal and vegetable represent form within flow.
It's the labels others are suggesting, which when consented to, tempt one to ignore the perceivable, labeless behavior of form within flow aka to perceive moving differences as perceivable inspiration for adaptation.
Isn't life movement and movement imply a direction and therefore a destination?
a) "movement" implies MOVE (being moved by) MENT (mind/memory reacting to moving input).
b) life represents RE (response to) MOVE (being moved by), hence being removed (process of dying) while being alive within aka growth within loss.
c) discerning to be within (life) direction (inception towards death), allows further growth of comprehension about being reaction within direction, which implies reactors within a generator. Now keep using implication...if everything is generating; how can one thing within react to it? If the generator (loss) generates reactors (growth) to sustain itself, then being a reactor (growth) within a generator (loss) implies the temporary opportunity to...
d) if it's predetermined (destiny), then why ignore "pre" as the generator for everything perceivable...for suggested "aft" aka whatever others suggest comes after what now is?
Those who consent to suggested outcomes, while ignoring perceivable origin, give others the power to play "Final Destination" with them. https://pic8.co/sh/HdHYMa.jpg
Isn't a life without movement or goal death though?
"Fell Somethin' movin' all over me...Whatever it is no man can see"
"From the crown of ma' head to the soul of ma' feet...Spirit is movin', spirit is movin', spirit is movin' all-over me!"
"I Can't Stop Movin', Can't Can't Stop Movin', Can't Stop Movin', I Can't Keep Still"
Those (partial) within motion (whole) cannot STOP, noun - "cessation of progressive motion"...others can suggest progressivism to tempt one to view others as a stop-sign to ones progress. Ever been annoyed by that inner want to move on while standing at a stop-sign?
Criminals.
Long ago a tribe of criminals began subverting systems. Over the years the criminals have been discovered a number of times by society and were outcast. But never abolished.
More of the same. Using economic slavery and other criminal tactics around currency operations has allowed financial systems to completely manipulate all aspects of human development.
So the current system is driven by economic wealth. And this is basically where criminals live.
yes, and they are closeted devil worshippers
As I understand it they invented their own entity to worship, called Jabulon, but that knowledge was only available to high degrees. The lower degrees functioned under the illusion that the higher power was the same god as Christians, and treated Hyram Abiff as a kind of saint/messiah type person. This was the case as recently as the 80's/90's in UK, the ancestral home of Freemasonry.
There was a recent book alleging major changes among masonic orders in recent decades, especially in Europe. The book was written in Italian and has not been fully translated, but you can find abridged notes in English online. No publisher wishes to publish in English yet apparently. The author claims to be a former mason and details the fracturing of Masonic orders in recent decades into new, somewhat undocumented orders (at least in public) - one major change is that all the new orders allow women. Nothing has been confirmed outside of the one book though. The author is Gioele Magaldi and the book is "Massoni".
the vessels are ready for the field is well plowed
denmark is going to rise
i hate masons, but i can see them
12
I read a book. Search Jabulon and you'll find some stuff about it. It was apparently a secret until a young British journalist called Stephan / Steven Knight discovered it (while researching about Jack The Ripper, a Freemasonic Hoax) and then wrote a book about Freemasonry. He managed to land interviews with some top masons and mentioned the name - and they all froze in shock in the same way. A little while later Knight died young from an aggressive form of brain cancer.
Does Satan count as one person?
“Destroy what exists because it exists and because it is not yours” is pretty clear cut. Everything happening makes sense if you look at it through Frankist Sabbatean eyes.
Are you the one from voat? If so, hello again. You could be the one who told me that the last name of the Bush family is really Scherff.
Would Satan be one of the Anunnaki? There was a post on 4chan yesterday about a book put together by the Germans in WW2. They went into the German masonic lodges and found out what they were doing in there. There were a lot of references to Jehovah being the god of the Jews. I am certain that Jesus said that Jehovah/YHWH is the devil/satan. I wonder which one of the Anunnaki this would be? I think that at least one of them did not leave.
https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/410254758
https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/410104070#p410104070
It could also be that all the Anunnaki left and then Nephilim at the top of the pyramid filled the power vacuum and kept the slave system going. The one at the top would be the Pindar of the Draco.
Thoughts?
I really don’t know enough about this to say either way. I think that perhaps the categorization and hierarchy of evil is less important than knowing what is evil and being able to combat it.
I agree with you on that, but I think that we will eventually have to slay the dragon or future generations will have to go through the same thing as we are.
If you want to understand the world and elites better you have to stop striving for objective knowledge about them. You'll never know anything for sure anyway.
The only universality between elites is that they wish to stay rich and powerful.
There is no objective reality. This is the intersection between science and religion. The world is how we perceive/project it to be; how we expect it to be.
Think in terms of functional metaphors. If say fire burns you because of demons, or explain heat and tissue, etc, it doesn't really matter in the context of not burning yourself. The truth is only a semantic difference.
Read: ATS Hidden Hand post. Neville Goddard Sermon on the Mountain Double-slit experient Experimental test of local observer-independence
Hmmm could it be... SAAAAAAATAAAAAAAAN?!?!?!?!?
A cabal of primarily jewish criminals. Look at who is in the CFR, WEF, and Bilderberg. As Mayer Rothschild put it, "Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws.”
chaos rules, basically.
nah, chaos is surprisingly nonsensical
Satan. Here's the real problem, though: part of the population does not believe he exists, so will always attribute his program to the wrong causes.
The other part of the population neglects to study Satan as if he exists. That is, rather than searching for and examining available evidence as in conventional scholarship and science, they basically just pick and choose mythology and make it up as they go along. The results they achieve only marginally surpass the first group.
Here's an idea: no one runs the world. It's a giant free for all for anyone with power to do what they please.
blackrock aint shit.
vanguard is the king.
all their clients are "non profit orgs."
non profit orgs do not have to list their members. its dark money w/ peeps in the shadows.
some orgs... bill & melinda foundation, clinton foundation, soros foundation.
I assume it's the people whose money is in BlackRock, Vanguard, and StateStreet.
In other words, we don't know.
Not idiots who think it's a planet. That's obvious
I doubt it is humans. We are in some kind of sealed biome, which makes me think it is similar to a petri dish. Perhaps we are just an experiment. Maybe we are an energy source. I wouldn't rule out a simulation either.
Once you discover the very simple but overlooked fact that stars are not lightyears away, and probably aren't stars at all, you have to re-wire the way you think about everything. I don't care if the planet is flat, square, or a sphere; if stars are not far away then it infers we are in a much smaller system than we have been led to believe. At the same time, we are being lied to about the nature of reality by all of our educational institutions from an early age. That means somebody knows that we are in a sealed system and is hiding it for some reason. Once you understand this, you have to start looking at everything they are doing under a new light. What is CERN? Why are so many entities obsessed with building bigger and better particle accellerators? Why are we launching thousands of satellites into the skies? Who are the people that kept disarming the nuclear missiles? Not aliens. Probably the custodians.
If the stars aren't stars, then it changes everything. This is the biggest hole in their deceiption. Anyone can see the problem of how impossible it would be to see stars, once it is pointed out to them. The closest star is over 90 trillion kilometers away. A microscopic piece of dust would block it from our view. We have the supposed Oort cloud, cosmic dust from comets, rogute planets, asteroids, and gases that are supposedly ubiquitous throughout space, but somehow our view of the stars never changes. When a star does change in brightness, it is a big deal and gets lots of news coverage. We claim to see stars that are BILLIONS of light years away. Even an atom would block such a distant object from view, and yet somehow everything remains visible through all of the gases and particles in our atmosphere.
Start with the stars, and then dig deeper.
jews. spiritual demons don't exist. physical ones do
a) the process of dying runs the living, hence each life from inception towards death without a hitch.
b) each thing within represents a partial who; everything around represents the whole where; what and why.
The suggested planet is run by those suggesting it to those consenting to it. The perceivable PLANE, noun - "level surface" aka the plane of existence represents free will of choice (surface) within the dominance of balance (level) aka free-dom.
There can be only one, hence all for one or one for all, because all represents one in energy. The hesitation to react (doubt) implies ONE's free will of choice...others cannot hesitate for oneself, it's oneself that chooses to follow the hesitant reactions of others.
Consenting to anything suggested represents want or not wanting it. Whatever side one chooses will put one against the other. The resulting conflict (want vs not want) is called reasoning.
The few not only conquer consent through suggestion and divided the many into reasoning against each other, they also gain the power to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) both sides of every conflict of reason.
a) both sides within reason are consenting to the same suggestion, hence fueling the suggested, while fighting each other over it.
b) the few suggest actors under directors to tempt the many to ignore being reaction (life) within direction (inception towards death). One cannot act...only react within an enacting system aka as reactors within a generator.
...represents suggested progressivism for the many chase after, while they willingly ignore that living isn't about reaching outcome (death), but about adaptation to origin for the sustenance of life, hence each one representing temporary resistance (living) within ongoing temptation (dying).
Life isn't about goal; it represents the opportunity to grow (living) within loss (process of dying) and the response-ability (choice) to resist (living) temptation (dying).
Outcomes represent suggested wants, Origin represents perceivable need. One doesn't drink to be full (outcome), one drinks to quench thirst (origin).
don't feed the troll
a) JOURNEY, noun [Latin diurnus, dies.]...your consent to suggested SAY, verb - "to utter in words" gives others the power to define; redefine and contradict the words used, hence here asking if "dying of living is what matters" without comprehending to do so.
b) TRY, verb - "to exert strength" + EXERT', verb - "to thrust forth; to emit; to push out; to bring out; to cause to come forth; to produce" implies the cause (whole) before the effect (partial). Therefore...within the whole try, each partial is trialed.
c) I adapt to perceivable inspiration; while resisting suggested information, which in return grows my comprehension about both the aforementioned fuckery through suggestion and the perceivable origin. The former may or may not inspire other ones to chose perceivable (need) over suggested (want) by oneself; while the latter represents the communication between whole and partial aka me as the recipient responding to directly to everything offered to me instead of using others as a substitute source.
Your consent to suggested "not" (nothing; nothingness) tempts you to ignore perceivable everything. Beginning (inception) implies end (death), hence momentum (life) implying motion (inception towards death). Each one represents the center (choice) of momentum (balance), while temporary (life) within ongoing (inception towards death) motion.
a) imagine a treadmill representing ongoing motion, then put yourself onto it as the temporary within the ongoing. Next, notice that there's now a choice within a balance (momentum of motion), hence your choice to either resist the ongoing (need) or fall for the temptation to ignore to resist (want).
b) as for meaning...if perceivable represents the signifying, then suggestion represents the opposite of signal...denial; refusal; ignorance...which represents ones reacting choice (perceiving) within signifying (perceivable).
Asking for meaning implies asking for suggestions by others, hence denying; refusing, ignoring the predefined signal for each one within...perceivable inspiration towards perceiving adaptation.
c) from the energy perspective...motion implies velocity (process of dying) causing momentum (balance), which allows resistance (living choice) within. Discerning to be resistance within the momentum of velocity allows one to reverse engineer the whole as the partial, hence growing comprehension (compression) as the perceiving (expression) within the perceivable (impressing).
d) resistance in short...ones need to resist want.
The goal is being suggested by others and represents what you want. Being directed within motion represents the need for your adaptation to origin. Even if you choose to ignore being directed by the natural order; for following the suggested orders by others...you would still adapt as the living within the process of dying (breathing; drinking; eating; sheltering etc.).
Doing this makes all the suggested goals either fleeting or always out of reach, while you spend your entire life to hold onto what can't be hold onto or to reach what won't fulfill you anyway. Instead of growing within the perceivable, you're tempted to get addicted to suggested loss...like every gambler. "winning" represents the sales-pitch to tempt one to gamble growth within loss.
What to do? Growing self discernment about being done by, hence representing the opportunity to "redo" aka to RE (response to) DO (being done by). Others suggest one what to "do" as to tempt one to ignore being the "re" (living) within the "do" (process of dying).
SIM'PLE, adjective [Latin simplex; sine, without and plex, plica, doubling, fold] - "single; consisting of one thing; uncompounded"...have you tried that? Asking others for suggested meaning implies ones choice to seek the compound among others, instead of growing self as the partial within the whole.
Resisting suggested compounding (e pluribus unum aka out of many, one) implies the struggle to sustain apartheid. The seed (choice) struggles to stay apart as to utilize the soil (balance) to grow within. If you compound the seeds, then you just tempt birds with a free meal, while spreading the seeds implies adaptation from the birds, who then have to work the fields, which in return implies your adaptation to work the fields and so on...working together through staying apart. Ones simple struggle has complex consequences to struggle within...
VEG'ETABLE, noun [Latin vigeo, to grow.]
AN'IMAL, noun [Latin anima, air, breath, soul.]
HU'MAN, adjective [Latin humanus; Heb. form, species.]
Resist the suggested "nothing" for the perceivable everything and you can discern that animal and human represent growth, that vegetable and human represent animation, and that animal and vegetable represent form within flow.
It's the labels others are suggesting, which when consented to, tempt one to ignore the perceivable, labeless behavior of form within flow aka to perceive moving differences as perceivable inspiration for adaptation.
a) "movement" implies MOVE (being moved by) MENT (mind/memory reacting to moving input).
b) life represents RE (response to) MOVE (being moved by), hence being removed (process of dying) while being alive within aka growth within loss.
c) discerning to be within (life) direction (inception towards death), allows further growth of comprehension about being reaction within direction, which implies reactors within a generator. Now keep using implication...if everything is generating; how can one thing within react to it? If the generator (loss) generates reactors (growth) to sustain itself, then being a reactor (growth) within a generator (loss) implies the temporary opportunity to...
d) if it's predetermined (destiny), then why ignore "pre" as the generator for everything perceivable...for suggested "aft" aka whatever others suggest comes after what now is?
Those who consent to suggested outcomes, while ignoring perceivable origin, give others the power to play "Final Destination" with them. https://pic8.co/sh/HdHYMa.jpg
Sleigh of hand: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8Y8XpFtLbk
"Fell Somethin' movin' all over me...Whatever it is no man can see"
"From the crown of ma' head to the soul of ma' feet...Spirit is movin', spirit is movin', spirit is movin' all-over me!"
"I Can't Stop Movin', Can't Can't Stop Movin', Can't Stop Movin', I Can't Keep Still"
Those (partial) within motion (whole) cannot STOP, noun - "cessation of progressive motion"...others can suggest progressivism to tempt one to view others as a stop-sign to ones progress. Ever been annoyed by that inner want to move on while standing at a stop-sign?