Trump was one of the most pro Israel presidents in history. So bizarre that they feel a need to censor and deplatform him... unless it's not really about antisemitism. What's it about? The desire to weaken and to destroy our country? That's what it seems like
The antisemitism stuff is very front-and-center, in a very unnatural way right now.
a) this represents the way (inception towards death) and this represents the center (life)
b) choice at the center of balance (need/want) aka perceivable (need) or suggested (want), can be tempted off-center through suggested imbalance (want vs not want).
c) antisemitism or any other suggested -ism tempts one to reason about it aka want vs not want; agree vs disagree; believe vs not believe, true vs false; good vs evil etc. Both sides fuel the suggestion for those suggesting it.
d) antisemitism as a liability shield only works because the many consent to make themselves liable by consenting to the suggested -isms from the few, which imbalances all the ignored choices of each one of the many towards the few chosen ones.
e) unnatural (suggested information) within natural (perceivable inspiration) represents ignorance of perceivable nature for what others suggest it means.
Fwiw i agree that trump was most likely doing his best with good intentions. O think there's more to it though- good wealth and entanglements with the establishment cause another theory to be plausible: stooge. But then again, he was comfortably off script on a number of topics. Why did he roll over on the results?
a) censorship can only control others if they are afraid to lose access if censored.
b) the world wide web represents the platform within which de-platforming is suggested (just like politics for left vs right divide). Underneath that...the screen represents the platform the few require the consent of the many for.
c) form (living) within flow (process of dying) becomes flat (plat) form if ignored to grow. Looking at a screen predominantly grows ignorance.
antisemitism...What's it about?
Consenting to want or not want the suggested -ism, gives the few suggesting the power to define; redefine and contradict it for the consenting many, which in return are busy reasoning (want vs not want) against each other about the suggested meaning.
The desire..
The few who suggest outcomes aren't tempted to reason (want vs not want) about them; they already comprehend the implication (if/then) of the many consenting to it...if ignoring to resist temptations; then lowered resistance, hence heightened opportunity to be exploited by temptations.
to destroy our...
a) the process of dying destroys those living within...unless resisted.
b) temporary (living) within ongoing (process of dying) cannot hold onto "ours" without ignoring to resist the temptation to want to hold onto temporary things that cannot be held onto.
Consider if living holding onto things within the process of dying represents "smothering" life to death, and then add the resistance spend to in the attempt to hold onto something? Notice furthermore that the elderly are struggling to let go when dying, and that they seek confirmation from those around to let go, to be absolved from burden...
There are two alternative meanings of the word 'misinformation':
either 'lies' as in deliberate distorted propaganda as used by the left, or 'anything that goes against our lying narrative!'
And who is better at lying than the white-hating ADL.
Truth that goes against the narrative would best be categorized as malinformation not mis- nor dis-.
"• Malinformation: Deliberate publication of private information for personal or private interest, as well as the deliberate manipulation of genuine content. Take note that these are not false information but instead, are real information based on reality, but are used and disseminated to harm others."
You are a fucking SHILL giving the government party line and hoping we won't spot it. You fucking son of a bitch government agent piece of shit. Now that I look over your comment history it's clear.
LaRouche was right, and they did their best to tear him up. When I was younger I believed their lies. After I got older I came to see how false much of the world is.
There are two alternative meanings of the word 'misinformation'
What if suggested information cannot define meaning; since only perceivable inspiration communicates predefined meaning?
What if the few suggest the many that suggested information can represent "truth"; which only then allows them to contradict it as "lie"? How would the many react to their suggested truth getting contradicted? By seeking more suggested truth...
What if truth (want) vs lie (not want) ignores change (need)?
I've observed that user for a long time and I suspect it is a combination of a psycho and a bot.. The constant word salad indicates either a bot meant to disrupt the site, or a guy with some mental problem, and either way it is spam.
It's like a collective case of borderline personality disorder, people with BPD pathologically and compulsively do everything they can to provoke others and then when they finally get a reaction they play victim and use the reaction as 'proof' that the other person had malicious intentions all along, and typically it's the people who have sacrificed the most and stuck around the longest who the BPD person antagonizes the most.
A lot of U.S. men went willingly into certain death in an effort to liberate and save jewish people in western germany (regardless of one's historical beliefs this is what those soldiers were dying for to the best of their understanding). Tons of money was spent. Jewish refugees were welcomed into the U.S. with open arms and actively supported and encouraged in taking powerful positions in government, finance, media, etc. White people of the U.S. went above and beyond to be there for jewish people around the world including ongoing unconditional support of israel.
So of course in typical BPD fashion white people in the U.S. are who the ADL tries to antagonize the most.
Why do people take the ADL seriously? Their website is basically satire at this point, fucking incredible just because something is an “organisation” people should listen to what it has to say as some kind of authority.
Rhetorical question of course… people are spastics.
Trump was one of the most pro Israel presidents in history. So bizarre that they feel a need to censor and deplatform him... unless it's not really about antisemitism. What's it about? The desire to weaken and to destroy our country? That's what it seems like
They put some of their strongest assets such as kanye and elon into play on this strategy
a) this represents the way (inception towards death) and this represents the center (life)
b) choice at the center of balance (need/want) aka perceivable (need) or suggested (want), can be tempted off-center through suggested imbalance (want vs not want).
c) antisemitism or any other suggested -ism tempts one to reason about it aka want vs not want; agree vs disagree; believe vs not believe, true vs false; good vs evil etc. Both sides fuel the suggestion for those suggesting it.
d) antisemitism as a liability shield only works because the many consent to make themselves liable by consenting to the suggested -isms from the few, which imbalances all the ignored choices of each one of the many towards the few chosen ones.
e) unnatural (suggested information) within natural (perceivable inspiration) represents ignorance of perceivable nature for what others suggest it means.
Fwiw i agree that trump was most likely doing his best with good intentions. O think there's more to it though- good wealth and entanglements with the establishment cause another theory to be plausible: stooge. But then again, he was comfortably off script on a number of topics. Why did he roll over on the results?
a) censorship can only control others if they are afraid to lose access if censored.
b) the world wide web represents the platform within which de-platforming is suggested (just like politics for left vs right divide). Underneath that...the screen represents the platform the few require the consent of the many for.
c) form (living) within flow (process of dying) becomes flat (plat) form if ignored to grow. Looking at a screen predominantly grows ignorance.
Consenting to want or not want the suggested -ism, gives the few suggesting the power to define; redefine and contradict it for the consenting many, which in return are busy reasoning (want vs not want) against each other about the suggested meaning.
The few who suggest outcomes aren't tempted to reason (want vs not want) about them; they already comprehend the implication (if/then) of the many consenting to it...if ignoring to resist temptations; then lowered resistance, hence heightened opportunity to be exploited by temptations.
a) the process of dying destroys those living within...unless resisted.
b) temporary (living) within ongoing (process of dying) cannot hold onto "ours" without ignoring to resist the temptation to want to hold onto temporary things that cannot be held onto.
Consider if living holding onto things within the process of dying represents "smothering" life to death, and then add the resistance spend to in the attempt to hold onto something? Notice furthermore that the elderly are struggling to let go when dying, and that they seek confirmation from those around to let go, to be absolved from burden...
There are two alternative meanings of the word 'misinformation': either 'lies' as in deliberate distorted propaganda as used by the left, or 'anything that goes against our lying narrative!'
And who is better at lying than the white-hating ADL.
Disagree. 'anything that goes against our lying narrative!' that is TRUE would be malinformation.
So you're suggesting our side would lie against a lie, and truth can be considered malinformation. Ooookay.
Truth that goes against the narrative would best be categorized as malinformation not mis- nor dis-.
"• Malinformation: Deliberate publication of private information for personal or private interest, as well as the deliberate manipulation of genuine content. Take note that these are not false information but instead, are real information based on reality, but are used and disseminated to harm others."
https://www.konsyse.com/articles/misinformation-vs-disinformation-vs-malinformation/
You motherfucker. You are exactly parroting the "Disinformation Governance Board".
https://theintercept.com/2022/10/31/social-media-disinformation-dhs/
You are a fucking SHILL giving the government party line and hoping we won't spot it. You fucking son of a bitch government agent piece of shit. Now that I look over your comment history it's clear.
You're sus as fuck, bub.
Mis, dis, and mal.
Much more complicated than it needs to be intentionally.
These are the exact terms used by the government censorship board. wereonit is obviously a shill.
LaRouche was right, and they did their best to tear him up. When I was younger I believed their lies. After I got older I came to see how false much of the world is.
What if suggested information cannot define meaning; since only perceivable inspiration communicates predefined meaning?
What if the few suggest the many that suggested information can represent "truth"; which only then allows them to contradict it as "lie"? How would the many react to their suggested truth getting contradicted? By seeking more suggested truth...
What if truth (want) vs lie (not want) ignores change (need)?
You're a fucking lunatic and I am pretty sick and tired of your psycho bullshit.
user is just doing an online version of what LouisCK got busted for. or user could be AI.
I've observed that user for a long time and I suspect it is a combination of a psycho and a bot.. The constant word salad indicates either a bot meant to disrupt the site, or a guy with some mental problem, and either way it is spam.
How does nature communicate information without suggestion? How does nature offend those within?
It's like a collective case of borderline personality disorder, people with BPD pathologically and compulsively do everything they can to provoke others and then when they finally get a reaction they play victim and use the reaction as 'proof' that the other person had malicious intentions all along, and typically it's the people who have sacrificed the most and stuck around the longest who the BPD person antagonizes the most.
A lot of U.S. men went willingly into certain death in an effort to liberate and save jewish people in western germany (regardless of one's historical beliefs this is what those soldiers were dying for to the best of their understanding). Tons of money was spent. Jewish refugees were welcomed into the U.S. with open arms and actively supported and encouraged in taking powerful positions in government, finance, media, etc. White people of the U.S. went above and beyond to be there for jewish people around the world including ongoing unconditional support of israel.
So of course in typical BPD fashion white people in the U.S. are who the ADL tries to antagonize the most.
Most jews deserve impalement.
Help us Vlad, you’re our only hope!
Why do people take the ADL seriously? Their website is basically satire at this point, fucking incredible just because something is an “organisation” people should listen to what it has to say as some kind of authority.
Rhetorical question of course… people are spastics.
How much would it disappoint you if I told you that Bannon is just a zionist jew cuckboy? Sorry, man.
https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/15JUHGyLBq/steven-bannon-is-just-a-zionist-/c
VLAD THE IMPALER WARNS ADL TO CEASE AND DESIST OR ELSE FACE POTENTIAL IMPALEMENTS