Trump was one of the most pro Israel presidents in history. So bizarre that they feel a need to censor and deplatform him... unless it's not really about antisemitism. What's it about? The desire to weaken and to destroy our country? That's what it seems like
The antisemitism stuff is very front-and-center, in a very unnatural way right now.
a) this represents the way (inception towards death) and this represents the center (life)
b) choice at the center of balance (need/want) aka perceivable (need) or suggested (want), can be tempted off-center through suggested imbalance (want vs not want).
c) antisemitism or any other suggested -ism tempts one to reason about it aka want vs not want; agree vs disagree; believe vs not believe, true vs false; good vs evil etc. Both sides fuel the suggestion for those suggesting it.
d) antisemitism as a liability shield only works because the many consent to make themselves liable by consenting to the suggested -isms from the few, which imbalances all the ignored choices of each one of the many towards the few chosen ones.
e) unnatural (suggested information) within natural (perceivable inspiration) represents ignorance of perceivable nature for what others suggest it means.
Fwiw i agree that trump was most likely doing his best with good intentions. O think there's more to it though- good wealth and entanglements with the establishment cause another theory to be plausible: stooge. But then again, he was comfortably off script on a number of topics. Why did he roll over on the results?
a) censorship can only control others if they are afraid to lose access if censored.
b) the world wide web represents the platform within which de-platforming is suggested (just like politics for left vs right divide). Underneath that...the screen represents the platform the few require the consent of the many for.
c) form (living) within flow (process of dying) becomes flat (plat) form if ignored to grow. Looking at a screen predominantly grows ignorance.
antisemitism...What's it about?
Consenting to want or not want the suggested -ism, gives the few suggesting the power to define; redefine and contradict it for the consenting many, which in return are busy reasoning (want vs not want) against each other about the suggested meaning.
The desire..
The few who suggest outcomes aren't tempted to reason (want vs not want) about them; they already comprehend the implication (if/then) of the many consenting to it...if ignoring to resist temptations; then lowered resistance, hence heightened opportunity to be exploited by temptations.
to destroy our...
a) the process of dying destroys those living within...unless resisted.
b) temporary (living) within ongoing (process of dying) cannot hold onto "ours" without ignoring to resist the temptation to want to hold onto temporary things that cannot be held onto.
Consider if living holding onto things within the process of dying represents "smothering" life to death, and then add the resistance spend to in the attempt to hold onto something? Notice furthermore that the elderly are struggling to let go when dying, and that they seek confirmation from those around to let go, to be absolved from burden...
Trump was one of the most pro Israel presidents in history. So bizarre that they feel a need to censor and deplatform him... unless it's not really about antisemitism. What's it about? The desire to weaken and to destroy our country? That's what it seems like
They put some of their strongest assets such as kanye and elon into play on this strategy
a) this represents the way (inception towards death) and this represents the center (life)
b) choice at the center of balance (need/want) aka perceivable (need) or suggested (want), can be tempted off-center through suggested imbalance (want vs not want).
c) antisemitism or any other suggested -ism tempts one to reason about it aka want vs not want; agree vs disagree; believe vs not believe, true vs false; good vs evil etc. Both sides fuel the suggestion for those suggesting it.
d) antisemitism as a liability shield only works because the many consent to make themselves liable by consenting to the suggested -isms from the few, which imbalances all the ignored choices of each one of the many towards the few chosen ones.
e) unnatural (suggested information) within natural (perceivable inspiration) represents ignorance of perceivable nature for what others suggest it means.
Fwiw i agree that trump was most likely doing his best with good intentions. O think there's more to it though- good wealth and entanglements with the establishment cause another theory to be plausible: stooge. But then again, he was comfortably off script on a number of topics. Why did he roll over on the results?
a) censorship can only control others if they are afraid to lose access if censored.
b) the world wide web represents the platform within which de-platforming is suggested (just like politics for left vs right divide). Underneath that...the screen represents the platform the few require the consent of the many for.
c) form (living) within flow (process of dying) becomes flat (plat) form if ignored to grow. Looking at a screen predominantly grows ignorance.
Consenting to want or not want the suggested -ism, gives the few suggesting the power to define; redefine and contradict it for the consenting many, which in return are busy reasoning (want vs not want) against each other about the suggested meaning.
The few who suggest outcomes aren't tempted to reason (want vs not want) about them; they already comprehend the implication (if/then) of the many consenting to it...if ignoring to resist temptations; then lowered resistance, hence heightened opportunity to be exploited by temptations.
a) the process of dying destroys those living within...unless resisted.
b) temporary (living) within ongoing (process of dying) cannot hold onto "ours" without ignoring to resist the temptation to want to hold onto temporary things that cannot be held onto.
Consider if living holding onto things within the process of dying represents "smothering" life to death, and then add the resistance spend to in the attempt to hold onto something? Notice furthermore that the elderly are struggling to let go when dying, and that they seek confirmation from those around to let go, to be absolved from burden...