a) censorship can only control others if they are afraid to lose access if censored.
b) the world wide web represents the platform within which de-platforming is suggested (just like politics for left vs right divide). Underneath that...the screen represents the platform the few require the consent of the many for.
c) form (living) within flow (process of dying) becomes flat (plat) form if ignored to grow. Looking at a screen predominantly grows ignorance.
antisemitism...What's it about?
Consenting to want or not want the suggested -ism, gives the few suggesting the power to define; redefine and contradict it for the consenting many, which in return are busy reasoning (want vs not want) against each other about the suggested meaning.
The desire..
The few who suggest outcomes aren't tempted to reason (want vs not want) about them; they already comprehend the implication (if/then) of the many consenting to it...if ignoring to resist temptations; then lowered resistance, hence heightened opportunity to be exploited by temptations.
to destroy our...
a) the process of dying destroys those living within...unless resisted.
b) temporary (living) within ongoing (process of dying) cannot hold onto "ours" without ignoring to resist the temptation to want to hold onto temporary things that cannot be held onto.
Consider if living holding onto things within the process of dying represents "smothering" life to death, and then add the resistance spend to in the attempt to hold onto something? Notice furthermore that the elderly are struggling to let go when dying, and that they seek confirmation from those around to let go, to be absolved from burden...
a) censorship can only control others if they are afraid to lose access if censored.
b) the world wide web represents the platform within which de-platforming is suggested (just like politics for left vs right divide). Underneath that...the screen represents the platform the few require the consent of the many for.
c) form (living) within flow (process of dying) becomes flat (plat) form if ignored to grow. Looking at a screen predominantly grows ignorance.
Consenting to want or not want the suggested -ism, gives the few suggesting the power to define; redefine and contradict it for the consenting many, which in return are busy reasoning (want vs not want) against each other about the suggested meaning.
The few who suggest outcomes aren't tempted to reason (want vs not want) about them; they already comprehend the implication (if/then) of the many consenting to it...if ignoring to resist temptations; then lowered resistance, hence heightened opportunity to be exploited by temptations.
a) the process of dying destroys those living within...unless resisted.
b) temporary (living) within ongoing (process of dying) cannot hold onto "ours" without ignoring to resist the temptation to want to hold onto temporary things that cannot be held onto.
Consider if living holding onto things within the process of dying represents "smothering" life to death, and then add the resistance spend to in the attempt to hold onto something? Notice furthermore that the elderly are struggling to let go when dying, and that they seek confirmation from those around to let go, to be absolved from burden...