Flat Earth Psy Op is the Real Conspiracy - Talmudic crimes
(www.henrymakow.com)
Comments (53)
sorted by:
I think you nailed it here, basically the entire point of such a hypothesis is to remove capability on other inputs that may infringe if you choose to believe. This is the same as the origins of the flat earth theory as it is today, much like many of the other brain drain time waste bullshit that is pushed.
I find FE makes me think more.
Every piece of evidence they throw at you supporting FE can be debunked by learning a bit more physics or geometry. It's been a good exercise for the old head muscles.
I've debunked it multiple times using simple geometry, you keep going back to "muh curves".
As for thinking, you actually posted something about how the light on the moon didn't line up with the sun, it was futher back, so how could it "curve"?
Well, that got me thinking but I figured it out with a tennis ball and a soccer ball.
If you were standing directly between the sun and moon, the crescent would be thicker closer to the sun. However, if you are to either side, you don't actually see the whole crescent and so the thickest point no longer lines up with the sun.
I didn't see this in some video on Youtube like where you get all your info, I just did the experiment for myself.
Good point the timing on this is really telling. Came doing save time as 2016 election targeted at alt right sources to mitigate their influence
naw man i assure its not that, alot of Pro Flat earthers were at one time interested in space. I loved space(or modern cosmology), all my favorite shows growing up involved space and or extraterrestrials. Even space conspiracies, like life on mars, or that we might have come from there millions of years ago.
ohh Nibiru was huge one for me too. I fucking loved that idea of another hidden planet on a 3500 years orbit. life on Jupiter's moons, space is so interesting that you could spend a lifetime just thinking about it.
its a time sink, the ultimate time sink. that alot of us fell into
the thing that broke it for me was the constellations. they never change and have been the same since inception. no matter what night, no matter what time of the year, if you look up into the sky you see the same thing.
if you look up at the north star on the shortest day of the year, the stars are in the same place as they are on the longest day of the year. all spinning around Polaris which is in the same spot. this shouldn't be the case if we were actually spinning around the sun moving thru the milky way
Unless those stars were ridiculously far away...
our "planet" has a tilt while it rotates, meaning the visible sky should also tilt with the planet as it travels around the suns. this is why we apprentilly have seasons.
all good right? well no because our view doesn't tilt along with the planet. the stars are in the same spot no matter what
No.
No.
Tilt of Earth axis to the plane of Earth orbit is fixed. Rotation around a sun does not change this tilt. However we look at stars from different places in different seasons, so closest are slightly change positions during the year. It is named parallax and that is how we know distances to the stars. There is another thing named precession, but it is a very slow process with a 26000 years period. So, no, stars are not in the same places around the year. Usual things for rotating bodies you could easily observe by yourself. Didn't you play with a humming top in childhood?
Interesting, why every single flat-eather never ever did his own research, never played with a telescope, satellite receiver, powerful laser, whatever, only copypasting same false statements and links to shitty fake videos for years?
How can you define for others what "is"; when you represent a reaction to what is moving you?
What's the perceivable origin for these suggestions? How does perceivable reality communicate these to you? Why does it seem so easy to you to suggest ten negations of reality in response to others? How could one negate reality while being the reaction within in?
NEGATION, noun - "denial, description by denial, exclusion or exception"...what is excluded from perceivable reality? What can you deny reality?
They aren't, and humans have known this for centuries.
They look like they don't move because they're VERY FAR AWAY.
Take a ride on the bus. Look out the window. The grass beside you zips by. The barn across the field takes 5 minutes to pass by. The Sun doesn't appear to move at all (although it actually does). All of these things are moving at the exact same speed relative to you (the speed of the bus), but look like they move at different speeds because of distance.
I find it incredible that FE believers think they're so perceptive because they watched some Youtube videos but have never taken the time to observe reality.
Flat Earth arguments are highly compelling. I can't say I agree unless I did the tests myself. But based on what I've seen I am at least sure that they've lied to us about the Earth in major ways. I can't say 100% how or why but the stench of LIES permeates them on this topic. Astronauts contradictory statements. Seeing mountains that shouldn't be present with a curve. Clear stench of lies.
Exactly. Flat Earthers have no idea what is true or not, only that they've been LIED to by SOMEONE.
The existence of time zones completely debunks FE, period. Not to mention the fact that the sun always rises in the East and sets in the West, everywhere on Earth. Get yourself a frisbee and a tennis ball and figure that one out.
Fed fags really ramping up the anti-fe lately across all platforms.
If you agree with kikepedia on any conspiracy you're a retarded faggot.
You do know how Operation Mockingbird works don't you?
Yes. But i dont see your point. The mockingbird media isnt pushing flat earth. If anything it is mocking it. Much like it mocks anti vaxxers, 911 conspiracies, those who said pedophilia was rampant in hollywood, Clinton paid for the dossier, etc.
What is your point?
The Flat Earth is used to make all other conspiracy theories look stupid. It's a tool used by TPTB to say "look at these idiots, they think the earth is flat AND X" Where X is the real target - like "vaccines aren't safe".
Who gives a shit about the curve? Light does all kinds of crazy crap, not to mention how optical illusions can mess with your eyes.
Let's talk basic geometry regaeding FE.
Explain time zones.
Explain how the sun rises in the East and sets in the West everywhere and everyday.
If the Earth was a disc, with the North Pole in the center and the South Pole a ring around the outside, the sun would rise in a different direction, and travel in a different direction, for everyone, depending on their location.
But no, the sun is a psyop...
you miss the point entirely (as you admit).
https://www.thedailyplane.com/the-modern-operation-mockingbird-cointelpro-alex-jones-eddie-bravo-joe-rogan-flat-earth/
always with the vague uestions, so few users here its so obvious when you fed fags keep using the same tactics. go have another tranny meeting nigger lover
you stupid cunt
lmao called out fed
FOUND THE FED-FAGGATRON.
you fucking retarded idiot
A/S/L?
If anyone wants to actually look into the flat earther side and hear it out hear it out instead of defaulting to their "I MUST IMMEDITEALLY DEBOONK THIS" programming.... Heres some resources to look into. Pick you favorite "flat earth deboonked" argument and find the relevant video.
https://archive.ph/nI0Om
Flat earth has been debunked. They did it to themselves with lasers in a documentary. You can watch it for yourself. What really intrigues me about FE is the idea that the devil is creating a mass illusion to us all see what is not real. So we're living in a simulation. Not reality. The devil is responsible. Is it so? I don't know. I'm not religious.
This is the same old trick these Marxists ALWAYS use - blame people for the things they themselves are guilty of.
No, I’m afraid it’s you who come in here trying to pick fights with FEs who glow.
Flat Earthers need to really fucking shut the fuck up with their bullshit. Operation Mockingbird
This response is the perfect example of a lifetime of programming. Flat earthers on the other hand will discuss their stance in depth because they took the time to overcome that programming.
i've flown around the world
why is Northern Star not visible from what we call the southern hemisphere?
True. The flat earth psyop is entirely real, and this website is a great example of it.
Why would anyone feel the need to further advertise that an ostensibly stupid idea (the world is flat) needs to be avoided because it is too stupid to bother with?
Methinks the woman doth protest too much - eh?
Please join us on flatearthresearch to further discuss the psyop and the reasons for its massive funding!
hahaha, the only way I am coming is if you promise me some nice full body earth shots without any photoshop mods. and I don't mean none of those half monte shots, I want the full monte.
Lol, there are no such shots regardless of the shape of the world :(. The ones from nasa et al that aren’t photoshopped (i.e. art built of composites) are clearly fraudulent (have no consistency - land mass sizes are all wrong etc.)
In any case, i have many pictures of bigfoot, ghosts, and the loch ness monster for you (all not photoshopped) if you want to base your reality on unreliable photos.
On the other hand, there are more reliable ways to determine the shape of the world than abject appeal to authority and belief in their “photos” that are well worth discussing/exploring if you are interested!
It was more of a joke about how there is no direct evidence we are indeed on a round planet. There is also no available evidence that proves we are on a flat earth.
Both ideas are created to consume your energy and time, thousands of years ago they needed an explanation, someone created one and provided it, since that time it has been used.
I have no interest in the topic, I could give a shit either way, Once the evidence is worthy, I will find it in memes.
If you want to talk about the control structures that are subverting the people and everything else then I am inclined to listen and learn what you got.
I think both statements are incorrect. Evidence is easy/trivial. When people believed in zeus throwing lightning bolts and crying tears to make rain - they had plenty of “evidence”. When people today want to believe any “fact” - evidence abounds and for the same reasons it did then.
There is evidence to support, ostensibly anyhow, that the earth is spherical - which is partially why it has been believed for so long. There is also evidence to support that the world is not spherical the way we are taught, and cannot be. In my view/experience/research the evidence is MUCH stronger and more scientifically consistent with the latter view. But evidence most often doesn’t prove something true the way we would hope/like. Just because something has evidence supporting it, doesn’t make it correct (or vice versa) - right?
I roughly agree.
Fair enough! It’s not for everybody, but it is an extremely valuable and rewarding subject if pursued earnestly. It’s not really so much about the shape of the world, but more about discerning what you know from what you believe/were conditioned to parrot, determining how to validate such knowledge, and how to best share that knowledge and its validation with others. In our regrettable “infowar” era, these are critical skills that the vast majority of us lack and are trained to neglect.
There are many such memes available. But memes are marketing tools - “ads” effectively. They are for convincing/manipulation, not for teaching, learning or research.
In my view it is more fundamental to recognize that the original spherical posit (and evidences supporting it) is unworthy (scientifically, historically, etc.) than it is to recognize alternative posits worthy based on some contrived evidence to ostensibly support them.
Sounds good to me! However, i am interested in collaborative discussion and exchange - not lecture! I am merely a fellow student, not a teacher.
I would say that the most fundamental control structures are “education”/“media” (conditioning by rote from childhood under the guise of education) and “money”. Money and education don’t have to be the yokes that they demonstrably are, but we have allowed them to be controlled by our enemy, the slavers/profiteers, to our express detriment.