It was more of a joke about how there is no direct evidence we are indeed on a round planet. There is also no available evidence that proves we are on a flat earth.

I think both statements are incorrect. Evidence is easy/trivial. When people believed in zeus throwing lightning bolts and crying tears to make rain - they had plenty of “evidence”. When people today want to believe any “fact” - evidence abounds and for the same reasons it did then.

There is evidence to support, ostensibly anyhow, that the earth is spherical - which is partially why it has been believed for so long. There is also evidence to support that the world is not spherical the way we are taught, and cannot be. In my view/experience/research the evidence is MUCH stronger and more scientifically consistent with the latter view. But evidence most often doesn’t prove something true the way we would hope/like. Just because something has evidence supporting it, doesn’t make it correct (or vice versa) - right?

they needed an explanation, someone created one and provided it, since that time it has been used.

I roughly agree.

I have no interest in the topic

Fair enough! It’s not for everybody, but it is an extremely valuable and rewarding subject if pursued earnestly. It’s not really so much about the shape of the world, but more about discerning what you know from what you believe/were conditioned to parrot, determining how to validate such knowledge, and how to best share that knowledge and its validation with others. In our regrettable “infowar” era, these are critical skills that the vast majority of us lack and are trained to neglect.

Once the evidence is worthy, I will find it in memes.

There are many such memes available. But memes are marketing tools - “ads” effectively. They are for convincing/manipulation, not for teaching, learning or research.

In my view it is more fundamental to recognize that the original spherical posit (and evidences supporting it) is unworthy (scientifically, historically, etc.) than it is to recognize alternative posits worthy based on some contrived evidence to ostensibly support them.

If you want to talk about the control structures that are subverting the people and everything else then I am inclined to listen and learn what you got.

Sounds good to me! However, i am interested in collaborative discussion and exchange - not lecture! I am merely a fellow student, not a teacher.

I would say that the most fundamental control structures are “education”/“media” (conditioning by rote from childhood under the guise of education) and “money”. Money and education don’t have to be the yokes that they demonstrably are, but we have allowed them to be controlled by our enemy, the slavers/profiteers, to our express detriment.