Bruv, you could just say what you mean. It's obvious that the lander looks flimsy. Are the joints welded to some insane specification; is the chassis effectively immune to any sort of shocks? It's not hard to avoid stupid internet name-calling.
It doesn't look flimsy at all. Some people love to claim it to use it as an argument for their denial of the moon landings but that's just circular reasoning.
Have you ever seen a full picture of it or one without the thermal blankets? It's huge and massive. It's made from aluminum and titanium.
I never looked into the moon landing conspiracy prior to American Moon. Always just played both sides of the fence--- Like, sure we went to the moon, but we also got Kubrick to film it as a backup in case we failed so we wouldn't look like assholes to the world.
Nope. We just faked that shit entirely, and we didn't even do a good job.
I've still not found a Christian who can explain how XX Mary ends up with an XY Jesus. That Y chromosome came from somewhere, Joseph, start asking some questions!
"Uhhhh....uhhhhhh...... n..nooooo I'm still a virgin....it muuuust have been that spooky ghost that made me pregnant... I would nEvEr cheat I pwomise...."
The God in "In God We Trust" isn't the Christian God. Its the God of this world. You know, the man downstairs, the great and mighty blouse-wearing--tittay-having-half-goat-faggot-god. Lord of the flies. Yeah that bitch.
Between July and October of 1967, NASA was on a mission to turn a 500-foot-by-500-foot site just outside of Flagstaff, Arizona, into a mirror image of a portion of the moon’s surface. Armed with tons of TNT and ammonium nitrate, NASA worked with the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) to blast craters into this swath of land chosen for its many layers of volcanic cinders, which approximated the look and feel of the moon’s surface. Workers used satellite imagery as their guide to duplicate the topography on a 1:1 scale. Over the course of the next 120 days, workers created 47 craters with diameters measuring between 5 feet and 43 feet, approximating Mare Tranquillitatis (Sea of Tranquility), Apollo 11’s planned lunar landing site.
They also compartmentalized everything. They hired like a thousand people and no one knew what the big picture was. They were just told to make suits, or rocks, etc. They had no clue they were building a training set for astronauts, as the conspiracy theory goes.
But if they were going to fake it, they definitely had a place to do it.
One thing I didnt hear joe mention. If you speed the footage up of them moving around and jumping where you can see their feet. It looks like they are just doing normal shit in normal gravity. But like joe says, maybe shit just looks weird like that in low gravity. How do we know?
I say supposedly, because while people seem to agree thats its possible, I cant actually find any proof of anyone doing it other than nasa or the universities that help them. And a episode of big bang theory lmao.
I figured with a strong enough laser its true, But I dont understand why you couldnt just shoot a missile there and parachute it down.
Led me down the rabbit hole about what the reflector was made of.
Same thing thats in most electronics. Synthetic quartz. It would likely survive a minor collision with the moon. And on a side note, the quartz works in electronic, like the semiconductor, through some bizarre quirks in quantum mechanics. If humans really did figure this out, without some ancient technology or crashed alien wreckage as a blueprint, I feel like they got lucky as hell.
If you watch how it works and how they make it, reminds me of the books/tv/movies, where you see aliens using crystals for their technology. Could just be my overactive imagination though.
Totally, but the lies have traditionally been concealed within factual information.
When the number of people sophisticated enough to call it out gets large enough, the next step is to undermine their sources of information to the point where they don't know what to believe--in essense corrupting what the people who spend time to educate themselves are able to learn. I think we're at that stage now and I think you and I are on the same page about that. I'm just pointing out that the idea that deceiving the public has become so pervasive as to be Orwellian or Kafkaesque (everything is a lie) in and of itself furthers the aim of having people not know what to believe.
We flew through the Van Allen belts, and then disembarked in a duct taped aluminum foil popcorn bag, landed on the moon, then lifted back off hours later and reconnected with the mothership, flew back through the Van Allen belts, and then reentered Earth's atmosphere, safely. And then we lost all the important footage of the events, except for the moonwalking. And then we also lost all the knowledge and ability to do it again.
Are you suggesting that it's possible I am exhibiting traits of gullibility by not believing all that?
One of the examples I used was about the flashes of light astronauts seen. The original Apollo team didnt mention anything about it, or if they did they were ignored. But later apollo teams do mention flashes of light. So I was wrong about that. But seems strange to me that its 21st century and we still dont have any clue what is happening.
I want to believe we made it, but the biggest driver for the space race was war. He who controls the moon, controls the world. Why do you need a nuclear weapon when you can hurl boulders from the moon.
In his January 1958 talk, Boushey acknowledged that there existed in the nascent U.S. space community "divided opinion as to whether or not a manned or unmanned moon base has any military significance." He then presented arguments in favor of a military lunar base.
The moon, he explained, is 239,000 miles away, a distance a rocket might cross in about two days. Boushey noted that the moon is a synchronous rotator, which means that it keeps the same face turned always toward Earth. Telescopes on the moon's Earth-facing Nearside could thus monitor military activities on the revolving Earth as they passed in and out of view. Boushey estimated that objects as small as 100 feet wide might be visible. Conversely, the Farside hemisphere is always turned away from Earth. Boushey believed that this would make it an ideal location for the conduct of secret military operations beyond the gaze of prying eyes in Russia.
Earth's moon, Boushey declared, could also provide "a retaliation base of unequaled advantage." If the U.S. gained control of the moon, then the Soviets would be unable to attack the United States without suffering "sure and massive destruction." They could either attack the U.S. first and endure a counter-strike from the moon about 48 hours later, or they could launch missiles at the moon first. The U.S. military lunar base would, of course, immediately detect the light and heat of the Soviet missiles' rocket exhaust and retaliate.
Boushey then spoke what are probably the most famous words in his speech: that "[i]t has been said that 'he who controls the moon controls the earth.' Our planners must carefully evaluate this statement for, if true -- and I, for one, think it is -- then the U.S. must control the moon."
I used to be in the same camp. But when you couple these direct bits of fakery evidence with some of the more snaky indirect bits (like Buzz Aldrin using threatening language about sicking the CIA on a documentary producer, etc., and then you look at the comparison of Kubrick's front projection technique to the moon footage, it's tough to maintain any doubt that the whole thing was fake. What about the fact that they had tested the lunar lander on Earth and it flipped upside-down and burned? But then they were able to launch it out of a spacecraft orbiting the moon and land exactly where they wanted to and then take back off and rendezvous with that same spacecraft… The odds of that all happening are ludicrous lmfao.
Even the phone call by Nixon is so ridiculous. We're gonna have a two way comm to the moon in 1969 with 5-10 sec of latency and no issues? I'm guessing this call took place during the day when the moon wasn't even visible in the sky, also. So that means Houston had some kind of network relay around the world to a location that did have line of sight with the moon, and where there was a large comms array there? They just didn't even bother with the details. And clearly it never mattered, most people were dumbfounded by their television sets and that was enough.
Just look at that flimsy stupid thing anyways, You’d have to be a retard to think that’s a real craft of any kind.
Held together with scotch tape and sticktoitiveness.
I've got a hat made out of Apollo tin foil
I've got a pet rock fom the moon. His name is Hal.
ROFLMFAO....funnnny...!
Sticktoitiveness omfg 🤣
Have ever looked at the specs of the Lunar Lander? They are public so I find it ver strange how you can make such a nonsensical claim.
What makes you think that it is flimsy?
look at it
Yes I have. Now please explain what is flimsy about it.
If i need to explain how flimsy this thing looks then, like I said, you’re probably retarded.
If you cannot explain what you mean then you are an ignorant idiot.
Bruv, you could just say what you mean. It's obvious that the lander looks flimsy. Are the joints welded to some insane specification; is the chassis effectively immune to any sort of shocks? It's not hard to avoid stupid internet name-calling.
It doesn't look flimsy at all. Some people love to claim it to use it as an argument for their denial of the moon landings but that's just circular reasoning.
Have you ever seen a full picture of it or one without the thermal blankets? It's huge and massive. It's made from aluminum and titanium.
You're free to believe that.
not a rule
a bit extreme
In case you're interested in shattering any doubt about the moon landing being faked:
https://youtu.be/KpuKu3F0BvY
American Moon is a killer doc!
I never looked into the moon landing conspiracy prior to American Moon. Always just played both sides of the fence--- Like, sure we went to the moon, but we also got Kubrick to film it as a backup in case we failed so we wouldn't look like assholes to the world.
Nope. We just faked that shit entirely, and we didn't even do a good job.
NASA faked that shit to the bank!
I've still not found a Christian who can explain how XX Mary ends up with an XY Jesus. That Y chromosome came from somewhere, Joseph, start asking some questions!
"Uhhhh....uhhhhhh...... n..nooooo I'm still a virgin....it muuuust have been that spooky ghost that made me pregnant... I would nEvEr cheat I pwomise...."
Lmao
I saw a movie about America being founded - IT'S A FAKE!
The God in "In God We Trust" isn't the Christian God. Its the God of this world. You know, the man downstairs, the great and mighty blouse-wearing--tittay-having-half-goat-faggot-god. Lord of the flies. Yeah that bitch.
Kubrick?
Absolutely.
where is the proof of this?
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/travel/going-moon-apollo-11-astronauts-trained-these-five-sites-180972452/
They also compartmentalized everything. They hired like a thousand people and no one knew what the big picture was. They were just told to make suits, or rocks, etc. They had no clue they were building a training set for astronauts, as the conspiracy theory goes.
But if they were going to fake it, they definitely had a place to do it.
Some hearsay on the joe rogan show.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JOi2Pl-lBeU
One thing I didnt hear joe mention. If you speed the footage up of them moving around and jumping where you can see their feet. It looks like they are just doing normal shit in normal gravity. But like joe says, maybe shit just looks weird like that in low gravity. How do we know?
An example. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ae_obIu0Zgg
Isn't there some reflector they left behind or something that supposedly proves they were there?
They did. With a strong enough laser you can measure the distance to the moon yourself, supposedly.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsRsap2_RAc
I say supposedly, because while people seem to agree thats its possible, I cant actually find any proof of anyone doing it other than nasa or the universities that help them. And a episode of big bang theory lmao.
I figured with a strong enough laser its true, But I dont understand why you couldnt just shoot a missile there and parachute it down.
Led me down the rabbit hole about what the reflector was made of.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WmcbMh4Llk
Same thing thats in most electronics. Synthetic quartz. It would likely survive a minor collision with the moon. And on a side note, the quartz works in electronic, like the semiconductor, through some bizarre quirks in quantum mechanics. If humans really did figure this out, without some ancient technology or crashed alien wreckage as a blueprint, I feel like they got lucky as hell.
If you watch how it works and how they make it, reminds me of the books/tv/movies, where you see aliens using crystals for their technology. Could just be my overactive imagination though.
And a fag...I mean flag.
Hopefully they leave a fag the next time
The trick is the absurd statement that the government lies all of the time.
Ok 99.999999998% of the time
Lying about everything would be a dead giveaway. Much better to deliver a drop of poison at the opportune time, don't you think?
Totally, but the lies have traditionally been concealed within factual information.
When the number of people sophisticated enough to call it out gets large enough, the next step is to undermine their sources of information to the point where they don't know what to believe--in essense corrupting what the people who spend time to educate themselves are able to learn. I think we're at that stage now and I think you and I are on the same page about that. I'm just pointing out that the idea that deceiving the public has become so pervasive as to be Orwellian or Kafkaesque (everything is a lie) in and of itself furthers the aim of having people not know what to believe.
This post title is 100% true.
The absolute state, with regards to gullibility and stupidity, in this country, is unforgivable.
Yeah that's a two way street haus
We flew through the Van Allen belts, and then disembarked in a duct taped aluminum foil popcorn bag, landed on the moon, then lifted back off hours later and reconnected with the mothership, flew back through the Van Allen belts, and then reentered Earth's atmosphere, safely. And then we lost all the important footage of the events, except for the moonwalking. And then we also lost all the knowledge and ability to do it again.
Are you suggesting that it's possible I am exhibiting traits of gullibility by not believing all that?
I am torn.
One of the examples I used was about the flashes of light astronauts seen. The original Apollo team didnt mention anything about it, or if they did they were ignored. But later apollo teams do mention flashes of light. So I was wrong about that. But seems strange to me that its 21st century and we still dont have any clue what is happening.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gn26xDLL5R4
I want to believe we made it, but the biggest driver for the space race was war. He who controls the moon, controls the world. Why do you need a nuclear weapon when you can hurl boulders from the moon.
So we either made it there, and there are bases.
Or we didnt and theyve been lying about it.
I used to be in the same camp. But when you couple these direct bits of fakery evidence with some of the more snaky indirect bits (like Buzz Aldrin using threatening language about sicking the CIA on a documentary producer, etc., and then you look at the comparison of Kubrick's front projection technique to the moon footage, it's tough to maintain any doubt that the whole thing was fake. What about the fact that they had tested the lunar lander on Earth and it flipped upside-down and burned? But then they were able to launch it out of a spacecraft orbiting the moon and land exactly where they wanted to and then take back off and rendezvous with that same spacecraft… The odds of that all happening are ludicrous lmfao.
Even the phone call by Nixon is so ridiculous. We're gonna have a two way comm to the moon in 1969 with 5-10 sec of latency and no issues? I'm guessing this call took place during the day when the moon wasn't even visible in the sky, also. So that means Houston had some kind of network relay around the world to a location that did have line of sight with the moon, and where there was a large comms array there? They just didn't even bother with the details. And clearly it never mattered, most people were dumbfounded by their television sets and that was enough.