Bruv, you could just say what you mean. It's obvious that the lander looks flimsy. Are the joints welded to some insane specification; is the chassis effectively immune to any sort of shocks? It's not hard to avoid stupid internet name-calling.
It doesn't look flimsy at all. Some people love to claim it to use it as an argument for their denial of the moon landings but that's just circular reasoning.
Have you ever seen a full picture of it or one without the thermal blankets? It's huge and massive. It's made from aluminum and titanium.
If you cannot explain what you mean then you are an ignorant idiot.
Bruv, you could just say what you mean. It's obvious that the lander looks flimsy. Are the joints welded to some insane specification; is the chassis effectively immune to any sort of shocks? It's not hard to avoid stupid internet name-calling.
It doesn't look flimsy at all. Some people love to claim it to use it as an argument for their denial of the moon landings but that's just circular reasoning.
Have you ever seen a full picture of it or one without the thermal blankets? It's huge and massive. It's made from aluminum and titanium.
I'd like to have whatever you're smoking, please.
Now you see how useless an argument is that is based on a subjective assumption.
"It looks flimsy to me therefore the moon landing is fake".
You think that this is a convincing argument?
You're free to believe that.