ROE V. WADE OVERTURNED
(twitter.com)
Comments (34)
sorted by:
dont care about literally ANYTHING ELSE about what trump did. he got 3 conservative judges on the supreme court. do NOT care about ANYTHING ELSE. and he packed the lower courts too. that's IT.
do NOT care about any other arguments LOL
I do care, but I'm going to give Trump credit for this, God used him for this imho.
Right and wrong isn’t really important. The ramifications of this will be immense
The right is just as retarded as the left, imagine thinking that the government never engages in psyops and manipulations targeted specifically at you, imagine thinking the only trickery tactics are the ones that work on left but didn't work on you, that is the level of retardation you can find here
Are you talking about me or the gaggle of posters on here?
Watch the blue hair mob freak out
Mostly peaceful coping and seething incoming.
LEFTISTS ARE VERY PEACEFUL PEOPLE!
Power goes back to the states to regulate as they will. States are divided about 2/3 pro-life and 1/3 pro-death.
Could this be due to the possibility of an inevitable, precipitous drop in population?
Ya think?
And with this, a major precedent for the right to bodily autonomy is gone. Vaccine mandates incoming the moment Biden's so called next pandemic hits.
State and local mandates are here, but there's no federal mandate despite their best efforts.
Like every possible avenue available.
Abortion was never a precedent for bodily autonomy. Second, there are 2 bodies involved with an abortion, not one.
That was litterly the argument. This is a loss
Except for the baby, you'd suppose.
RvW used bodily autonomy as the justification for abortion protection. The courts saw it as one body.
No, they didn't. They made the decision of Roe on a right to privacy, not bodily autonomy. In fact, the only SCOTUS decision on vaccine mandates, was that the poor fellow had to take the shot or pay a fine. The guy paid the $5 fine and walked.
Privacy/autonomy are basically the same thing in this context.
No, they are not, when the constitutional basis for the decisions are miles apart.
Roe was decided though the substantive due process clause of the 14th amendment as a mechanism. The Court at the time said that a right to privacy existed in the constitution, though it doesn't exist in any amendment or text of the thing. This made up right to privacy was what they used to decide Roe.
The Supreme Court in the vaccine mandate case (Jacobson in 1905), which has never been overturned, and which was decided upon decades prior to Roe, the Court ruled that under the state's "police power" it can force you to get an injection against your will.
Now, rhetorically, you may be correct, but as a matter of law and case precedent, you're wrong.
https://verdict.justia.com/2020/11/24/mandatory-vaccination-and-the-future-of-abortion-rights
Sounds very likely (to me) that ditching roe v wade would be the first step in repealing these protections. The author even goes on to state it, what a pretentious asshole.
How do these people sleep at night having sold their souls for a few dollars. Like a baby prolly.
Related, as a matter of precedent, the Court has never overruled their decision that the government has the power to forcibly sterilize you. This was from Buck vs Bell.
The argument about when life begins hasn't been settled.
Scietifically, it's a human being. Just not a fully developed one, just as a baby isn't fully developed either.
The question is when is "personhood".
Just a reminder that abortion will remain legal in many states, and the only way to be bothered by this is to be so consumed by evil that you believe babies need to be murdered everywhere continuously.
Stay mad lefties
Hoe's mad
What the hell is "reproductive freedom" supposed to mean?
I was thinking about this yesterday - the definition seems to be nearly the exact opposite of what those two words mean together in a sentence. Real life newspeak if you ask me.
This shouldn't be political. Women are half the population, and regardless of their party woman's reproductive health just took a serious blow right in the middle of the, " birthing people" bullshit.
Are you people blind?
More unwanted children gives the government a “reason” to create more wards of the state and indoctrinate them. 1-2 generations and it’s over
Pro-life/death/choice does not really matter in the end. People can’t afford children due to the price manipulations so inevitable they become property of the state which in its current status quo should not be in charge of anything
Who’s going to take care of all the unwanted babies? The government?
You
Maybe the gov can take custody and collect them all on farms