From page 28: “Reports of adverse reactions to counterfeit products, increased levels of counterfeiting, or unsafe COVID-19 vaccines could materially affect public confidence in our COVID-19 vaccine or other product candidates. It is possible that adverse events caused by unsafe counterfeit vaccines will mistakenly be attributed to our COVID-19 vaccine. In addition, thefts of inventory at warehouses, plants or while in-transit, which are subsequently improperly stored and which are sold through unauthorized channels could adversely impact patient safety, our reputation, and our business.“
I would say that the threat of counterfeit products would indeed cause risks. You don't agree?
Do you all dig deeper on anything or do you just accept whatever confirms your bias that comes your way? Literally, this is just from google "counterfeit COVID vaccines."
Who do you think you are fooling? You aren't fooling me or anyone else with at least half a brain.
Shirk liability. “You volunteered for an experimental medical procedure, so you implicitly knew the risks” — then they’ll deny the claims as the deaths would be akin to suicide.
No, every drug has the potential for previously unknown side effects or severity not demonstrated in trials cropping up when the vaccine or drug is administered to the population generally. This isn't anything new.
The die-offs are already starting to happen. Ask anyone around you and there is a good chance they will tell you there has been a curious increase in the numbers of (sudden or strange) deaths this year in their social groups and families.
I've asked lots of people. They all say that they and everyone else they know are fine. I think they are lying, but I don't have any evidence either way. All I can do is hope they all die soon and quietly.... I'm trying to read.
I've already schooled you on VAERS, so now you're just lying about it. VAERS itself says that the data there might not be accurate. You don't know if any of those reports have been validated.
You don’t like databases of reports from private people, not Big Pharma sponsored, who have evidence of vaccine injuries and death? And those reports are governed under 18 USC 1001, which is punishable by fine and imprisonment for false reporting? That’s not good enough for you? What about all cause mortality increasing? Anecdotal evidence of people dying or having adverse reactions on camera after the jab? World class athletes falling over or dying during games? All the research showing VAIDs, myocarditis, hepatitis, being associated with repeated vaccination?
What, do you need someone to drop dead right on front of you to believe that die off is happening?
This doesn't say what you seem to think it says. Nowhere does it say the vaccine is unsafe. All of these issues are already known issues and they have to disclose them to shareholders.
That simply means you have terrible reading comprehension, a typical trait of a vax shill. Again, feel free to review all of the documents here to catch up: https://phmpt.org/
The number of reports alone cannot be interpreted as evidence of a causal association between a vaccine and an adverse event, or as evidence about the existence, severity, frequency, or rates of problems associated with vaccines.
How am I misreading that?
Your link has nothing to do with the fact that VAERS data cannot be interpreted as evidence of a causal association between a vaccine and an adverse event.
I've gone down a lot of rabbit holes with the anti-vaxxer crowd. I'm not wasting my time with this. Cite a document that you think is particularly important, or even the top 10 and I'll read them. Otherwise, this is a wild goose chase. I actually opened a few of the PDFs. I see nothing noteworthy so far.
It's like telling people to look at VAERs. I doubt anybody here has actually gone to VAERS and looked at it. And if they have, unless they spent quite a long time with the dataset, there isn't much one could say about it.
Get wrecked they just admitted their jabs are dangerous and useless:
https://investors.biontech.de/node/11931/html#ic5e06a05a31d4c4491031d3208cef8c2_2806
Wait a minute, where’s GnarlyToad?
I thought your math skillz said the vax was safe and effective? Where you at, you little fucker?
What do you think is in this that wasn't already known? Where does it say the vaccine isn't safe?
Lol...
From page 28: “Reports of adverse reactions to counterfeit products, increased levels of counterfeiting, or unsafe COVID-19 vaccines could materially affect public confidence in our COVID-19 vaccine or other product candidates. It is possible that adverse events caused by unsafe counterfeit vaccines will mistakenly be attributed to our COVID-19 vaccine. In addition, thefts of inventory at warehouses, plants or while in-transit, which are subsequently improperly stored and which are sold through unauthorized channels could adversely impact patient safety, our reputation, and our business.“
They sound like conspiracy theorists.
When two conspiracies collide: the Vax and Supply chain issues
I would say that the threat of counterfeit products would indeed cause risks. You don't agree?
Do you all dig deeper on anything or do you just accept whatever confirms your bias that comes your way? Literally, this is just from google "counterfeit COVID vaccines."
Who do you think you are fooling? You aren't fooling me or anyone else with at least half a brain.
British Medical Journal: Fake COVID-19 vaccinations in Africa
Fake covid vaccines boost the black market for counterfeit medicines
STAT Fake, substandard vaccines and medicines spell trouble for controlling Covid-19
FDA:
Beware of Fraudulent Coronavirus Tests, Vaccines and Treatments
World Economic Forum:
The COVID vaccine market is worth at least $150 billion. Can we stop it being flooded with fakes?
I’d rather take my chances with a fake.
The insurance companies are going to get involved.
What do you suppose they'll try to do?
Shirk liability. “You volunteered for an experimental medical procedure, so you implicitly knew the risks” — then they’ll deny the claims as the deaths would be akin to suicide.
Yep, and the family survivors would need to medically 'prove' that the death was not cause by the clot shot.
Insurance loves to deny claims. They'll probably sue for insurance fraud, because they've been paying out for all the gas lighting of symptoms.
All the highlights needed to do USB the sentence.
&
These are things that were pointed out years ago., and were called misinformation.
No, every drug has the potential for previously unknown side effects or severity not demonstrated in trials cropping up when the vaccine or drug is administered to the population generally. This isn't anything new.
This is new. This is the largest drug trial so far in history.
No refunds, only upgrades
What is this from? Is it an annual report? False information in an annual report is a big deal, so they need to be careful.
Yeah- it's their most recent annual report.
Pfizer?
I urge Americans to write that company and request a copy. It is my understanding that they are required to send one.
Not to worry, they'll get "bailed out" and the public get's shafted with injections forever.
Murder. Trials. First.
I can't wait for the mass die-offs..... Soon. Probably in about two more weeks.
The die-offs are already starting to happen. Ask anyone around you and there is a good chance they will tell you there has been a curious increase in the numbers of (sudden or strange) deaths this year in their social groups and families.
Whether it will be a "mass" die-off?
Shrugs
I've asked lots of people. They all say that they and everyone else they know are fine. I think they are lying, but I don't have any evidence either way. All I can do is hope they all die soon and quietly.... I'm trying to read.
Small sample size overall but it’s definitely taking place.
Do you have any hard evidence to base this on?
Of...the die off? Injuries? Yes, look at VAERS.
I've already schooled you on VAERS, so now you're just lying about it. VAERS itself says that the data there might not be accurate. You don't know if any of those reports have been validated.
I just schooled your ass, actually.
He's a retard who thinks Fauci made up dinosaurs in order to sell films.
So "no", then?
Enjoy that vaccine
You don’t like databases of reports from private people, not Big Pharma sponsored, who have evidence of vaccine injuries and death? And those reports are governed under 18 USC 1001, which is punishable by fine and imprisonment for false reporting? That’s not good enough for you? What about all cause mortality increasing? Anecdotal evidence of people dying or having adverse reactions on camera after the jab? World class athletes falling over or dying during games? All the research showing VAIDs, myocarditis, hepatitis, being associated with repeated vaccination?
What, do you need someone to drop dead right on front of you to believe that die off is happening?
Can you guess what I'll say about this?
This doesn't say what you seem to think it says. Nowhere does it say the vaccine is unsafe. All of these issues are already known issues and they have to disclose them to shareholders.
That simply means you have terrible reading comprehension, a typical trait of a vax shill. Again, feel free to review all of the documents here to catch up: https://phmpt.org/
What did I read wrong? It's pretty easy reading:
How am I misreading that?
Your link has nothing to do with the fact that VAERS data cannot be interpreted as evidence of a causal association between a vaccine and an adverse event.
I've gone down a lot of rabbit holes with the anti-vaxxer crowd. I'm not wasting my time with this. Cite a document that you think is particularly important, or even the top 10 and I'll read them. Otherwise, this is a wild goose chase. I actually opened a few of the PDFs. I see nothing noteworthy so far.
It's like telling people to look at VAERs. I doubt anybody here has actually gone to VAERS and looked at it. And if they have, unless they spent quite a long time with the dataset, there isn't much one could say about it.
Research the trial links and get back to me.