Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

86
That awkward moment when vaccine shills realize the manufacturers have just started warning investors that their vaccines are neither safe nor effective.... (media.conspiracies.win)
posted 3 years ago by KiloRomeo 3 years ago by KiloRomeo +86 / -0
61 comments download share
61 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (61)
sorted by:
▲ 2 ▼
– Dorktron4Runner 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

That simply means you have terrible reading comprehension, a typical trait of a vax shill. Again, feel free to review all of the documents here to catch up: https://phmpt.org/

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -2 ▼
– GnarlyToad -2 points 3 years ago +1 / -3

What did I read wrong? It's pretty easy reading:

The number of reports alone cannot be interpreted as evidence of a causal association between a vaccine and an adverse event, or as evidence about the existence, severity, frequency, or rates of problems associated with vaccines.

How am I misreading that?

Your link has nothing to do with the fact that VAERS data cannot be interpreted as evidence of a causal association between a vaccine and an adverse event.

I've gone down a lot of rabbit holes with the anti-vaxxer crowd. I'm not wasting my time with this. Cite a document that you think is particularly important, or even the top 10 and I'll read them. Otherwise, this is a wild goose chase. I actually opened a few of the PDFs. I see nothing noteworthy so far.

It's like telling people to look at VAERs. I doubt anybody here has actually gone to VAERS and looked at it. And if they have, unless they spent quite a long time with the dataset, there isn't much one could say about it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Dorktron4Runner 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Research the trial links and get back to me.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - 9slbq (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy