The idea I'm attempting to propose is that this is now becoming you don't have a choice for your body.
The idea of my body my choice was nice but then why did you have sex?
We can slowly see the conundrum.
I do believe in my body my choice. Sex can result in grossness from a humanbeing like bacteria and other grossness.
I want to know at this point how much the government should have control over your actions or your body. I do think to some certain extent it should but, if my government is corrupt, I have no ability to correct it other then "voting". I could take the violence route but I am getting monitored for that.
I am wondering why roe v wade right now. Specifically after the whole covid fiasco.
Though it feels nice to rub in the faces of those who believed in "my body my choice
I however think there is malicious ideas behind it.
I'd propose the idea that we preach equality for different people. This idea has worked well for me recently based off of one experiment. The word equality gets their emotions going.
your incoherent ramblings sound like they were written by a bot
That's funny because I like to exchange information shortly. I could write a paragraph for every idea but it's better to do it in sentences. However, I am well adept at writing in paragraphs. I can show you quickly like I am now.
Which point of my statement didn't you understand regarding how much the government should have control over your body? I was purposefully cryptic so the bots don't understand. It should've been easy for you.
And now you're calling me a bot. I don't have enough intelligence to be a bot. I have enough intelligence to barely call you out for calling me out. I am not expressing emotions either.
Not all bots are 'smart' in fact most are just verbose....like your post.
You can check my postings. I have begun to stumble on my words. I can barely express my ideas to you. It's a shame really. I do like your accusations though.
Glad to know it’s not just me.
Brevity is the art of wit.
The soul of wit... of which you are clearly lacking.
I grow because of people like you. This topic is heavily shilled.
How much control should the government have over your actions. And how much should you be blamed for your decisions?
Go drink more snake venom and exercise those demons, Christsuck.
Female detected.
Are men and women equal?
Shouldn't the government have control over your body like they do over a man?
Don't believe in equality do you. If I was a bigot, I'd have you banned like plenty of us were in r/conspiracy.
Lies. No women would be caught dead anywhere near you or your future corpse. Open another bottle.
Censorship is for the weak. You are weak.
Mmm, I do believe in Jesus and the bible. The prevailing demon in my life is liquor. I don't understand why you have to insult me though.
Because you're a total gimp. Please drink yourself to death. Thanks.
yeah this is what a bot says about abortion based on its searches of the internet
"I am wondering why roe v wade right now. Specifically after the whole covid fiasco."
The decision was leaked to mobilize the Dems prior to the election. But the pro-life movement has pushed and pushed and pushed, at the state and local level, in GOP primaries to get pro-life candidates elected, for 50 years (since Roe in 1973). They got the strongest pro-life president ever in Trump, who appointed 3 Federalist Society justices who, while namby-pamby on a host of issues, the Federalist Society is strongly pro-life.
It wasn't a coincidence, but the result of hard work.
Likewise, since the 1960s the left did the same for gay marriage. Obergerfell was not an accident, but a result of their hard work doing the same as the pro-life crowd.
obergerfell reminds me slightly of this, done in 2015, roles up conservatives, trump wins a year later. this abortion ending one will rule up liberals, maybe to help them win midterm elections.
Seems weird, conservative justices want to help dems and liberal justices helped trump? It's one party and they want support to be 50-50%.
I don't think this is conservative justices wanting to help Dems win midterms. The Court can only decide cases put before it, and they have zero control over the timing of when they do. You'd have to say they planned this out almost two years ago when they voted to grant cert to hear it. And in America, there are always elections every two years.
Because Evolution says life was a mistake, the comet fucked a blackhole birthing the milky way.
They didn't choose to get pregnant. It was a mistake. Contraception was a choice. But birth is blame. It happened and no responsibility for it. It's evolution's fault. Better devolve, quickly, climate change demands it.
Surely life is choice and abortion is blame for having a life choice. It's somebody else fault they're girls. Why do they even get pregnant. It's better not too. Evolution.
Not that it matters. There's no convincing anybody of the impact of mistakes. Because mistakes are blameless. They were mistaken.
But that impact has been critical to our present societies. Look at them. Tell me it hasn't had a much deeper run off. Inflation, cost of living, general services. The population simply services it makes more debt to turn its economy. Services importing, inflating, filling any drops with increasing immigration, and offshore investment as the costs keep rising more. Look at home ownership, lowest stats in history. Debt highest. Inflation skyrocketing. Opportunity are you nuts. More careers haven't been created, less is that fact. Matrimony lasting the lowest.
Of course there are victims too. But they aren't proportional to it.
Neither side has it right, in my opinion.
For weeks after conception, the fetus really is just a clump of cells, not much different from an unfertilized egg or a sperm cell. A woman should absolutely be free to abort it, with the only concern being the medical and emotional toll it takes on her. Sure, it's a sign of being irresponsible if she does it for most other reasons than for example if she was raped - but as an adult that is her problem.
At some point neurons begin to form and link up, when that's gone on for long enough, the fetus becomes able to feel pain and must be said to have some level of consciousness. I don't know exactly when this is, and believe nobody really does. It could be 7 weeks, or it could be 15, but it's a question that ultimately has an answer. After that the fetus should have human rights, and it's no longer an abortion but a killing. Sometimes it might not be unethical to kill it, for example to save the life of the mother, but it would then be the same kind of decision as being in a falling plane with two people and one parachute.
Every parent should be allowed to terminate any child they created at any time for any reason.
But you shouldn't be allowed to contract a hitman. Handle your own business, don't outsource your evil.
Your body, your choice, your coathanger in your bathroom.
This is some retarded babbling nonsense.
i wish OP had been aborted and it looks like there is still time to get that done...
You just insulted me and didn't respond to any of it. The prevailing idea was regarding how much control should the government have over your body? I think some. And this roe v wade thing coming now is just what I had behind the idea, regarding malicious intent.
I think I'm over the target.
I'm not going to engage with your questions at all. I'm just here to make fun of you.
Oh good. I like to be funny.
Bots aren't funny.
I've entertained you enough to give me a few responses. You've responded a lot to me actually.
Yes, I find you entertaining. Like watching a train wreck in slow-mo...
How do you feel about abortions in case of rape or medical issues?
How do you feel about infant dismemberment ?
Pretty bad.
So, can you answer the question?
I will not blindly validate abortion in cases of rape or medical issues. As per my question, abortion violently dismembers a human being simply because of the sins of another human being. Abortion goes against the natural instinct of motherhood, and continuation of humanity, and as such it is evil.
That being said, abortion is an issue that highlights the pitfalls and errors of societal structure. I can think of few other questions that bring light to the problems of society structure than abortion.
So you want to make the decision about whether or not a woman can have an abortion?
Or who should be able to make that ecision?
92% of abortions are elective. 7% are for economic reasons. 99% are not medically necessary nor related to rape.
That does not answer my question.
Your question is attempting to create a false equivalence and therefore should be dismissed
It definitely has on the matter of percentages.
Let me ask you. Should women be equal to men?
If that were the case then. Shouldn't we be able to discuss on how we conduct our behaviors?
What do you mean? When it comes to rights? Of course.
Then if that's the case, should a woman abandon the child despite having sex? There's plenty of cases where women just abandon a child.
Unfortunately though, lots of men will trick a women so then we should be sympathetic just because a woman got tricked?
Should a woman take responsibility for their actions? And should men just get drafted?
So, you can not or do not want to answer the question.
Why am I not surprised.
I answered your question. You're surprised by my answer because you didn't understand?
He answered your Question by expanding on the original Question.
What did you expect, when asking to define a Question?
I suppose, if you kill a baby that was the product of rape, you'd have two victims instead of one
So, what is the verdict then? Forbid it?
Is it an acceptable trade-off that an innocent human being dies due to the possible mental health issues of a woman burdened with the child of rape that she need not even raise? One is a temporary issue, the mental health, while the death of the child is permanent. Think of it as the "suicide is the permanent solution to a temporary problem" calculus. So yes, abortion in cases of rape should be against the law.
Note, in good faith, this presumes that it's not "regret rape" and that the woman doesn't take a morning after pill, which would make it worse to kill a baby.
The tricky moral issues are things like women who find out they have cancer while pregnant, or an ectopic pregnancy that may kill her.
My title was that I don't always believe in abortion. I do think they can be considered just in those certain circumstances.
Do you believe that the government should regulate abortions?
Depends on why and how long the term of delivery date is.
What are your ideas regarding this?
Tell me first who should be authorized to make the decision if a woman can have an abortion.
Depends on the situation. Which situation do you have in mind?
Are we talking about a late term abortion?
Did she have consensual sex to bring that baby to her womb?
Then the woman has already decided on many factors.
Whatever scenario you can imagine.
Does somebody have authority over their body? If they do then, do they have consequences for their actions?
My scenario is this for a woman. If you cannot afford to raise a child, don't have sex.
have to be outlawed too or women will make fake rape accusations