Comments (14)
sorted by:
3
KiloRomeo 3 points ago +3 / -0

Okay I’ll play. The map part is fun. Say we accommodate the mechanics and the map stuff, how do we explain:

  • visible light being reflected from xray emissions through the earth
  • light reflecting off of earth esp w/day/night cycle
  • visible light being protected from moon
3
Poiuytrew 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nice find. Any day there's a theory we haven't heard before is a good day.

3
Izaritos 3 points ago +3 / -0

This theory intrigues me to no end honestly.

2
alltheleavesarebrown 2 points ago +2 / -0

Its a snapshot of the full earth land beyond taken when the moon arrived.

Original theory here.

#8 And 9

https://archive.org/details/hidden-history-of-earth

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +2 / -1

The first vid mentions where to go at the "crossroads"; then suggests to seek within the lost past and the uncertainty of future. Instead of falling for that suggest rabbit-hole; why not reconsider the implication of "crossroads"? What does a road represent? From/to aka beginning towards end; which implies movement. What then does "at the crossroads" imply? Having choice within movement.

Crossroads represents allegory for free will of choice, and choice is defined as a reaction to balance within motion. We don't have to consent to the suggested choices at the crossroad...we each represent the "cross" of choice within the balance of the "road".

The end of the vid suggests that "this story cannot be told linear"...now back to the crossroad...the road (flow) represent the linear narrative for the cross (choice of form) within; while the cross represents evaluation of direction by choice within predefined direction.

-1
PenisBanana -1 points ago +1 / -2

It's a list of Flat-Earth-Psyop materials.

1
TheAwakened 1 point ago +1 / -0

Kek this is all true

1
no_ez 1 point ago +2 / -1

The moon is an artificial satellite and plays some part in the reincarnation process.

0
Graphenium 0 points ago +2 / -2

The first person I saw post about this was u/free-will-of-choice

Still hard to wrap my head around... what would exist that could be tested, and would be unique to this paradigm? Maybe some kind of high powered laser shot into the sky, then you look for the complementary light in the “projection”?

Cool idea for sure, and I definitely think there’s something to the “electric universe” theory, which this kind of ties into

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +3 / -1

Maybe some kind of high powered laser shot into the sky, then you look for the complementary light in the “projection”?

If it represents our reflection; then wouldn't the light spectrum we perceive already represent the highest powered visual light there is?

“electric universe”

A contradiction in terms...if universe (whole aka ALL); then why electric without magnetic? You represent the ONE within that is being suggested an ALL (universe) without balance (electric/magnetic)...yet that suggestion aims at your free will of choice; which is defined as the reaction to balance.

-1
Graphenium -1 points ago +1 / -2

If it represents our reflection; then wouldn't the light spectrum we perceive already represent the highest powered visual light there is?

Sure, but you’d probably see a big flashlight strapped to your forehead (in a mirror). And if you had just strapped a flashlight to your forehead, that would go some ways to proving that the mirror actually is a reflection as opposed to some other explanation

A contradiction in terms...if universe (whole aka ALL); then why electric without magnetic?

Hey don’t ask me, I didn’t come up with the name! Besides, even EM is itself a limited paradigm... hit me with that ToE!

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

flashlight...mirror

Aka using light to cause change within reflection. Now consider being form within flow; which represents a) being within constant change and b) within the constant change that causes light (velocity meets resistance)? So perceiving a constantly changing light-source; while using change of light to question the perceived.

Adding to this...ALL represents the fully functioning system; ONE the growth potential of comprehension within, so the limitation is always within understanding; not within what's offered to perception. Next add the flat-earth horizon issue to it aka distance changes perspective (not of what one perceives; but how one comprehends it).

DISTANCE, noun [Latin , to stand apart; to stand.] - "an interval or space between two objects; the length of the shortest line which intervenes between two things that are separate"

Now what are the implications "to stand" for form within flow, and what does "space in-between" imply for ALL representing ONE in energy?

Let me use a parasite sleight of hand from the suggested idol "Kenny Rogers"...

"Islands in the stream...That is what we are" - (form within flow)

"No one in between...How can we be wrong" - (ALL is ONE and no truth vs false)

explanation

EXPLANA'TION, noun [Latin explanatio.] - "the sense given by an expounder or interpreter". Does flow explains form or does flow cause form; which becomes self explanatory if chosen to adhere to by form?

Hey don’t ask me

The most effective vetting tool for suggestion...a question. Why? It puts responsibility over choice to the test. Does flow question form? QUESTION, noun [Latin quaestio. See Quest.] + QUEST, noun [Latin quaero, quaestus.] - "the act of seeking" aka the choice of want over need.

What does ONE seek within ALL offered? Could this be a temptation? Let's check what Kenny has to say...

"Sail away with me...To another world" (suggestion of temptation)

"Everything is nothing...If you got no one" (ALL ignored by ONE for suggestions by another ONE)

I didn’t come up with the name!

Do you have responsibility over choice within balance, and what does the choice to suggest names to the choice of others imply for that responsibility to balance? The suggested idol "electric universe" precedes any suggested meanings afterwards, and we are the ones suggesting it to each other in ignorance of the deliberate contradiction in terms.

To make it easier to spot contradicting terms...TERM, noun [Latin terminus, a limit or boundary.]...balance represents the boundary for choice aka flow for form and flow doesn't suggest us terms; it demands us to react to them. Every suggested word as idolized meaning contradicts communication of inspiration by movement.

EM is itself a limited paradigm

We represent the limited reaction within the unlimited offer and so any PARADIGM, noun [Gr. example, to show.] represents an expression of that.

hit me with that ToE!

The trick is to bend the foot before impact to not hit with the toe...

0
PenisBanana 0 points ago +1 / -1

Fuck off. u/free-will-of-choice is a bot and you know it, you fag.

-2
Graphenium -2 points ago +1 / -3

Cool story handshake, how does it feel to be so wrong and also such a faggot?