The Moon is the...Earth? Nice diversion amidst military coups and hoax plandemics.
(boards.4channel.org)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (14)
sorted by:
Sure, but you’d probably see a big flashlight strapped to your forehead (in a mirror). And if you had just strapped a flashlight to your forehead, that would go some ways to proving that the mirror actually is a reflection as opposed to some other explanation
Hey don’t ask me, I didn’t come up with the name! Besides, even EM is itself a limited paradigm... hit me with that ToE!
Aka using light to cause change within reflection. Now consider being form within flow; which represents a) being within constant change and b) within the constant change that causes light (velocity meets resistance)? So perceiving a constantly changing light-source; while using change of light to question the perceived.
Adding to this...ALL represents the fully functioning system; ONE the growth potential of comprehension within, so the limitation is always within understanding; not within what's offered to perception. Next add the flat-earth horizon issue to it aka distance changes perspective (not of what one perceives; but how one comprehends it).
DISTANCE, noun [Latin , to stand apart; to stand.] - "an interval or space between two objects; the length of the shortest line which intervenes between two things that are separate"
Now what are the implications "to stand" for form within flow, and what does "space in-between" imply for ALL representing ONE in energy?
Let me use a parasite sleight of hand from the suggested idol "Kenny Rogers"...
"Islands in the stream...That is what we are" - (form within flow)
"No one in between...How can we be wrong" - (ALL is ONE and no truth vs false)
EXPLANA'TION, noun [Latin explanatio.] - "the sense given by an expounder or interpreter". Does flow explains form or does flow cause form; which becomes self explanatory if chosen to adhere to by form?
The most effective vetting tool for suggestion...a question. Why? It puts responsibility over choice to the test. Does flow question form? QUESTION, noun [Latin quaestio. See Quest.] + QUEST, noun [Latin quaero, quaestus.] - "the act of seeking" aka the choice of want over need.
What does ONE seek within ALL offered? Could this be a temptation? Let's check what Kenny has to say...
"Sail away with me...To another world" (suggestion of temptation)
"Everything is nothing...If you got no one" (ALL ignored by ONE for suggestions by another ONE)
Do you have responsibility over choice within balance, and what does the choice to suggest names to the choice of others imply for that responsibility to balance? The suggested idol "electric universe" precedes any suggested meanings afterwards, and we are the ones suggesting it to each other in ignorance of the deliberate contradiction in terms.
To make it easier to spot contradicting terms...TERM, noun [Latin terminus, a limit or boundary.]...balance represents the boundary for choice aka flow for form and flow doesn't suggest us terms; it demands us to react to them. Every suggested word as idolized meaning contradicts communication of inspiration by movement.
We represent the limited reaction within the unlimited offer and so any PARADIGM, noun [Gr. example, to show.] represents an expression of that.
The trick is to bend the foot before impact to not hit with the toe...