I haver personally met Dr Woods years ago. She is for real. She is not a shill, a psyop, a plant or a moron.
She is a classic slightly autistic brilliant mind who is only interested in the truth and who's personality doesn't allow her to let go until she has exhausted all possibilities.
Whether she was completely right on "directed energy weapons" I can't say, but the energy, pyroclastic cloud, burning anomalies and other forensic evidence paint a strong case.
Dr Woods book, "Where Did The Towers Go?" is linked (in scanned PDF format) in our wiki. There's no official ebook version, someone who owned a copy did that. I've read it and highly recommend it. Of all the theories about what happened on 9/11, Woods "theory" seems to me to be the only based, in an open minded way, on the totality of documentation available.
I say "theory" because she's careful to only point out the evidence. She doesn't know for sure how it was done, but is fairly confident as to what was done, if that makes sense.
Wood is a controversial figure in conspiracy circles. Often claimed to be "controlled opposition" by followers of AE911Truth, Richard Gage, Steven Jones et al. She has been shouted down in recent years by that crowd, which is a shame. Steven Jones is in fact a shill, who has tried to steer the Truth movement towards the thermite theory. Long before 9/11, he was intrinsic in getting LENR research (low energy nuclear reaction) defunded and condemned as not worth researching. He did this by staging a press conference and a vote, not by demonstrating it was worthless, and he misrepresented the research and results of many researchers. Basically he's a spook trying to steer people away from "zero point" energy, the same field of energy generation that was involved in the destruction of the WTC.
It's all pretty complicated and actively suppressed. Mentioning her on reddit was always a compete shitshow of "reeee" and downvotes.
Axo is light years ahead of me on this stuff, I'm playing catch-up for sure, but here are my 2 cents: Breakaway Civilization with advanced tech seems to be the case, and the more people who are aware of it and looking into it the better. It's important to preserve and pass on what has already been discovered, so no one is starting from scratch because they are decades ahead of us. I've been focused on collecting and downloading masses of stuff related to all this for the past yearish and I am currently in the process of organizing it into a proper digital library for ease of reference and propagation. (I have a feeling such infos are going to become more difficult to find and share in the near future)
Mind control: I don't believe they have any more practical, direct forms of mass mind control than controlling the MSM, school/college education and the world of scientific research. I might be wrong though. The "indirect" approach is constantly developing, being worked on to make it more comprehensive. Restricting freedom of expression on the internet is clearly an important project at the moment.
I don't know what else to say, really. It's a black pill for sure.
How do we defend against DEW
I don't know, but I don't think they are straightforward or easy to use. Running away is probably going to be the best option for most. That's why knowing about them is the most essential thing. They're not like guns or bombs, they seem to take time to work. I believe they could have been working on the buildings even before the "plane" explosions. I think Wood alludes to that in her book somewhere. Then there are the telltale signs she points out that they were working on the buildings, that of course no one knew to look for before, but now could be things people can remember to look out for. in the case of the Cali fires the fact that only some materials were effected and not others. Things don't seem burn the same as normal with DEWs.
By the way the version of Judy wood's book in the wiki is black and white, I just checked. The colour version is better because of the amount of reference images; I have it, but my internet is incredibly slow for uploading at the moment. I'll stick it in a reply here when it's ready.
For comparisons sake, the nukes dropped in WW2 are 76 years old. As far as tech goes, that’s ancient. They’ve done prototype nuclear reactors for airplanes and while shielding was an issue(dead pilots are rather unreliable), using pilotless drones makes things easier. Aircraft carriers are old tech too. But add a nuclear propulsion system to an aircraft carrier in the sky, to launch and resupply unmanned aircraft and you have a nightmare for some. This is just looking at technology we KNOW about and adding the two together.
Now add in tech they haven’t told us anything about. Most cool military tech is skunkworks and black budget and we only get to “know” about it after leaks or accidents. If they didn’t have to disclose anything, normies would have no idea what a stealth bomber or fighter are. The microwave oven most people have in their house is from the Japanese betting on a “death ray” in WW2 and it having very shitty range. Having a chip track everyone is something no one would want, until it’s built into their cellular phone and offers too much confidence to not have and ignore what else it’s doing in the background.
Sadly, the reality of the situation is large scale super weapons are usually of limited use and a huge resource cost. The German super guns were cool and all, but limited in use, huge target for cheap energy aircraft to ruin, required tons of men and resources to move, shoot, and protect. It’s far easier to just shut off the power grid. The elites have their own generators and installations but the normies have no fridges no freezers, no way to charge their electric cars if they were foolish enough to only own electric cars, only local communication, no electrify for water pumping and purification plants, etc. Whole country or even the world goes to shit very fast when the power goes off. And it’s easier to destroy crucial infrastructure and ruin the power grid than it is to move around superweapons silently and without getting caught.
Don’t get me wrong, we CERTAINLY have super weapons. There’s just no real point to having a massive amount of them to the effect of Jon Q Redneck having a direct energy cannon next to his railgun next to his shotgun in the trucks gun rack.
They were blown up from the inside out. I’ll explain.
The towers had weird things going on at the end of August and early September. Construction work ongoing, sounds of drills, cube van trucks unloading gear. There was an Israeli “art project” called ETeam with a tennacy in WTC1, they once lit up multiple floors lights at night spelling ETEAM in the windows proving they had access to multiple floors. http://www.abodia.com/911/B-Thing-Images/E%20Team.png
There are countless civilian reports and news reports of multiple explosions that day before the collapse. “They went boomboomboomboom all the way down”. Media reports of third explosions, planted devices.
The core of the building was were it was strong. The core is where the elevators are. The elevators were being massively “overhauled” just prior by a company called ACE Elevator that gave the cover for wiring. Remember the antenna falling in the roof first? That because they blew the core and it all fell down.
The building was pulverized by the implosion, watch the lateral projections of objects. 212,500yd3 of concrete turned to dust. About 26,500 concrete truck loads turned to dust.
They almost have DEWs now, but that was a total demo job.
I watched the second plane hit live and the towers fall live but I've never considered how weird all that dust was. Obviously I know when a building collapses/is blown up, there is a lot of dust generated but this is very peculiar. And the lack of a huge pile of debris for such large buildings.
It begs the question, why announce to the world you have a DEW by taking out the WTC and make it look like a traditional collapse? Surely that is a statement like "look what we have, don't fuck with us or you'll get a taste of this" in an obvious demonstration of unbelievable, advanced power. Why care about carefully bringing it down in it's footprint? You're taking out some huge buildings and murdering thousands of people. Fuck everyone else right? Unless you had assets nearby your didn't want harmed I guess.
How would you stage a weapon like this? I cannot fathom the power consumption. Could it have been plane borne? If it was some sort of space death ray from a satellite, again, power consumption and surely it would be on the radar of various countries that monitor space stuff?
Why has no one else picked up on the seismic stuff, or the elevated radiation levels I wonder?
They look like det cord explosions to me. It would be easy to install something in the building over a few days to a few months. Putin says he warned the US about the attack, so it's possible that the intelligence agencies knew the targets were the towers or even guided the attacks to the towers and set up the explosives for even more damage. Steel and concrete doesn't just do that minutes after any fire. Those explosions were controlled top to bottom.
We do have directed energy weapons here in California. They test them all the time here. It's probably because we have dry heat so much. The weapons are more easily noticeable in very high outputs. They don't just hit the target; they affect anything in the way, including the air.
"Where Did The Towers Go?" by Judy Wood, color scan, 35mb.
EDIT updated the wiki with higher resolution copy, 50 mbs.
https://rb.gy/2vaafm
I haver personally met Dr Woods years ago. She is for real. She is not a shill, a psyop, a plant or a moron.
She is a classic slightly autistic brilliant mind who is only interested in the truth and who's personality doesn't allow her to let go until she has exhausted all possibilities.
Whether she was completely right on "directed energy weapons" I can't say, but the energy, pyroclastic cloud, burning anomalies and other forensic evidence paint a strong case.
Definitely recommended.
Shes a nut.
Dr Woods book, "Where Did The Towers Go?" is linked (in scanned PDF format) in our wiki. There's no official ebook version, someone who owned a copy did that. I've read it and highly recommend it. Of all the theories about what happened on 9/11, Woods "theory" seems to me to be the only based, in an open minded way, on the totality of documentation available.
I say "theory" because she's careful to only point out the evidence. She doesn't know for sure how it was done, but is fairly confident as to what was done, if that makes sense.
Wood is a controversial figure in conspiracy circles. Often claimed to be "controlled opposition" by followers of AE911Truth, Richard Gage, Steven Jones et al. She has been shouted down in recent years by that crowd, which is a shame. Steven Jones is in fact a shill, who has tried to steer the Truth movement towards the thermite theory. Long before 9/11, he was intrinsic in getting LENR research (low energy nuclear reaction) defunded and condemned as not worth researching. He did this by staging a press conference and a vote, not by demonstrating it was worthless, and he misrepresented the research and results of many researchers. Basically he's a spook trying to steer people away from "zero point" energy, the same field of energy generation that was involved in the destruction of the WTC.
It's all pretty complicated and actively suppressed. Mentioning her on reddit was always a compete shitshow of "reeee" and downvotes.
Axo is light years ahead of me on this stuff, I'm playing catch-up for sure, but here are my 2 cents: Breakaway Civilization with advanced tech seems to be the case, and the more people who are aware of it and looking into it the better. It's important to preserve and pass on what has already been discovered, so no one is starting from scratch because they are decades ahead of us. I've been focused on collecting and downloading masses of stuff related to all this for the past yearish and I am currently in the process of organizing it into a proper digital library for ease of reference and propagation. (I have a feeling such infos are going to become more difficult to find and share in the near future)
Mind control: I don't believe they have any more practical, direct forms of mass mind control than controlling the MSM, school/college education and the world of scientific research. I might be wrong though. The "indirect" approach is constantly developing, being worked on to make it more comprehensive. Restricting freedom of expression on the internet is clearly an important project at the moment.
I don't know what else to say, really. It's a black pill for sure.
I don't know, but I don't think they are straightforward or easy to use. Running away is probably going to be the best option for most. That's why knowing about them is the most essential thing. They're not like guns or bombs, they seem to take time to work. I believe they could have been working on the buildings even before the "plane" explosions. I think Wood alludes to that in her book somewhere. Then there are the telltale signs she points out that they were working on the buildings, that of course no one knew to look for before, but now could be things people can remember to look out for. in the case of the Cali fires the fact that only some materials were effected and not others. Things don't seem burn the same as normal with DEWs.
By the way the version of Judy wood's book in the wiki is black and white, I just checked. The colour version is better because of the amount of reference images; I have it, but my internet is incredibly slow for uploading at the moment. I'll stick it in a reply here when it's ready.
Line of sight is required. Put earth between the weapon and you.
They still seem pretty afraid of our AR-15s... so maybe not.
Indeed! Trying to explain this and the fires has been difficult. Cheers! Spread the questioning and knowledge.
For comparisons sake, the nukes dropped in WW2 are 76 years old. As far as tech goes, that’s ancient. They’ve done prototype nuclear reactors for airplanes and while shielding was an issue(dead pilots are rather unreliable), using pilotless drones makes things easier. Aircraft carriers are old tech too. But add a nuclear propulsion system to an aircraft carrier in the sky, to launch and resupply unmanned aircraft and you have a nightmare for some. This is just looking at technology we KNOW about and adding the two together.
Now add in tech they haven’t told us anything about. Most cool military tech is skunkworks and black budget and we only get to “know” about it after leaks or accidents. If they didn’t have to disclose anything, normies would have no idea what a stealth bomber or fighter are. The microwave oven most people have in their house is from the Japanese betting on a “death ray” in WW2 and it having very shitty range. Having a chip track everyone is something no one would want, until it’s built into their cellular phone and offers too much confidence to not have and ignore what else it’s doing in the background.
Sadly, the reality of the situation is large scale super weapons are usually of limited use and a huge resource cost. The German super guns were cool and all, but limited in use, huge target for cheap energy aircraft to ruin, required tons of men and resources to move, shoot, and protect. It’s far easier to just shut off the power grid. The elites have their own generators and installations but the normies have no fridges no freezers, no way to charge their electric cars if they were foolish enough to only own electric cars, only local communication, no electrify for water pumping and purification plants, etc. Whole country or even the world goes to shit very fast when the power goes off. And it’s easier to destroy crucial infrastructure and ruin the power grid than it is to move around superweapons silently and without getting caught.
Don’t get me wrong, we CERTAINLY have super weapons. There’s just no real point to having a massive amount of them to the effect of Jon Q Redneck having a direct energy cannon next to his railgun next to his shotgun in the trucks gun rack.
Commenting to watch later
They were blown up from the inside out. I’ll explain.
The towers had weird things going on at the end of August and early September. Construction work ongoing, sounds of drills, cube van trucks unloading gear. There was an Israeli “art project” called ETeam with a tennacy in WTC1, they once lit up multiple floors lights at night spelling ETEAM in the windows proving they had access to multiple floors. http://www.abodia.com/911/B-Thing-Images/E%20Team.png
Another picture shows the “art students” in a room in the tower with boxes and boxes of fuse holders, for linking wires together. Think DetCord. They are also wearing climbing harnesses in the photo. https://www.markdotzler.com/Mark_Dotzler/WTC_Artists_files/student02.jpg
There are countless civilian reports and news reports of multiple explosions that day before the collapse. “They went boomboomboomboom all the way down”. Media reports of third explosions, planted devices.
The core of the building was were it was strong. The core is where the elevators are. The elevators were being massively “overhauled” just prior by a company called ACE Elevator that gave the cover for wiring. Remember the antenna falling in the roof first? That because they blew the core and it all fell down.
The building was pulverized by the implosion, watch the lateral projections of objects. 212,500yd3 of concrete turned to dust. About 26,500 concrete truck loads turned to dust.
They almost have DEWs now, but that was a total demo job.
https://youtu.be/JWLoYeQVogU https://youtu.be/Wq-0JIR38V0
I watched the second plane hit live and the towers fall live but I've never considered how weird all that dust was. Obviously I know when a building collapses/is blown up, there is a lot of dust generated but this is very peculiar. And the lack of a huge pile of debris for such large buildings.
It begs the question, why announce to the world you have a DEW by taking out the WTC and make it look like a traditional collapse? Surely that is a statement like "look what we have, don't fuck with us or you'll get a taste of this" in an obvious demonstration of unbelievable, advanced power. Why care about carefully bringing it down in it's footprint? You're taking out some huge buildings and murdering thousands of people. Fuck everyone else right? Unless you had assets nearby your didn't want harmed I guess.
How would you stage a weapon like this? I cannot fathom the power consumption. Could it have been plane borne? If it was some sort of space death ray from a satellite, again, power consumption and surely it would be on the radar of various countries that monitor space stuff?
Why has no one else picked up on the seismic stuff, or the elevated radiation levels I wonder?
They look like det cord explosions to me. It would be easy to install something in the building over a few days to a few months. Putin says he warned the US about the attack, so it's possible that the intelligence agencies knew the targets were the towers or even guided the attacks to the towers and set up the explosives for even more damage. Steel and concrete doesn't just do that minutes after any fire. Those explosions were controlled top to bottom.
We do have directed energy weapons here in California. They test them all the time here. It's probably because we have dry heat so much. The weapons are more easily noticeable in very high outputs. They don't just hit the target; they affect anything in the way, including the air.
I watched the second plane so ...