113
Comments (84)
sorted by:
10
kodama 10 points ago +12 / -2

This guy knows his stuff.. love all the analogies he uses for why the pcr test is BS .. ive been anti vax for a long time but this video definitely turned me into a straight germ theory denier ..Would be curious to know what to do with this info in light of the mrna shot containing emf emiting "hydrogel" particles..is aiding the body in detoxification all that can be done? I get that this virus is fake but the synthetic spike proteins and the evidence that they are transmissable to non jabbed people seem like a real threat

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-15
DavidColeIntrepid -15 points ago +1 / -16

They're flat earth faggots and you have no idea what you're talking about

8
montanapede 8 points ago +9 / -1

Are you a shill?

5
kodama 5 points ago +6 / -1

A little harsh but youre of course entitled to your opinion. I see no flat earthery here

-6
DavidColeIntrepid -6 points ago +1 / -7

There's no opinion. The video is by (space Busters) flat earthers. They use the same tactics and there are shills using shill tactics here discussing it

9
Blackbeans 9 points ago +9 / -0

If someone believes a banana is yellow and they happen to believe the earth is flat, does that mean the banana is not yellow?

1
icockmyglock 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's not really a good analogy. We all accept and admit that a banana is yellow. No one is debating that its color is actually perceived differently by each individual and through a social construct called 'yellow' we all agree that the color we see when looking at a banana is yellow.

Virology, on the other hand, is a whole science of its own, complex. Most people don't know shit about virology, have not picked up the first book on the topic or read the first article to understand what it is. So there's a huge level of ignorance on the topic and that gives people who shill flat Earth theories a large opportunity to incite their psy-op on others.

Personally, I don't need this guy to tell me I shouldn't trust a relatively unvetted gene therapy pawning itself off as a vaccine being pushed as "good for us" and paid for by a class of people who don't give a shit if most of us die in the streets from exposure.

-7
DavidColeIntrepid -7 points ago +2 / -9

Means you're gay

6
Blackbeans 6 points ago +7 / -1

I'm gay for terrain theory ;)

-5
DavidColeIntrepid -5 points ago +1 / -6

Can you explain it without lying about cell structure and mold growth?

7
Gallemore 7 points ago +13 / -6

I'm sorry, but I just finished the video and this guy is a complete dumbass. I've seen germs with my own eyes, and bacteria and viruses, etc. He is completely wrong about how they don't exist.

The better explanation is that we all get sick, right?

The government just charges us money to get a placebo vaccine historically.

Now, this is a new vaccine that has more of an ability to control cells and they want control + profit.

Occam's razor here people. We've all gotten sick and we all know greedy fucks. Now combine the two and we get our current situation.

8
Esuomyonana 8 points ago +8 / -0

I think one of the most important aspects that science has yet to resolve is the balance between germ theory and terrain theory. These two aspects both contribute to sickness. To say that germ theory reigns supreme is pretty outlandish because we know for a fact that better terrains help prevent the contraction of disease. The health of the organism also helps prevent disease.

The most interesting take of the documentary from my perspective is that cells consist of nearly indestructible organic material. It's like this for all living organisms. Once the cell dies, this organic material waits until it can be in an environment to become a living cell again. He talked about how the bible refers to it as dust.

Another thing, that I took away was that Toxemia, is possibly a significant aspect of disease contraction. How much, that's up for speculation. There's so many interesting things regarding this field, a few contradictions. For example, a significant portion of your body consists of what is known as the virome. The virome essentially helps the cells perform bodily functions. Then there's the fact that most viruses between living organisms aren't contagious. This means that a virus inside of a different organism isn't capable of commandeering a different organisms cell, typically.

I could go on, but there's so much to take away from that documentary.

It appears that people do not want us talking about this, sharing resources. Even on POL, this topic gets moved by the mods.

3
Gallemore 3 points ago +3 / -0

I belive we should always be able to communicate freely. I belive in God, but I root myself in reality until he gives me definite proof. No man knows the hour nor the day...

2
mvrak 2 points ago +2 / -0

Seeing them and knowing what they are doing are different things. For viruses I can't fault the logic. Bacterial infection can still be real, the question is a matter of perspective on what is invading..

2
axolotl_peyotl [S] 2 points ago +6 / -4

you missed the point completely if you're comparing bacteria and viruses. One exists and one doesn't.

COVID doesn't exist. Good luck as you plunge further down the rabbit hole!

2
Gallemore 2 points ago +3 / -1

You're right. I have said that over and over again. Covid is just the cold/flu with a name slapped on it.

-4
DavidColeIntrepid -4 points ago +1 / -5

The only "proof" offered are lies about cell structure and mold spores.

https://web.archive.org/web/20181226012426/https://secretsun.blogspot.com/2010/11/project-blue-beam-exposed.html

And it's hard to take someone seriously when they think bluebeam isnt a complete psyop. Are there any actual UFO nerds here, or just flat earth window lickers?

1
Independenceforever 1 point ago +1 / -0

"seen...with my own eyes... viruses"

Without a microscope? really?

Someone is definitely a dumbass.

Your professors should have taught you about Gregor Mendel, how EVIDENCE and REASON confirm genetics, not mere visual representations from electron microscopes or whatever tool you used.

You didn't "see" them with your own eyes, lol. You used a tool.

To define something as a "virus" you have to prove it infectious, prove it replicates, and prove it isn't just a common cold.

You're missing the entire point: which is a severe skipping of necessary steps of scientific method.

WHAT YOU SEE IS NOT NECESSARILY WHAT IS, AND YOU HAVE TO THEN PROVE WHAT YOU SEE IS WHAT YOU THINK IT IS.

Your post talks nothing of principle. I think you're a liar or a fool.

Did not watch the docs yet. Perhaps teh guy in it is a fool too. We ARE in a middle ages, so you can expect superstitious nonsense to prevail while we gut and retool society.

1
Gallemore 1 point ago +1 / -0

He didn't just refer to viruses. He said germs don't exist. Believe what you want, you aren't going to convince me.

6
Mrexreturns 6 points ago +10 / -4

It's sad because it hardly matters.

I bet all of these fell into deaf ears.

Humanity surrendering its values and becoming extinct is a future and is inevitable.

No amount of warnings or small gatherings of consciousness will change this.

Mark my words, you will need it. Your future generation (If you really think there is one) will need it.

3
Graphenium 3 points ago +7 / -4

u/davidcoleintrepid

Pinging you here so that an actually discussion can take place, in this thread dedicated to discussion, without the baggage of your earlier comments.

Then focus on their claims that "viruses are dead cells" or "mold develops internally"

I don’t think they claim that viruses are dead cells, my understanding of their argument was that when cells in “diseased” tissue (aka tissue suffering toxicosis) die, the body, as part of its homeostatic “clean up operations”, collects this toxic refuse (poisonous substances, and rotting flesh), and bundles it up in what have heretofore been called “viruses”, to aid in flushing it from the body without spreading the waste around and causing further negative effects. This is the thesis of the video, and you will need to actually see their argument in order to have an informed discussion.

Regarding the claims about mold, I think they are just recontextualizing something that everyone acknowledges, which is that “rot” begins inside a dead (cell/animal), from the microflora naturally present which can now reproduce without the restraint normally imposed by a living beings immune system.

0
Mark4-39 0 points ago +4 / -4

Hi fren, I'm not watching the video, but from your description it sounds like they are conflating necrosis/autophagy/apoptosis pathways with viruses. Viruses do exist and can induce cell death, but they do a ton of other cool stuff too.

(Used to be a virologist before I got a job that doesn't pay slave wages lol)

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +5 / -4

Huh well I think you could offer some really interesting insights and help elucidate if the subjects/specifics they advance have any practical or theoretical applications, I hope you check it out when you get a chance.

2
Mark4-39 2 points ago +4 / -2

I'll get around to it eventually. But since I'm your alt now, maybe I've already seen it? 😅

1
Mark4-39 1 point ago +2 / -1

Oof. I got 10 minutes in and couldn't take it anymore. We could spend a year talking about all the reasons he is wrong.

Is there any specific point you found interesting? I'm happy to share my experience working with viruses and cells with you if you'd be into an alternate perspective.

3
Graphenium 3 points ago +3 / -0

Given your expertise, you might actually be able to answer a question that’s been pressing lately:

Are you caught up on the issue of “isolating” SARS CoV2? Especially the conspiracy angle, which is that only blended mixtures of genes have been recovered which get sequenced VIA a schematic of SARS CoV1? That’s covered in depth in the video near the mid point, basically what they’re doing could be done on any genetic sample, because they’re just re-ordering tiny segments into to match the overall pattern (like those portraits made of hundreds of smaller portraits selected by a computer to conform to the programmed color gradient instructions). Basically I’d appreciate your take on the question of “have we isolated this virus?” And the associated concerns.

I really think you should watch the whole thing, the first 10 minutes are like the abstract or the overview, where the video tells you in advance the (shocking, for sure) conclusions that will end up being drawn, but with none of the evidence yet. The topics of 1917 influenza research (and their inability to observe human to human transmission no matter how hard they tried) and also “terrain theory” as it has come to be known, which gets talked about in detail during the end of the doc are particularly interesting to me, but honestly I found myself going from more to less apprehension about the ideas as they were able to show the evidence behind the claims made at the start. Regardless, thanks

3
Mark4-39 3 points ago +3 / -0

So for your question about isolating the virus, the simple answer is we have the tools to do it, but either through incompetence or dastardliness (is that a word?), I doubt that we have. I also think its inconsequential at this point, bc the govt has thrown out every standard of traditional virology, immunology, and epidemiology. You don't even need to believe a conspiracy to be outraged at the sheer lack of actual science.

When you're constructing a sequence de novo, the bioinformatic algorithms are different than those where you're comparing a sequence to something already sequenced in the database. (Used to work for a genomics company too lol)... I'll see if I can dig up some papers that may help explain the process better for you and give you an idea of what really goes into it.

I'll try to flip through the vid to the flu and terrain, bc I'm curious what he has to say about that. But I stopped at 10 minutes bc he doesn't even know where in the cell a protein is made, I can't really take him seriously. And that's just basic cell bio, not even all the other outlandish and unsourced claims he made.

2
GODwins76 2 points ago +2 / -0

I noticed some of this too. I haven't watched much yet. Let's do some study and find a better comprehensive video.

2
Independenceforever 2 points ago +2 / -0

Dude if you're as "educated" and qualified as you think you are

Could you please help defend society from being purposely collapsed into a superstitious peasantry?

Acting smart isn't as important as being responsible when you have knowledge.

I know your lab work doesn't teach you leadership skills.

But either lead or stop acting like some expert.

It's more important to use your time explaining ONE single reason why you "can't stand" listening to bad ideas than claim there's a million unnamed ones.

Bad ideas must be corrected, So listen and you'll pinpoint WHERE people go astray in their math aka reason.

Ya sound pretty intellectually lazy for a guy whose apparent expertise requires such accuracy and precision. Just TBH bro.

Hope I'm wrong and the fool.

2
Mark4-39 2 points ago +2 / -0

Dude. Save yourself. Whatever it is that you think I'm supposed to do or not do, apply it to your own life. Stop waiting for weirdos on the internet to save you from societal collapse.

As for me, there are more important things in life that butting heads against ppls biases on the internet. If one doesn't believe classical textbooks written by men far more educated than I was, one isn't going to believe me. I'd rather spend my time on things that matter more.

However, if there is something specific you'd like to discuss, let me know. I don't want to take the time away from other things in my life to write a treatise against everything wrong with a video. But we can talk about whatever you want to. Pick something. Intellectually lazy or a better steward of the currency of life? Eh.

I left that world behind bc it was the most miserable 5 years of my life. So as far as conspiracies go, if its bad, I'd believe academia and pharma has done it. Med students are entitled morons who need to practice for a reason, yet still contribute to the 3rd most likely cause of death. But occams razor, it's not that complicated to screw up stuff or be dogmatic about wrong hypotheses, or lie to make money. Not everything is a complex conspiracy. Most things are just the ugly side of human nature. ✌

-3
DavidColeIntrepid -3 points ago +1 / -4

Classic shill tactic of burying my rebuttal, faggot.

1
Mark4-39 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nah, I agree with you, sans flashlights lol

-3
DavidColeIntrepid -3 points ago +1 / -4

Mark is grapheniums alt

2
Mark4-39 2 points ago +2 / -0

Haha.... nah, we have quite different philosophies on a number of things. Still frens tho

-2
Graphenium -2 points ago +3 / -5

Rofl get help

-6
DavidColeIntrepid -6 points ago +1 / -7

Help by answering the question of viruses being dead cells instead of lying like a filthy cunt

-1
Graphenium -1 points ago +3 / -4

You said:

answering the question of viruses being dead cells instead of lying like a filthy cunt

I said, almost a day ago now:

I don’t think they claim that viruses are dead cells, my understanding of their argument was that when cells in “diseased” tissue (aka tissue suffering toxicosis) die, the body, as part of its homeostatic “clean up operations”, collects this toxic refuse (poisonous substances, and rotting flesh), and bundles it up in what have heretofore been called “viruses”, to aid in flushing it from the body without spreading the waste around and causing further negative effects. This is the thesis of the video, and you will need to actually see their argument in order to have an informed discussion.

Oh golly gosh, what a vile, pernicious lie that was... or wait...there is no lie in the statement. Huh. Almost like you’re acting like a spastic for no reason. Fancy that.

-1
DavidColeIntrepid -1 points ago +2 / -3

I don’t think they claim that viruses are dead cells

Yes. You deliberately "misunderstood" and you continue to lie.

0
Graphenium 0 points ago +3 / -3

You deliberately "misunderstood" and you continue to lie.

Speak for yourself spastic

-1
DavidColeIntrepid -1 points ago +3 / -4

I don’t think they claim that viruses are dead cells

They do. They then go into a spiel about mold development happening from inside, using a pile of strawberries molding from the bottom as the example. They then use this deliberately incorrect information to use as a logical fallacy, I don't care about specifically which, to superimpose that onto the incorrect notion of the video that viruses aren't real/come from inside. False equivalence I believe.

Same exact bullshit as saying a flashlight up your asshole on a beach at midnight proves the earth is flat. It's the same playbook. Wether wittingly or not, you use their playbook in shouting me down as a "non-believer" saying "just watch it" like "just shove a flashlight up your ass, brother."

collects this toxic refuse

You're literally just regurgitating what the video said while disregarding the fact they claim "viruses are dead cells"

recontextualizing something that everyone acknowledges,

Nobody fucking "acknowledges" it, asshole. I proved it's fucking wrong. Nobody "acknowledges" the earth is flat either you bad actor punk made flat earth faggot.

-1
Graphenium -1 points ago +3 / -4

They do. They then go into a spiel about mold...

Replying “No.” and then changing the subject isn’t how one has a productive discussion

strawberries molding from the bottom

You can’t even repeat their arguments correctly much less argue cogently against them. It isn’t starting “from the bottom” dipshit, they argue that it starts INSIDE the dead/dying organism.

Re:everything else you spewed, I don’t normally say this but get help buddy, I think your environment has poisoned you and rotted away your ability to comprehend and discuss things like a person. This isn’t a video about flat earth, and given your obsession you honestly seem like a forum sliding shill.

-1
DavidColeIntrepid -1 points ago +1 / -2

Replying “No.” and then changing the subjec

How is that changing the subject? They claim viruses are dead cells. Which your dumbass tried to argue for and then say "no, they didn't say exactly what I just said" like a bitch

You can’t even repeat their arguments correctly

Hey, dumbass. I proved their fucking wrong. Mold spores don't form inside strawberries, asshole.

don’t normally say this but get help buddy

Says the flat earth faggot who constantly lies his ass off. What's the matter? Your momma didn't raise you right? Can't stand up like a man and speak plainly? You fucking weasel.

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +6 / -5

I really think you need help with your anger, whether that’s a joint a day or a lobotomy I can’t tell you. I can tell you that you haven’t contributed a useful thought to this board in what seems like months. You’ve spent over a day arguing with me about a movie you saw 10% of. You’re incapable of addressing their actual arguments so you just attack people instead, either the uploaders or the people here to discuss the video. I’m done responding until you can present a cogent argument, mainly one that isn’t taking the claims of the video and stuffing them into a context that doesn’t hold them, but actually attempting to discern the truth. In other words, watch the video or go shove a flashlight up your ass.

-1
DavidColeIntrepid -1 points ago +2 / -3

you haven’t contributed a useful thought to this board in what seems like months.

You spread flat earth bullshit then lie like a faggot when it's questioned. This claim is also a lie.

You’ve spent over a day arguing with me about

Because your faggot ass keeps lying about the claims made in your flat earth propaganda

You’re incapable of addressing their actual arguments

Viruses are not dead cells and mold spores don't form inside strawberries. And that's 2 lies in less than 20 minutes which you've spent "over a day" lying your ass off about, bitch.

arguments so you just attack people instea

Oh, you're the victim because you spread flat earth bullshit and lie about it? How's the weather in tel aviv?

done responding

Good. Fuck off and stop lying like a bitch, you flat earth inbred little punk.

argument,

Viruses aren't dead cells. Keep lying

stuffing them into a context that doesn’t hold them,

What are you talking about? Use specific examples instead of pretending to be a victim like a fucking woman, bitch. I'm not your husband.

watch the video or go shove a flashlight up your ass.

Shill repsonse . Can't discuss videos contents.

-1
Graphenium -1 points ago +3 / -4

You spread flat earth bullshit then lie like a faggot when it's questioned.

I would ask you how you’ve come to this conclusion, because I’ve never posted in support of FE, and infact have done the opposite multiple times. But I know your answer will be to claim this video is “FE bs”, which brings us to your next spastic outburst:

What are you talking about?

I thought it was obvious but if you’re really this stupid I’ll say it yet again:

The video has nothing to do with FE, and your obsession with FE has tarnished your ability to think critically and address the claims made in the video. Which you still haven’t done, and which is largely impossible for you, as you haven’t watched it.

-2
DavidColeIntrepid -2 points ago +1 / -3

I would ask you how you’ve come to this conclusion

You lied about the viruses are dead cells claim

The video has nothing to do with FE

It does. It was made by flat earth faggots and uses the same tactics. YOU alos use the same tactics. You still haven't addressed a specific example. Again, you lie like a bitch.

and address the claims made in the video. Which you still haven’t done,

Viruses are not dead cells. You lied about it like a shill. Mold spores don't form inside strawberries. You refuse to address it like a bitch

1
DavidColeIntrepid 1 point ago +8 / -7

Germs don't exist? Get the fuck outta here

0
Graphenium 0 points ago +7 / -7

Watch the video, no one ever advances the notion “germs don’t exist”

2
DavidColeIntrepid 2 points ago +8 / -6

What about the narrator saying "germ theory is bullshit" a dozen times in the first 10 minutes I watched?

C'mon, man. You're pissing on my leg and telling me it's raining. Germs are real. The earth isn't flat. Space exists. There are 2 genders.

These are facts

4
clemaneuverers 4 points ago +7 / -3

Germ Theory is bullshit

This does not rule out the exitstence of germs, and the documentary never says they are not real. It's about how the theory of their origin, function, and the affects attributed to them are all essentially bullshit assumptions and up for debate.

2
DavidColeIntrepid 2 points ago +7 / -5

The makers of this video are flat earthers who outright lie constantly. There is no debate.

1
clemaneuverers 1 point ago +6 / -5

So what if they're flat-earthers, they made an excellent overview documentary on the argument for Terrain theory over Germ theory; they didn't discover or develop that theory. They are merely summarising the work of many "non-flat earthers".

Terrain theory goes back to Bechamp, (actually it goes back further, but he's the best known proponent) who was a contemporary and rival of Louis Pasteur, the Germ Theory god. In 1995, Pasteur's private diaries were published for the first time, and they showed what some suspected for a while already; that he was a huckster and a fraud who faked the positive results of his innoculation research to advance his career and profit from his vaccine concoctions. Bechamp's rival theory is and always has been closer to objective truth.

BTW Pasteur's ideas about vaccination were not inspired not by observation; he was inspired by the Rabbis in the Talmud, wherein they argued they could cure rabies in a human by killing the rabid dog that bit the person, removing it's liver, and forcing the sick person to eat some of it.

1
DavidColeIntrepid 1 point ago +6 / -5

So what if they're flat-earthers

They're wrong about everything

Theres absolutely a conversation to be had about corruption in the medical field, that doesn't mean germs aren't real or viruses are cells or mold starts inside or any of the other bullshit.

Just like pointing to nasa doing something doesn't mean the fucking earth is flat.

0
clemaneuverers 0 points ago +4 / -4

I didn't even know they were flat earthers till you pointed it out. It changes nothing, you're using it as an excuse to excuse yourself from looking into this topic ith an open mind.

2
Graphenium 2 points ago +5 / -3

No one in the documentary advances the notion germs aren’t real. You need to work on your discernment and self control bro. You used to contribute now you just try to tear down

2
DavidColeIntrepid 2 points ago +4 / -2

No one in the documentary advances the notion germs aren’t real.

That's what it says in the videos description

origin, function, and the affects attributed to them are all essentially bullshit

I'm having trouble understanding the difference.

Watch the video

Can everyone recognize this is exactly the flat earth playbook? They post a shitty video. I ask where's the confusion, tell me about the video, how does it prove anything?

And the only shill ass response is "just watch it" or "just shove a flashlight up your asshole on a beach"

Any questions about what it proves will be shouted down with emotional outrage against the perceived "other".

You spread flat earth bullshit as the featured doc when there's so many better fucking topics and tell me I need to work on MY discernment?

Get real, dude.

-1
Graphenium -1 points ago +3 / -4

I'm having trouble understanding the difference.

Yes, watching the video would assist with that

-1
DavidColeIntrepid -1 points ago +2 / -3

Went another couple minutes in and there's more "errors".

Viruses are NOT cells. They do not have a nucleus, they cannot self replicate.

On his mold example, mold doesn't form INSIDE anything. Moisture plus mold spores equals growth. It's slightly more complicated than that, but the fact strawberries mold from the bottom of a pile (most wet) isn't rocket surgery.

Again. This is flat earth bullshit. You cannot even explain the most simple concepts to anyone who h proves you have absolutely no understanding of any of it.

Just stick your nose up and act like you're better than everyone because you suck off flat earth retards.

"Just shove a flashlight up your asshole on a beach at midnight. Can you see the flashlight? Boom. Check mate round earthers!!!!!!!"

Get the fuck outta here

-2
DavidColeIntrepid -2 points ago +2 / -4

And when you see a video that says (by space Busters) you can pretty well assume that they're flat earth faggots, because they are.

Space isn't real, earth isn't real, and germs aren't real either. Fuck off

0
DavidColeIntrepid 0 points ago +2 / -2

Before I thought you were just a naive dumbass who was too ready to throw money at any chink eyed drunk trying to play tricks on the ignorant white man with spatklers shoved up a toilet roll. I thought we could have productive conversations. I showed you REAL evidence of psychic abilities.

Now, in my mind you are another forthegenerations alt who shouts down everyone talking about flashlights up your ass on a beach.

0
Graphenium 0 points ago +2 / -2

That’s likely because you’re small minded on topics you’re unfamiliar with. You’re still arguing with me about watching the doc, in a fucking discussion thread for the doc.

1
DavidColeIntrepid 1 point ago +1 / -0

I watched more than enough of it, and you seem to be incapable of discussing it.

-2
Graphenium -2 points ago +1 / -3

Start a new thread with some actual discussion, ping me, and I’d be more than happy to partake. I just think blanket dismissals of things because of perceived issues with the video uploaders ideology are dumb (note, not a word of flat earth is mentioned in the video, so derailing the discussion thread by bitching about it is just as bad or worse than what you think they do).

1
MOCKxTHExCROSS 1 point ago +1 / -0

Disagree with the premise that viruses don't exist. What about the tobacco mosaic virus, the first isolated? Just finished the original 1938 paper on its isolation and it didn't seem like fraud to me.

1
Merkava_4 1 point ago +2 / -1

What's the gist of the video? It's 2 hours long. Anybody watch the whole thing?

3
Mark4-39 3 points ago +3 / -0

No. I got 10 minutes in and some dude said viral proteins are made in the nucleus and I had to dip. It's so full if errors we could spend a year discussing them all.

1
Independenceforever 1 point ago +1 / -0

So teach something TRUE instead.

Learn to USE the mistakes of a lesser mind to SHOWCASE the knowledge God sent you to share with others.

Merely putting them down doesn't put you over. Or truth.

1
Mark4-39 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fair enough

1
Independenceforever 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's not a way to "science" bro.

-3
DavidColeIntrepid -3 points ago +4 / -7

(By Space Busters)

Someone tell me again how this flat earth bullshit isn't flat earth bullshit.

2
Independenceforever 2 points ago +2 / -0

NASA wanted to discredit critics of NASA

So they fund something to embarrass and discredit their perceived enemies.

One minor mistake in an equation makes it worthless, people.

Think in terms of MATH not feelings.

In absence of strong reason and wisdom, people will believe anything that seems to be true.

E.G. "vaccines" "socialism" etc