You're right, I should have said that the chances are very very x 10000 slim.
Even compared to other closed nations, the n. korea's communicative data provided to geopolitical analysts are absurdly limited. So the one who's willing to or need to look beyond what ap or/and reuters publish would need to study their systems and history first to understand their current affairs faster and better.
Let me specify why many believe that the probability of kim jong-il's demise being an assassination is "very very x 10000 slim."
First,
until recently (the late 2016, more precisely) people of kim jong-il's so called paektu bloodline had a total grip on n. korea's all three major factions (the old revolutionary, hyper pro sino military generals, and the high echelons of bureaucrats in the workers' party). Those were the times when paektu bloodline people occupied more than the 90 percent of "positions that matter."
Second,
until aug. 2017, russia's svr rf was providing 'daily' intelligence + necessary resources for n. korea's top eight's security. This measure came from kim's distrust in some factions of n. korea + 'chinese people,' probably due to his father's dying wish ("Chinese people are our thousand years' enemy.").
Several accounts agree that kim had started to 'try to get putin's attention' even before putin became the head of the security council. Once putin agreed, in return kim was said to have 'helped' with disclosing the ccp's opioid/fentanyl 'exporting' routes to russia and he let russia use nampo and chongjin harbour.
And said measure turned out to being highly successful (?) was at the very least 'bothering beijing.' Even the ccp generals back pockets.
Third,
both of the brzezinski faction and the jarrett clique were still supporting kim 'with actual means' and in fact they're the ones who made sure kim jong-un's 'safe and peaceful enthronement' from (hyper) pro sino factions in n. korea. -- This sentence probably confuses people because said two groups are known for being pro beijing. But as you know, in the geopolitical realm, nothing is black and white, and there is never just one.
The rumour was that Kim jong-il's blackshirts were carrying out the eur super counterfeit project for the jarrett clique (and the genie energy faction), and it continued after 2012 (until 2017).
Fourth,
early nov. 2011, russia's an-148 landed in pyongyang with swiss medical staff and equipments, and eight more of an-148 were said to circle around the class b airspaces of pyongyang, wonsan, kaesong, chongjin, hamhung, and nampo between nov. 2011 and feb. 2012. What does it mean?
And lastly,
bonus things to consider: When kim jong-nam died? Feb. 2017. What happened in 2016 in the us? What was kim jong-nam in charge of when he's alive? The room 39. The faction in n.korea that controls the weapon deals and drug, especially fentanyl, production & trafficking via the ccp. Edited to add: And when the us admin allowed the following disclose: kim jong-nam was a cia channel (or informant if you want) in n. korea? June 2019. A couple of months after a supposedly 'hidden tv camera' caught kim jong-un having a smoke break on his train journey to his summit with Trump. What does it mean? What happened in the 2019 hanoi summit? How? Why?
Conclusion:
It's highly x 10000 probable that kim jong-il died from natural causes because many of dominant factions wanted him to keep going with what him and factions closed to him were doing. And kim's safety had a solid reassurance by one of the top tier intelligence agency(s).
Another edited to add (and probably last :p I need to get back to work.):
The second and third points above belong to the reasons why many believe that the probability of kim jong-il's demise being an assassination is "very very x 10000 slim,"
because the brzezinski faction and the jarrett clique were the one who 'destroyed' the bo xilai faction in order to put the xi jinping's princelings in power.
but in fact, he may have been the only one that could have pulled out a win in 2016.
This seems to be correct. I heard a rumour that in 2017 Nate Silver simulated Hilary vs Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Chris Christie, or Jeb Bush. Not one of those Republican Party nominees was said not be able to get more than 207(+-3) electoral votes.
Kim Jong-il, no. Kim Jong-nam and Kim Jong-un, yes.
Every narrative on all sides is pushing for war against China.
So, tell me who is currently pushing for war against China?
China has sought to isolate over the last decade and its growing..
What isolation? You mean Chinese Dream, MIC2025, and BRI?
this is instability and resistance to globalism..
Huh? Your definition of globalism must be different from mine.
find me a real provable example China cares two shits for you or your country.
Of course, Xi Jinping & Co., his so called princelings and their enablers such as Zhang Youxia and Chen Quanguo, have hardly had a time to 'care two shits for you or your country,' because they have been so busy being spineless bitches for the Rockefellers. You know what? Xi Jinping & Co. are loving it though. All because, breaking China's long-established 太上王 institution, they have been and will be able to stay in power a lot longer than all of Xi's predecessors combined. With the help of, none other than, the cliques of Zbigniew Brzezinski, Valerie Jarrett, and John Sawers. Fighting against American imperialists, my ass.
Theater for? Come on, please elaborate a bit, eh?
Hm. Sure, I'll play.
Do you know why Jeffrey Epstein allowed himself to be arrested on July 6, 2019?
I presume you haven't yet investigate the subject enough to form a hypothesis or two, so a couple of your hunches are welcome here.
And let me specify a couple of points:
- To understand Xi Jinping and the modern CCP better, we must understand the significance of Jiang Zemin and his Shanghai clique in the CCP history, as well as who placed (helped to place) Xi Jinping at the power.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wang_Lijun_incident
-
As soon as China became a member of WTO, George Soros started to invest in China's state-sponsored enterprises, such as HNA Group and Alibaba Group. You'd need to ask how and why here, obviously.
-
As Soros and other globalists have heavily invested in the modern CCP's projects, these mega wealthy foreign business parties started to 'be more closely intertwined with' the Rockefellers. They love each others so much because of two common objectives they are after: reinstating the feudal system worldwide and discovering the secrets of immortality.
-
For the context of the article "George Soros calls Xi Jinping 'the most dangerous enemy'": Here, Soros is blaming Xi's 國進民退 movement. Not much else.
Let me offend the OP a bit.
Citing this NYP article "George Soros calls Xi Jinping 'the most dangerous enemy'" or other articles alike, if someone claims George Soros must not 'like' Xi Jinping that much since Soros slams Xi in public; it means he or she has little idea of two things: (1) the structure of the modern CCP and (2) the history between so called globalists and the CCP.
Most of challenges on TikTok have been designed to collect biometrics data of certain demographics. 'They' realized that (collecting) selfies wouldn't suffice for every use case.
We all know that in this day and age when it comes to non-local news, most so called news organizations are quoting what Reuters and Associated Press report. So, we must remain vigilant and always try to read between the lines. In my experience, keeping track of "which 'journalists' write about what kind of subjects or news at a certain specific time" helps.
Having said that,
I usually skip the articles by Associated Press (AP) and those quoting AP's, because people like Mary Junck, Gary Pruitt, and Steven Swartz have involved in the AP's 'leadership.' People who have helped the 'entanglement' centred on the Clinton Foundation and Valerie Jarrett's clique.
Oh, the CCP has been knee-deep in the so called globalism frameworks of the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers. Especially with the Rockefellers. And there is a good reason why the current globalist factions consider China as their new hub. It's been a long time in the making.
"Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution, it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community of purpose." — David Rockefeller [LINK]
In the end, the Zionist factions are merely one part of the bigger picture.
Israel & China [LINK]
The Alliance Between China and Zionism [LINK]
Mao's Jews [LINK]
How Shanghai clique and Prominent Globalists Got Together [LINK]
And remember, who has helped build today's medical industry in China.
"The [Rockefeller] foundation not just wanted to establish a first-class school of medicine in China. It also introduced the US Johns Hopkins model to the Peking Union Medical College Hospital, and viewed it as a laboratory of their social ideas, which reflects the foundation's ambition to change China." [LINK]
The Arab world has insured Palestine stays powerless.
Nodded with agreement
Yea, I get the point. But, in this particular case of Israeli military offense, the Netanyahu regime is believed to work for the CCP's money. The financier of the Israeli portion on EastMed probably said "Hey, guys. How's hanging? You know the so called anti-Israeli factions on Gaza and Lebanon? We would like to see them gone by 2025. So when our pipeline becomes operational, no more bullshit around the pipeline region, yea?"
Hm. I heard that it's not a couple of specific people. Rather a committee of "responsible persons" selected by Obama, Kerry, and Harris. Biden isn't in it, that's for sure at this point.
But I doubt that anything will come of it.
Same here. But, we shouldn't take this sitting down and being quiet. I guess I'm still one of those naive ones.
Yea, probably they can recover them.
But isn't the county's 'attempt' to delete them that does count?
I understand Hillary pulled a similar trick and got acquitted. However, if someone tried to 'delete' the subpoenaed or alike days before the investigation or the audit took place, it should at least raise some eyebrows.
The letter from Arizona Senate President Karen Fann to Maricopa County Supervisor Chairman Jack Sellers:
We have recently discovered that the entire “Database” directory from the D drive of the machine “EMSPrimary” has been deleted. This removes election related details that appear to have been covered by the subpoena.
In addition, the main database for the Election Management System (EMS) Software, “Results Tally and Reporting,” is not located anywhere on the EMSPrimary machine, even though all of the EMS Clients reference that machine as the location of the database. This suggests that the main database for all election-related data for the November 2020 General Election has been removed.
Mr. Ramez Al-Halabi, so called the PIJ Official, has been rumoured to be 'working' with Saudi-sponsored Palestinian factions. As we all know most Palestinians are Sunni Muslims, but I don't believe it has anything to do with religious affiliations. At the same time I can see no benefit Palestine would have achieved by disclosing they're being helped by Iran Shi'a.
(Because, as usual, Saudi do not want to get their bloody hands dirty in a formal way,) by overstressing the religious Sunni vs. Shi'a pretext here, Mr. Al-Halabi's advertisement on air may have been an attempt to provide pro-Saudi factions in Iraq with an 'official' excuse for coming out and participating in the current abomination in Jerusalem. Since Saudi king has 'officially' expressed the support for Palestinian, if Saudi-backed Iraqi factions (and/or any other Saudi-backed factions) join Israel's bombing, it wouldn't appear as KSA's doing.
By publicly claiming the supply is coming from Iran, they were goading pro-Saudi factions in Iraq. Considering ongoing Iran–Saudi proxy conflicts, it's a bit surprising that said factions have not been involved already. -- Those factions were rumoured to have not yet. And what do you know, Saudi monarch just expressed their support for Palestinian and condemned Israeli actions in Jerusalem. Hm. I thought Saudi's aspect in the recent Arab detente was mostly a charade.
Like I mentioned already too many times on this board, what has been happening since 2020 in the US is clearly a version of so called colour revolution. Its prep was initiated around at 2007, and after 2016, its course was revised and ramped up.
However, a more important matter to note down, than the answer to who are getting benefited from all these, is that identity politics, their main weapon in colour revolution, is designed to divide and weaken us, the normies, the working class, or the middle class. -- It's aimed to redirect our attention from economic and political interests, then to refocus said attention on relatively trivial issues like race, gender, or sexual orientation. It's a truly strategic operation.
We must remember that which factions have been backing BLM and Antifa. [1] [2]
Whatever that thing is, it’s not Melinda Gates.
Ha. I guess people see that, eh? 2007. It was 2007 when the rumour went around that she started the therapy. https://archive.ph/F7ZyE
The divorce is as much of a myth as the marriage.
Nodded with agreement.
Eh. I'm not so sure. I think my interpretation (?) is more of mainstream-y since I'm coming from geopolitics.
Hm. Like u/Mad_King_Kalak said, it's a tough choice. One is a puppet of genie energy faction, and the other one is the newly manufactured puppet by brzezinski faction, which was requested by cia via atlantic council.
Knowing what has been known, not sure about domestic policies but my hunch is that foreign policies of those two figure's wouldn't have been different too much.
This is such a great point and I can't stress enough its significance.