And like most times your dick gets hard, you stop thinking.
What good comes from the WEF that would require us to more digging?
FWIW, TheImpossible1 compiled a bunch links demonstrating just how bad she is, so I'd say we're far more informed than someone who just goes to Wikipedia for their research.
https://communities.win/c/KotakuInAction2/p/16b6Dhyyw8/x/c/4TtrIM6rFfE
lol that's just a drop in the ocean for her resume
TheImpossible1 did a great write up of what a swamp monster she is
https://communities.win/c/KotakuInAction2/p/16b6Dhyyw8/x/c/4TtrIM6rFfE
Elon is Agent Orange 2.0
Yaccarino has also partnered with government on several occasions, first helping to promote healthy lifestyles as a member of the President’s Council on Sports Fitness and Nutrition, appointed by former President Donald Trump, and later working with government agencies, the White House and Pope Francis to produce a Covid-19 vaccination campaign in her role as chair of nonprofit advertising group the Ad Council.
Take it and you're weak.
How is it being weak when you understand the situation with clarity and know what actually needs to be done?
Weak is thinking politicians and zoomers are going to save you and you just need to vote harder.
Great investigative work.
Any way Trump could appeal the decision and argue that the law is bullshit?
Someone else mentioned that the law is ex post facto, which I know to be illegal under the Constitution.
Article I, Section 10, Clause 1:
No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.
I guess the argument could be made that the law only amends the statute of limitations so it's not really ex post facto.
Interesting, thanks for sharing!
As long as it’s fully backed and redeemable, it seems good to me, but could also be a stepping stone to a surveillance digital currency. The devil is in the details. Will the digital currency be permissionless or private? Can addresses be sanctioned?
Yeah, this is the key for me, especially whether it can be withheld for having the wrong opinions.
LOL omg you're actually asking for evidence about TRUMP!?
Holy shit, are you stupid or do you really need evidence?
I'm guessing you see nothing wrong with the vaccine salesman, lockdown supporting, gun control supporting, DREAMer loving NY Liberal.
You're either too stupid to be conversating with or you're a shill.
In either case, I'm done letting you waste my time.
EDIT: this guy is still going after I told him I'm no longer responding to him lol
But he isn't a globalist nor has he ever taken any globalist stances.
People enjoy hearing their beliefs being repeated back to them by celebrities. It makes them feel validated. These are the people that are supposed to be on our side and they're easily fooled. This is why I'm blackpilled.
So another gateway to digital prison hell.
You'd have to buy the crypto, so you're not required to use it.
And the crypto can be redeemed for gold/silver or money.
My biggest concern would be how it would not be used to prevent us from making purchases and whether purchases would be anonymous.
In the case of anonymity, I guess we'd have to redeem the crypto into gold/silver/money.
The Left vs Right paradigm is real. You can't tell me the world wouldn't be different if it was ruled exclusively by leftwingers or rightwingers.
What you're probably referring to is the democrat vs republican paradigm, which is in fact a facade for the most part. No matter which one you vote for, the country ultimately moves in the same direction and the same agenda is carried out.
According to the article, you can redeem the crypto for gold (or money).
then why not just let us trade in silver and gold?
I don't think there's a law against trading in silver and gold.
I think the problem is that they'd have to buy the gold/silver and start minting coins, then put the coins in circulation. Not necessarily a tough thing, but it's easier to set up the crypto blockchain and then, if you want the physical gold, you can redeem it.
BTW I'm not saying your concerns aren't valid, I'm just offering what I think is the answer to your questions. Personally, I would love for a crypto expert to read through the bill and explain everything and give their thoughts.
Maybe. The law would require them to purchase that amount of physical gold and store it. That gold could and should be audited. With that said, who knows what could happen one day where they either lie or refuse to be audited, like Fort Knox or the federal reserve. If the law doesn't address this, then yeah, it's flawed.
Something to note is that the Texas bill allowed to redeem the digital currency for gold.
People could choose to use Bitcoin or Monero. However, constitutionally, Gold and Silver are the only legal tender that states are allowed to mint, if I'm not mistaken. The Texas bill would be constitutional in that sense.
I understand where you're coming from, but I don't think the WEF is a good example. Also, you calling them lemmings and lackwits just makes you look like a douchebag, which I think is a point your last sentence hammers home.
BTW You might not want to use Wikipedia for your political research.