-5
user20461 -5 points ago +1 / -6

Don't make me tap the sign

👇

No matter many times you've been proven wrong in a span of 10 minutes, you will come back with more stupid shit that requires me to waste my time to prove you wrong.

I'm done here.

-4
user20461 -4 points ago +1 / -5

https://archive.ph/rFFIP

While rumors instantly swirled that Zinn may have been the shooting suspect, authorities quickly announced this was not the case and the culprit is still at large.

You know what separates stupid people from the average person?

Stupid people don't learn from their mistakes. They're hopeless.

No matter many times you've been proven wrong in a span of 10 minutes, you will come back with more stupid shit that requires me to waste my time to prove you wrong.

I'm done here.

-2
user20461 -2 points ago +1 / -3

Yes, in terms of POLITICIANS AND JOURNALISTS (who are exposing Israel's crimes).

Israel fries bigger fish, like politicians and journalists who will expose them.

Charlie Kirk, Nick Fuentues, and Jake Shields are pundits.

GD I hate stupid people.

0
user20461 0 points ago +1 / -1

Just because you like Jake Shields better, does not mean he has more reach.

WTF are you talking about

I never said he had more reach than either Nick or Charlie Kirk

-2
user20461 -2 points ago +1 / -3

The murder is obviously by someone with training, but I'm not sold that it was Israel. Lots of famous people have turned against Israel and none of them have been killed.

Israel fries bigger fish, like politicians and journalists who will expose them.

But if they wanted to go after critics who are turning the world against them, I'd say Nick Fuentes is a better target. Jake Shields, too. In comparison, Charlie Kirk makes no sense compared to those guys.

1
user20461 1 point ago +1 / -0

Weird how Trump isn't sucking his dick

3
user20461 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, my main reason for posting this thread is that, since people want to believe, it's only a matter of time before supply meets demand, like how governments are admitting to aliens and whatnot, and AI can help with that.

1
user20461 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yup, this is just more honesty and transparency from both the politicians and the people who vote for them.

1
user20461 1 point ago +2 / -1

I stopped posting there when all my shitposts kept getting taken seriously.

I even remember the last time I posted:

https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/15HIK1A8eZ/id-vote-for-him/c

Many comments were taking the thread title seriously and debating whether the guy could be trusted to be in office. Mind you, the guy wasn't running for office and hadn't ran for a long time now. i just said, "I'd vote for him" because it's a shitpost.

FWIW that's actually a real quote.

2
user20461 2 points ago +2 / -0

Before anything, if they flag too many people, those people are either going to submit or they will boycott and YT is going to walk it back or go out of business.

With that said, I know we should all be skeptical, but I'm reading that post and only see 1 thing wrong with it, and I'm going to re-iterate how it works and what it does:

AI checks for:

  1. Type of videos you're searching for
  2. Type of content you watch
  3. Age of the account (when it was created)

It asks: does children's content make up the majority of your time on YT and your account isn't very old?

If yes, then you're probably a child.

In which case, it takes the following actions on the account:

  1. Disable personalized advertising
  2. Safeguards to Recommendations (you won't get "Mature" content in your Recommendations)
  3. Limited repeated views of some kinds of content
  4. Turn on Digital Well-being tools
  • Time Watched Profile (shows you how long you've been watching videos)
  • Take a Break Reminders
  • Scheduled Notification Digests (notifications are queued and pushed all at once)
  • Disable Notification Sounds & Vibrations
  • Turn off Autoplay
  1. Restricted Mode (filters out potentially mature content)

That last one is the one that we're all concerned about (I'm pretty sure many people don't care about the others). However, it's also important to note that "mature content" is usually dealing with death, violence, vulgur language, etc. And many channels have already censored themselves as to avoid being demonetized. <- That's important because, even if you get flagged, you're very likely still able to watch those videos (or the creators will clean up their content).

FWIW, the content I watch is DIY, true crime, documentaries, cooking, clips from TV shows, news/politics, and some sports.

I don't see anything there that would raise suspicion that I'm a child. And my account is very old.

Again, this is taking YT's word for it, so I could get flagged down the line.

And considering that it's already in effect, either the AI doesn't find something suspicious about my account or it hasn't gotten to me, yet.

In conclusion, I'm not freaking out until it at least starts being abused.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›