If you had any faith you'd realize the body of Christ can never be erased from the world.
I recall from previous comments you still don't know the gospel and you never preach it. So in your heart Christ's kingdom wasn't there in the first place to be erased.
You just sound very angry and unsaved.
No not the biggest. We've been electing murderers and rapists for president this entire time. So I'll vote for the scumbag willing to call Climate Change a hoax.
That being said, will Vivek change his tune when the deep state let's him know his life is on the line? Probably. But what if he is willing to die? You just never know.
Support the literal nonwhite foreign mystery meat
I'm not a racist, I'm a Christian. You need to be born again or you will not be saved.
YOU’RE CLINICALLY FUCKING INSANE.
Is it insane to think he will almost certainly betray us? Sounds pretty sane to me. But in the mean time I'm going to reward the puppet who is telling the most truth and is the freshest face. Why not? He has the highest chance of saying "f-ck it" and doing the right thing. Psychological torture? lol, not even.
I also get takeout food from Hindu pagans, should I stop that too?
But I have no idea Vivek's religion, he claims to believe in and respect God, that's all I've seen stated.
Yes, clearly it had to be GHz.
With all due respect, you clearly said GB multiple times, which isn't clearly GHz at all.
Really your entire response is showing what I initially stated, that you don't have a solid understanding of the science.
Here's some links to the citations you wanted: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-40942-8 (Graphene in 5G environment) https://www.nature.com/articles/nature26160 (Graphene as a superconductor)
Those papers did not confirm your original claim. So you were confusing several points in your statement about graphene oxide -> "It is important to note that Graphene Oxide becomes a SUPERCONDUCTOR when it reaches EM levels of just several GB."
Oh, you meant only graphene oxide... Fine here's a link - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0254058419310673
No, you said Graphene Oxide, it wasn't about what I meant. And the paper you provided on GO didn't confirm your initial statement either.
So you're very unclear on the science you are stating, and you keep changing your story. These arguments you are making are getting long winded and are almost all not properly citing what specifically you needed to cite. So I'm done. But I appreciate your time.
Nothing more hideous than cross fit pullups.
It is important to note that Graphene Oxide becomes a SUPERCONDUCTOR when it reaches EM levels of just several GB.
GB? Are you sure you don't mean GHz?
Also do you have a citation for that, I've never heard that microwaving graphene oxide makes it a superconductor. I know that graphene by itself (no oxide) is a great conductor on its own. For graphene oxide I've read it can be a not so great conductor. Someone here asked a question about it on Research Gate, and apparently the less oxidized it is the better it can conduct, but graphene by itself would always be superior. https://www.researchgate.net/post/Whether_graphene_oxide_is_a_good_electrical_conductor_or_not
Doctors find these bubbles that connect as a network to be the graphene quantum dots.
I could use a citation on this.
Overall I don't think the way you are presenting this argument is clear or one thing following with another. A lot of what you mention applies to whether or not the parasite class wants to do or is planning to do all these things. Or course they are. The question I have is whether or not these particular shots causing their particular problems are graphene or graphene oxide by and large.
You mentioned a paper about magneto-proteins for mind control, I've seen that too. However it has nothing to do with graphene. I still think graphene could be a red herring or predictive programming. They will roll it out later, but for now they jump the gun on it.
They don't bank on "one small injection", that's why they focus to "boost" as much as possible every single human.
Perhaps. Maybe they are adding more and more machinery to build a network. I can't say. I just think there needs to be more data on the graphene argument to make a compelling case. It's not a solid case yet for the long clots and I have my doubts. Though I also know they want to make people transhuman.
Ok, I see. I wasn't clear on that follow up sentence. The "that" I was referring to is the stringification you showed in the video of carbon nanotubes under an electric field. Not production of graphene from carbon nanotubes, which was not in my mind.
The paper you showed confirmed my first sentence, "Graphene may be carbon, but it is a flat sheet and not a tube" which is what I'm seeing.
Also, although 5G used EMF (which includes an electromagnetic component) a microwave emf does not behave the same as a pure electric field, so it isn't certain such an effect would be produced by it unless the experiment uses emfs directly. Not to mention the fact it was using carbon nano tubes and not graphene molecules. I don't claim I know for sure all of what graphene can do, just saying there is insufficient evidence to conclusively say the rope clots are from that.
Ok I'll bite. What claim do you think I made, and what in the article proved that wrong? Please quote me and the article.
Yeah, you don't even understand what I was saying to begin with about graphene and carbon nanotubes. Go back and re-read.
I wonder if he is an mk ultra pawn.
The part of the paper where it draws a clear distinction between graphene and carbon nanotubes (as I did). They are not the same thing. It's in the first paragraph.
A few years back, Tour developed a process for “unzipping” carbon nanotubes so that they transformed into graphene.
They have to be transformed to be graphene (or vice versa). So you didn't read or comprehend the first paragraph of the source you used. You're completely talking out of your ass, with all due respect.
And you still haven't addressed the issue of the quantity of material. So I already dismantled your arguments (and alleged evidence) and you don't have a rebuttal besides getting mad.
I don't think your ignorance of carbon nanotubes and graphene reflects on your status with God. But your unwillingness to be humble and accept correction could be.
I think you're projecting, with all due respect. What I said in my comment is correct, you didn't understand your own source if you think it contradicts me.
https://spectrum.ieee.org/graphene-and-carbon-nanotubes-two-great-materials-even-better-together - Here's a link where you can educate yourself more on Graphene nanotubes and how they require no additional material. Single atom layer nanotube, not whatever you were thinking.
That article just supported exactly what I was saying. I'm not going to bother with the rest of your arguments since you've proven you have no idea what you're talking about with regards to graphene and carbon nano tubes.
If they actually said 99% and not 100%, ok. That's basically saying it is 100%.
How come you state that a "spike protein seems plausible to make rope-like structures"? Please explain
I already explained, since it is an amyloid forming protein when it breaks down. Some doctors have said the ropes could be amyloid formations.
Here's how graphene oxide can create these rope-like structures.
Those are carbon nano-tubes. Graphene may be carbon, but it is a flat sheet and not a tube. That also requires an electric field and a hell of a lot more material than could be inside a small injection.
I don't doubt they could have different chemicals in different vials. But I think it is strange La Quinta early on claimed it was 100% graphene and nothing else. No other groups were seeing just that.
Also graphene doesn't explain the rope like structures found in the blood while an amyloid forming protein like the spike protein seems plausible.
Because you haven't gone down to skid row and asked anyone to stay in your guesthouse. Though probably for good reason.
What a bizarre statement. Jesus rebuked the Jews for going their own way and becoming children of the devil. Yet you think that book is on their side. The Bible is the same book these modern devils want to lead people away from (and for you they successfully have).
You're a product of decades of anti-christ programming, Hollywood wants to lead you away from the Bible, not to it.
Not what the Bible states at all. But the Bible does state that God judges nations. The USA has followed a predictable course of idolatry into judgement.
People living after the flesh (racists) blame everything on immigration. But you folks always miss the part where your people rejected God and embraced hedonism and idolatry.
There has been plenty of activity with 3D printing the last several years. There are communities and youtube channels centered around it.
They've already signaled that they plan a pandemic 2. They have most people's immune systems compromised with the jab and could start using their DEW (EMF) disease causing weapons via cell towers.
Hopefully they don't, I'd like to enjoy this year, at least somewhat. But the prophetic timeline isn't dictated by my whims, sadly.
Perhaps you're suffering from some narcissistic delusions, because when confronted with clear evidence you don't understand a topic you run from the truth and gishgallop (or get offended). I recommend praying and repenting about it.