4
the-new-style 4 points ago +4 / -0

let us all know how to identify them then

1
the-new-style 1 point ago +1 / -0

tbh it's one of those things that one considers common knowledge in these circles.

I happy you posted it, it's not like it's my material.

2
the-new-style 2 points ago +2 / -0

I meant more in the general sense. He's going there as King Libertarian.

2
the-new-style 2 points ago +2 / -0

Enemies almost always act cordial to each other in meetings

2
the-new-style 2 points ago +2 / -0

there have been multiple posts on the topic

but what do you want people to say when there is no info

"come one everyone, let's wildly speculate"

when in all likelihood it is a mass chimp-out

0
the-new-style 0 points ago +1 / -1

you know what it means, you just want to whine like a girl

4
the-new-style 4 points ago +4 / -0

Build Trust Back Better

1
the-new-style 1 point ago +1 / -0

until it affects them directly ...

which, of course, will be too late

5
the-new-style 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's 1920s Germany all over again

Jews using foreign loans buying up property from desperate locals suffering from cash flow issues stemming from high inflation.

3
the-new-style 3 points ago +3 / -0

rookie numbers

Diethylstilbestrol (DES) was discovered in 1938 and introduced for medical use in 1939. From about 1940 to 1971, the medication was given to pregnant women in the incorrect belief that it would reduce the risk of pregnancy complications and losses. In 1971, DES was shown to cause clear-cell carcinoma, a rare vaginal tumor, in those who had been exposed to this medication in utero.

By 2007, it was only used in the treatment of prostate cancer and breast cancer. In 2011, Hoover and colleagues reported on adverse health outcomes linked to DES including infertility, miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, preeclampsia, preterm birth, stillbirth, infant death, menopause prior to age 45, breast cancer, cervical cancer, and vaginal cancer.

1
the-new-style 1 point ago +2 / -1

I don't know but I would also bet that the contents of each tweet is hashed in order to find regular spammers. You might have encountered "that comment has already been posted" on some forums. It would be retarded to not do that.

1
the-new-style 1 point ago +1 / -0

Joi was never truly emotionally attached to K

it was a machine, machines don't have emotions

Joi - Jerk Off instructions

read "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep" instead of goyslop movies

by DrLeaks
1
the-new-style 1 point ago +1 / -0

Alex Jones

Right Wing

pick one

4
the-new-style 4 points ago +4 / -0

I loved how "no known adverse effects". How would you know, you have absolutely no idea what random proteins do!

2
the-new-style 2 points ago +2 / -0

who told you that?

https://www.service-public.fr/particuliers/vosdroits/F14042?lang=en

Verified 11 August 2023 - Legal and Administrative Information Directorate (Prime Minister), Ministry of Justice

Genetic testing is permitted only in the context of legal proceedings with one of the following objectives:

  • Establish or challenge a relationship of parentage

The paternity test can be done using one of the following methods:

  • Comparative blood test
  • DNA identification (DNA testing)

perhaps it is this exception:

no paternity testing can be done before birth.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›