Of course we have an organization, I've never hidden that. It's going wonderfully. You're sounding needlessly threatening.
I don't intend to miss questions, which is a funny charge given that you just told me not to respond. (Logic fail.)
I explained my landrush strategy at c/Unspoil. There is no division in Christ. It's impossible to expose evil deeds of a person not doing evil. Plus, a wise man likes criticism, so go right ahead.
72 subs? Yes. u/SwampRangers? Yes. WTF? I don't answer that. Hey, u/SwampRangers, do you care to comment? Obviously I did. Looks like I did answer all your questions.
Nazis Aren't Christians bookmark
Worship the One Jew. The real Jesus is a Jew and King of the Jews. You deny Jesus every time you deflect from him.
I took that title to prevent anyone else from it. It's worked.
Remember 3 weeks ago when I told you I had lots of varied subs, including c/FlatEarth and c/Nazi, and you applauded me for promoting anothers' subs over my own, when you were being so kind to me and my mod capabilities?
Remember 3 weeks ago when you started turning on me and I stopped promoting myself as mod, except I've had 3 weeks rent-free living in your mind?
I understand if you're so limited as not to have seen a branch of the conversation you were in that discussed exactly this.
And you treat me like someone who deletes evidence when I have nothing to hide and delete nothing.
In 2022 there was a landrush. Many contributors picked up many names, often to abandon them. I hold names speculatively in case they become viable, as a couple have, and I offer any community its self-determination rights. Some call that squatting, but nobody had prior claim to them so it was a landrush.
Add: I infer by your asking me to comment that your restriction on my responding to you has been lifted.
You name me, you get replied to. About the only thing I can think of that you'd mean by brigading is replying to your 11 identical comments with 11 identical comments. I proposed a couple ways by which the community could decide how to discipline unproductive accounts, and since you didn't like them I'm not pressing for much of anything in particular. Except the right to contextualize statements that I know need it.
Worship the One Jew. The real Jesus is a Jew and King of the Jews. You deny Jesus every time you deflect from him.
Ovidius Naso.
No relationship between "Jesus" and "Zeus". Even if he didn't exist the Jesus narrative indicates a better concept and a better community to follow than any other. But all historians know he existed.
Nazis Aren't Christian bookmark
Freedman argues that Wycliffe 1345 found "there was no English word" for Judean so he used a word phonetically spelled "gyu" for Judean; but etymologists now know that English forms like "Iewe" date back to the 1000s, from French 800s "Ju" which simply elides Latin "Judaeus", so his argument is false. He backhandedly admits this is "just the same as we call a laboratory a 'lab'", but there is no distinction in any language between the contraction and the older form, and no evidence of corruption.
He continues, "So-called Jews ... weren't Jews, as I just explained to you. They were Eastern Europeans who'd been converted to Talmudism. There was no such thing as Judaism. Judaism was a name given in recent years to this religion known in Bible history as Torah." This is false because the Bible calls the religion Ioudaismos or Judaism. The Eastern European converts, such as they were, became full Judahites (Jews) and practiced full Judaism. If the religion had ever been called Talmudism as if to distinguish itself from Ioudaismos, there would have been a breaking point where it left Judaism and became something else, but the history is continuous and unbroken.
He earlier elaborated, "The eastern European Jews, who form 92 per cent of the world's population of those people who call themselves Jews, were originally Khazars." The proportion may be accurate but is now 75%; the claim as if they are all Khazar-descended is false. He refers to importing "thousands of these rabbis" for "maybe ten to twenty million people"; this is false because the most liberal estimate for the army's size is only 100,000. As I showed in the earlier link, the Khazars could not have become Jewish without heavy genetic admixture from existing Judahites (Jews). He doubles down, ignoring his 94% number, saying without justification, "There isn't one Jew who's a Semite. They're all Turkothean Mongoloids." Seeing as Freedman is defaming his own ethnicity as unscrupulous, it seems clear that he cannot be taken as the most reliable source himself.
I'm not going into the depths of the "fault" of the wars because obviously they were cabal-directed and also relied on the choices of the public actors. That's tangential to the current argument for which this was posted.
I didn't say "only"! Jesus's long name indeed includes Everlasting Father. We not only follow his example but are born anew of him, the only experience that can enable us to walk his ways by new life and not by dead human effort.
Thanks fren. Keep meditating and breathing and more truth will come as it does for us all. The fact remains that we choose aspects of our afterlife now and Jesus seems more spiritually connected than anyone and so I want to be with him in whatever is his afterlife, out of all my options. Wanting to be like him means me putting up with some pretty dogmatic people but they too come into more truth and are free to accept or reject it. As you grow you come to find that most of the ancient messages, including the Bible, aren't as ugly as detractors make them out to be, and there are good historicocultural reasons for their framework, and each aspect of them informs our lives now. The skeptical atheist creates the repulsion, but the one who constantly seeks more truth, knowledge, and experience of the divine will find it and will realize that the old ways had hints of the same too.
Because Jesus agreed in many ways he was a Ioudaios Judahite and that word was elided to Ju in the 800s. Do you reject Jesus's words?
Worship the One Jew. The real Jesus is a Jew and King of the Jews. You deny Jesus every time you deflect from him.
First, Koestler's work was funded by British intelligence. Second, the book is called The Thirteenth Tribe: The Khazar Empire and Its Heritage. Third, it's not about all Jews, it's about Ashkenazi Jews, which is not the question here. Fourth, he posited that removing a bio link to Ashkenazim would reduce anti-Semitism, so his work has been hijacked. Fifth, it doesn't answer the "Judahites aren't Jews" formula because "Ju" was used in 800s France (obviously of the Judahites) before the Khazars dissipated ca. 1016 (capture of Georgius). Sixth, "The Khazar hypothesis [is] that Ashkenazi Jews were primarily, or to a large extent, descended from converts to Judaism among the Khazars". Primarily or largely, not entirely. "Xue and others note a wholly Khazar/Turkish/Middle Eastern origin is out of the question, given the complexity of Ashkenazi admixtures." The background, and removing the "totality" aspect, are all before the merits.
"The hypothesis also postulates that after collapse of the Khazar empire, the Khazars fled to Eastern Europe and made up a large part of the Jews there", i.e. they integrated just as I said, they didn't stay separate as Khazars. The first attempt to connect Khazars in was for Johann Ewers 1808 to guess some became Varangians in the 800s and founded Kievan Rus in the late 900s (this connection seems to remain the base ever since). By 1883 Ernest Renan exaggerates this into "in all probability nothing or almost nothing that is anthropologically Jewish", still speaking relatively cautiously of course. Isidore Loeb 1885 picks up that argument with anti-miscegenation rhetoric (as if "look, we Jews are mixed-breed, you should be too"). "Jewish settlement in eastern Europe took place very early, and these rooted eastern communities readily accepted into their midst Khazars who had converted, absorbing many thousands into the Kievan empire." Karaites (not Ashkenazim) including Seraja Szapszal also wanted the fully-Khazar hypothesis applied to themselves, again to prevent anti-Semitism (and it worked among Nazis), even though "early Karaite literature speaks of Khazars as mamzerim".
Genetic and other scientific study is about what one would expect for a nonextant populace: namely, yielding numbers between 0% and 100% correlation. Therefore, a reasonable conclusion would be that Ashkenazi have some Khazar DNA and some not, and the amount is disputable. Because of the evidence that in any historic thesis the Khazars interbred with Judahites it would be rational to describe Ashkenazi as mongrelized Jews. That is, my statement they are ethnically Jews is accurate just like black Jews (American, Ethiopian, Lemba) are ethnically Jewish but mixed. Ethnically Jewish does not mean unmixed, it means pure enough in pedigree and practice to be accepted by other Jews.
Now this is Conspiracies so let's try the theoretical version. What if the Khazars were led by a satanist cabal that converted to Judaism to corrupt it? What if the cabal intended to exploit lack of records to argue the chameleon position, ethnically Jewish or non-Jewish as convenient? What if satanism were then a driving force in Ashkenazi and thereby in pressure upon Sephardi and other Jewry in time? There is no hard evidence for any of that, but we could propose it to try to understand the minds of the foaming-mouth anti-Semites. The difficulty would be that even granting that theory it still means the continuing Jewish polity still has the rights to the title "Jewish" even if its control has changed (much like Rome still has the title "Catholic"). Satanic evidence is slim, and a satanist living and dying doing nothing satanic is hardly advancing satanism; so it's more fitting to say Jews and Gentiles have occasional successful infiltrations of satanism that are historically notable. Jews still have the pre-Khazar Talmud that they cannot change one bit of, and they have the Sephardi continuous interpretation stream to contend with that has not been coopted genetically in any theory. Therefore the Christian evangelist can still appeal to individual Jews to recover their pre-Khazar heritage that cannot be hidden by any proposed Khazar mafia no matter how endemic. That heritage is, as the Christians recognized, totally prepared to receive the Jewish Messiah unless he is personally resisted. Therefore, in the most generous reading of evidence, the Jews are still sufficiently ethnically Jewish and they still have an uncorrupted pre-Khazar heritage that they can be restored to (in which case they can be evangelized to Jesus as well). So the great disputation is, as I've said, not about replacement but about influence, and influence can be undone, and that is best achieved without stumbling blocks.
One theory I would propose on the data is that when Jews are early proposing themselves as mongrels it is a natural consequence for the charge to return upon them in spades, i.e. some anti-Semitism echoes Jewish self-deprecation. Logically, whether a Jew wants to self-define as mongrel or pure, neither is an excuse for other races to self-define as mongrel, and neither is an excuse to go beyond demographics to racial hatred or collective judgment of innocent with guilty. Rather, all nations having equal rights of self-determination is a position that rises above all petty disputes.
To the rest, no evidence has been adduced that the Rabbinical Jews formally cut themselves off. There is evidence they cut off certain rabbinical partisans (including continuing proponents of Sadduceeism and some Christian heretics like tritheists), but they used plural formulas to describe God so their doctrine of plural attributes in unity never rejected proto-Trinitarianism.
And, if you know you're quoting it wrong, don't keep doing it. The theological system has none of that, and the Talmudic culture has none of that applied to Jesus but only to the stock character Yeshu who combines 3 or 4 different people of different eras. The Gittin passage has no "currently residing", no "in a cauldron", no donkey, no semen, and a view of hell that is different enough to reject that word too. The Jewish religion does not exist entirely "as opposition to Christianity", one view is that Christianity is just a Noachite pre-naturalization movement on Judaism's behalf. You know my open challenge to anyone to prove that view endemic to formal Jewish religion.
How would you like to work this issue out rather than just repeat easily dismissed tropes that you admit are incorrect?
Frens, watch out for sliding of the BAR (Birds Aren't Real).
Ethnically the same, theologically the Rabbinical branch as opposed to the Messianic branch, and not theologically opposed to Jesus but only culturally so. The entire forum has thrown its worst at the idea that legal, permitted immigration somehow changes identity, but Americans known that's not so and naturalization preserves identity; and Jews had the strictest (blood) naturalization laws. The entire forum has also thrown its worst at the idea that any congregational rabbi or rabbinical org has denied Jesus, but there is no evidence of that in straightforward English (one untraceable Hebrew dubbed clip has been put forward). I invite them to keep trying.
It seems a very effective Christian exorcism. If a person cannot say Jesus's name and acknowledge he self-identified as a Jew, he has the wrong Jesus and he runs from proof of the true Jesus. It's not about convincing them at this point, it's about identifying them by holding up a crucifix and seeing the predictable flight. IMHO the lurkers are being convinced that these folks are all in the same easily identified class. That's how exorcism works, fren.
Thank you for playing. You're losing the new games too.
Worship the One Jew. The real Jesus is a Jew and King of the Jews. You deny Jesus every time you deflect from him.
Worship the One Jew. The real Jesus is a Jew and King of the Jews. You deny Jesus every time you deflect from him.
There is no organic branch of Christianity in which any other human is the second coming of Christ. The Reich "church" redefined "Positive Christianity" in terms the church universally agrees are cultic, rejecting Jesus being the Son of God. Now you've lost whatever credibility you had by pretending to be Christian. You are of the apostolate of satan that Jesus prophesied about in the words "them which are evil ... them which say they are apostles, and are not ... liars" (Rev. 2:2).