1
supermario2360 1 point ago +1 / -0

Very true! It divides the earth equally, I get that. It can be true for both a sphere or flat earth. Some of the equations explaining the globe also can explain the flat earth. Not trying to persuade anybody... Just thinking outside the box of modern "science" that has duped us so many times: Vaccine, fluoridated water, chemtrails, global warming, GMO foods with roundup, safe levels of lead and other carcinogens in water, transgenderism, GMO mosquito's, government tests on populations, etc. And a lot of it spins off of mythology and occult practices and beliefs. Kinda gotta be skeptical at least to some degree. Until the next "breakthrough" or new way of thinking comes, and even then, gotta question it.

3
supermario2360 3 points ago +3 / -0

Science can't fully explain what god created so maybe there is a different reason for the different spin of water for the earth above and below the equator. A quick google shows differing opinions. Some science shills say yes and others say no. There may be some " I gotchas" supporting the globe but maybe there is more information that is suppressed. Or the earth could be a sphere. There are also " I gotchas" supporting a flat earth. One thing for sure is I don't trust NASA, a governmental agency with a questionable history and questionable employees.

8
supermario2360 8 points ago +8 / -0

Not to be mean but making earth a small spinning ball in space makes humans seem insignificant in the grand scheme of things. The Lord God allowed the earth to be made encompassed by a firmament that shows His handywork. We are a angels that came from Heaven with free will in our flesh suits and we have to come back to the Lord God. He knew us before we were human. Hollywood make propaganda to deceive us and put us on the wrong path. I think it's important, but that's just me...

3
supermario2360 3 points ago +3 / -0

Looks like an arts and crafts project XD. Foil and construction paper. Also the shadows go different directions.

1
supermario2360 1 point ago +1 / -0

Weird because if the sun is a sphere then light would be emanating in all directions anyways... And if the sun is very close to us then crepuscular rays work... If the sun is far away then people say its the atmosphere making the rays diverge. Both ways can explain it, but which is correct? I've never been high up enough to see for myself. The NASA masons tell us they have and show us compositions (edited photos) and videos but I'm skeptical

1
supermario2360 1 point ago +1 / -0

The atmosphere can have effects on light but what about a flashlight's focused beam even though the light is traveling through the atmosphere? It can be observed that the beam follows a narrow path with little to no effects from atmosphere besides fading over a distance of the earth.

4
supermario2360 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yup, crepuscular rays demonstrate that.. If the sun was so far away, the rays would be parallel; the rays diverge from the point of the sun and are not parallel.

1
supermario2360 1 point ago +2 / -1

NASA is infiltrated with many masons. NASA is a government agency. Government has a bad track record of not telling the truth. How did we lose the ability to go to the moon when modern day technology is orders of magnitude more advanced than 1960's tech? Their story doesn't add up...

0
supermario2360 0 points ago +1 / -1

I now know that their is little if any value when interacting with individuals like yourself. I asked why do you think the op is a bot and all that has happened is you nitpicked and insulted me. Such a fruitful conversation.

0
supermario2360 0 points ago +1 / -1

Well then... I am corrected. I now have little motivation to seek an answer from yourself.

1
supermario2360 1 point ago +1 / -0

Understood. I know the bible was written after the events took place. I also know that many of the people involved in NASA are Freemasons. Well I guess we'll have to leave it at a stalemate.

0
supermario2360 0 points ago +1 / -1

Why you say that?

-1
supermario2360 -1 points ago +1 / -2

Technically the current heliocentric understanding is that the earth is an oblate spheroid... The heliocentric and geocentric mathematical formulas both can explain the earth, sun and moon. The bible refers to a firmament separating our waters from the waters above (Hebrews consider it as a solid supporting the waters above). And the sun, moon and stars being in the expanse of the firmament. Heliocentrism apparently didn't catch on till ~500 years ago. NASA is a government agency and the government has proven time and time again that it isn't trustworthy. Just food for thought.

0
supermario2360 0 points ago +1 / -1

Apparently it takes 1.25 seconds for a photon from the earth to reach the moon. I'm not a scientist but wouldn't it take a lot of power to send that signal through the atmosphere, protective radiation belts and firmament while retaining signal integrity and quality? And on top of that sending signals back through all of that mess while directing it to a specific location?

by pkvi
1
supermario2360 1 point ago +3 / -2

One would think with such advancements in technology, materials, computing, "science", etc, it would be much easier and efficient to go to the moon. Our smart phones are orders of magnitude more complex (let alone personal computers) and yet we can't figure it out... Hmm....

2
supermario2360 2 points ago +2 / -0

Xbox communications across the earth can be near 1 second one way... So communications going through the atmosphere and van Allen belt and much further have nearly the same amount of lag?

3
supermario2360 3 points ago +3 / -0

Makes you think... At least I hope it does. A lot of what is fed to us as truth is lies and it helps to scrutinize. Just like Joe Biden is the president... Just like chemtrails. Just like haarp. Just like fluoridated water. Be as wise as a serpent!

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›