▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is the first part of the tweet mischaracterizing what is happening? It says they are missing work as a protest. Isn't it more correct that they are missing work because they are ineligible to fly as a result of not taking the jab?

Seriously, I have no idea what is happening there because of lies in the news coverage.

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

Aaron Swartz would be proud.

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

When they went after the comedians...

▲ 2 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 2 points ago +2 / -0

That is not my view. I think the pharmaceutical companies were completely fine, perhaps even happy to see the election stolen. Trump has spoken about witnessing a terrible fever after a toddler got an MMR shot that rendered it permanently damaged. Also, the new US one-party faction could have easily made promises to those companies that can not be fulfilled under a two-party system. That said, I don't think they were the ones who initiated or orchestrated the steal.

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

An online repository of these places, each with coordinates, photos, directions to get there, local information (nearby villages, water, things to be careful of, etc.) and attempts to organize groups to explore.

▲ 2 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 2 points ago +2 / -0

In the United States, a vast network including the Intelligence Community, unelected officials, governmental appointees, government insiders, political party leaders, military officers, law enforcement and other powerful groups. Big Pharma certainly wields enormous power in America, but I don't think they were the primary motivators for rigging the 2020 election.

▲ 2 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 2 points ago +2 / -0

It seems to me that the conspiracy is to increase the power of government and corporations so that they gain power over people's personal choices. This documents resistance.

by pkvi
▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

People can decide who sounds like what.

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

The official story is that a large amount of those building materials were papier-mâché which could be mixed with the water available on-site.

My point was that theoretically the time it took to build the most-time consuming building is the time it would take to build all of them because you can build them all at the same time. The materials and logistics are another matter.

▲ 3 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 3 points ago +3 / -0

Most of what you are writing is not only wrong, but entirely illogical to the point of being completely backwards.

▲ 2 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 2 points ago +2 / -0

You have a lot of pretty massive lies here, so I don't even have time you show you how wrong you are.

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

But I thought it was because of a mandatory 48-hour rest period after taking the jab. Surely they would not have lied about this.

by pkvi
▲ 2 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is enormously important. The U.S. has troops in Taiwan that were previously secretly deployed.

Check the article as well as the short embedded video clips within it if you would like to learn more about this issue.

https://www.politico.com/newsletters/national-security-daily/2021/10/07/lawmakers-end-strategic-ambiguity-toward-taiwan-494626

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wait, the title is taking attention away from the good parts.

First, Fauci is talking about new methods that will make vaccines much cheaper to manufacture and likely safer. That's what Project Warp Speed was partially about.

Second, the other person is talking about getting an RNA sequence from China beamed to homes, printed on a patch to self-administer. Think of that. A vaccine on a patch based on an RNA sequence that can be sent digitally.

by pkvi
▲ 2 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 2 points ago +2 / -0

So are we over the lie that the shortage was due to a mandatory 48-hour rest period after the employees take the jab?

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

TL;DR These forms are not to help you but to put you on a list.

I have a personal story. At university I went to the student health center to see about a minor issue. (This is where I learned that even though students pay for it, and I paid extra for insurance to be seen there, the place was really for MMR vaccines (without paperwork of any sort), sexual health, administering rape kits and not much else.)

The clinician noticed I looked sad so asked me about it. I confided that I was experiencing a bout of depression and then that person asked me if I was looking for pills. This seemed odd to me because I had not undergone any sort of medical evaluation. I said that my sadness was due to life circumstances and probably not related to an underlying chemical imbalance.

It was then that I was given a form like you described. I made the decision to reach out for help. Someone close to me was battling drug addiction and had just been given serious jail time and fines for it. One of the questions was worded something like, "Are you or is someone you know having a substance abuse issue?" I answered yes and it went on to ask which substance. I wrote down a particularly hard drug.

I naively thought they would refer me to a support group or at least give me some information. They had absolutely zero interest in helping me. The following week, the demeaner of two of my professors toward me became noticeably negative. A few days later, someone in another department who was previously quite amicable literally glared at me when I came to the office. It was a minor administrative task concerning my upcoming graduation. The person seemed so angry at me during the entire process; I wondered what would prompt such unprofessional behavior.

Then it clicked. Just a couple of years previously, I was asked to help sort surveys for the school of social work. Nothing was done to sanitize the data and I realized that I was literally seeing the sexual histories of people I recognized.

I believe the form was used to place me on a watch list given to university faculty of people at risk of going on a shooting spree or pushing drugs onto other students. These people were assuming I was a drug addict because of my answers on the psychological evaluation form.

▲ 2 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 2 points ago +2 / -0

This seems obvious to anyone paying attention to the media. The crucial thing to note is that a significant portion of society thinks this is completely okay.

by pkvi
▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

I would not be so sure it's the Mossad. Surely they know that despite any attempt to ensure that people witness antisemitism, some will be influenced to dislike the Jews as a people as a result and that could endure for years to come.

EDIT: Further, the phenomenon I am talking about is recent. It is a daily thing now, and that is why it looks so fake to me. Even your comment I am replying to is doing this. Therefore, to me you are one of the fakes trying to falsely depict us as being antisemites.

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

It is an attempted genocide against those people.

You can check the country metadata file here https://github.com/owid/covid-19-data/blob/master/public/data/vaccinations/locations.csv

If you casually look down the list, a large number of African nations only have access to Oxford/AstraZeneca and there is surely not enough to go around.

EDIT: Here's in image of a chart of the countries with low rates, with the bottom half showing very low rates.

https://ibb.co/SBMBmMd

Now go watch CNN for a while and watch them try and persuade people to travel to these places.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›