▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Olympics transcend politics. Politcal issues like genocide, slavery, rape and organ harvesting. It's just politics.

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

I would like information about this. Has Justin Trudeau played the racism card against truck drivers?

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

u/turtlebam is a shill. That account exists to support the idea that conspiracy forums, and to a lesser degree open discourse in general, are full of antisemitism. The comment I am referring to addresses a particular issue that came up last year.

Some watchdog groups have labelled the idea that Israel is suffering disproportionately high COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations and deaths as an antisemitic conspiracy theory. Naturally, a significant number of reasonable people would push back against this. How could citing these statistics be a tool of antisemites? If anything that would bring sympathy to the Israelis, not scorn.

The people who want universal Internet censorship to be the law (not the Jews) need shills to go in and explain just how this is so. Yes, it's done with idiotic arguments, but gets the point across.

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

Satanists can be right about things.

That notwithstanding, how is that in defence of any model?

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wait, can you site an elected representative who has called for the burning of a church?

Also, I have not heard of a wave church (or masonic lodge) burnings during the pandemic. I'm not disputing it, but this should be pretty big news.

by pkvi
▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

Check what the word flimsy means. It does not mean skinny.

Once you do that, you will see that this is total garbage, because the flimsiness of a door has nothing to do with the process going on inside a building. I have been to plenty of factories with "flimsy doors." Ones with glass panes too. It is totally stupid to argue this.

Even if it were true to a degree, no small detail like that can bring the entire mountain of evidence crashing down.

What we are talking about is the application of industrial efficiency to mass murder.

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks for verifying that this is over the target with that idiotic comment.

▲ 2 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 2 points ago +2 / -0

Think of how many people think this reporting should not exist because of their stupid politics?

Injecting kids with the wrong stuff. The emptied gift cards. Too many doses for countless people. Such a unethical idea executed so poorly and managed so negligently. This is like something out of a corrupt dictatorship.

by pkvi
▲ 2 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 2 points ago +2 / -0

China is much worse than you are allowed to see.

by pkvi
▲ 4 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 4 points ago +4 / -0

The Daily Beast is poison.

by pkvi
▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

An anagram here is:

Abbott Costella mRNAP

by pkvi
▲ 2 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 2 points ago +2 / -0

I believe the shots were largely an attempt to make the disease evolve to become more deadly. This still may happen, but it seems the shots are too ineffective to keep a person incubating a deadly variant alive.

Another, completely different scenario is we have good intel that germ warfare/biological weapon research has successfully created engineered viruses that utilize the spike protein and attempts to block it and create a framework to rapidly deploy new blocking mechanisms based on mRNA (Operation Warp Speed) were really about preparing for this.

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

We need more verifiable source material from the UK side of things.

by pkvi
▲ 2 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 2 points ago +2 / -0

Learn from the tragedy of Hong Kong.

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

The manufacture of votes you are talking about can be seen using statistical methods and isn't guaranteed to work. They would much prefer it if the actual turnout was in their favor.

Please disregard attempts by u/ImBillCurtis to discourage you from voting as you see fit. In fact, the more I see this stuff as we approach the U.S. elections, the more I am going to encourage Americans to turn out to vote.

by Xeil2
▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

This place SUCKS for discussion

I beg to differ.

Anyway, here is what I was talking about. The following is a repeatable experiment. The hardest part is actually keeping the people who are in on it from laughing during the experiment.

Asch conformity experiments https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asch_conformity_experiments

The majority of people are innocently following along with what the rest of the herd appears to be doing. A big part of the trick is deceiving people into thinking a faked herd is behaving in a specific way. That is yet another reason why we're overrun with shills everywhere.

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

UPDATED WITH COMMENTS FROM Dr. Monica Gandhi, who says the story and original headline did not reflect her views on mRNA vaccines

COMMENTS FROM DR. MONICA GANDHI AT END OF ARTICLE: https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/dr-monica-gandhi-is-done-with-the/comments

Notes from a (short) interview with Dr. Gandhi that followed the original publication of this story (which was headlined “Dr. Monica Gandhi is done with the mRNA vaccines":

Dr. Gandhi repeatedly said the story and especially the headline did not reflect her views.

Dr. Gandhi declined to participate in a Q&A [as I offered] or explain why she had not mentioned the possibility of boosting with the mRNA vaccines or any other specifics in her newsletter post. She also declined to say if she thought more mRNA boosters were appropriate for the general population. She said she had received many emails about the original post.

Her direct quotes:

“I’m not done with mRNA vaccines.”

“I think Dr. Graham [Barney Graham, who helped developed the vaccines at the National Institutes of Health] should win the Nobel Prize.”

“I think they’re fantastic vaccines.”

“It’s silly to write that.”

“I think they are really safe and effective vaccines.”

by Xeil2
▲ 2 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm aware of metaphoric use of the term, but even in that case the vast majority of people do what they do because they see others doing it.

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am talking about organisms living inside people.

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

Who are you going to kill? You. Not people you are cowardly trying to convince to do it.

So, this is a clear case of you who would never, ever hurt anyone telling other people to do it. Who do you think people other than yourself need to kill?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›