OP once more demonstrates his lack of understanding the difference between CBDC, stablecoin and BTC.
BTC is not backed by dollars or any other currency. I can pay and get paid in BTC for services and use zero federal currency in the process.
It is, but it's anonymous (wallet address only present) and accessible by everyone (open source). This is only made possible by the blockchain at this scale.
Also I hear about lots of paper Bitcoin millionaires but I don't know anyone who cashed out and bought land or a mansion via Bitcoin wealth.
And if no one is really cashing out and there isnt much regular day important commerce utilizing the bitcoins then it seems more the pyramid scheme
The reason they're not cashing out is because BTC value will only rise in the future due to scarcity and more widespread adoption. The old coiners sell a bit to cover their costs and live comfortably but that wont make the news.
That's correct! We can't know for sure anything. We can only assume. We've been indoctrinated almost 24/7 for all our lives. This we know of.
That's a contradiction. If you can't know anything for sure, you can't know this for sure either. If everything is possibly fake and gay indoctrination, how do you know the belief that everything is fake is not a product of indoctrination also?
In philosophy this is called epistemic nihilism - the inability to know anything and thus the inability to make any arguments and truth statements at all. It's a self-defeating position that reduces to absurdity.
That's a good question actually. So, your assumption is that only official Church has the monopoly on truth. Ok, which one? Catholic? What about Orthodox? Which one of those is correct?
Yes, there is only one apostolic Church that was established by Christ. It's head is Christ Himself and the Church is His body - it's not a man-made institution. It is defined by uninterrupted apostolic succession and unchanging teachings and practices throughout history. The only Church that meets this criteria would be the Eastern Orthodox.
The Church has a monopoly on truth because the Truth is Christ Himself: "I am the way, the truth and the light. No one comes to the Father except through me." Just because there are many options and perspectives, it doesn't mean the truth isn't one and that it can't be known.
But even Bible is not something that simply appeared in its current form. It was compiled relatively recently from various texts by various authors. Different confessions have different canons. Which one is the correct one? Catholic, Protestant, maybe Ethiopian one? And what about apocrypha? Why some texts were included and some weren't? Who exactly do we trust on this?
Exactly, so how do you know who Jesus was and what was His teaching. You're just proving my point. You're denying any authority (be it a historical Church or the Bible itself) and yet hold some view about Christ that is based on the information that got to us via that tradition.
You see, everything a human hand touches is marred by lies, omissions, half-truths and whatnot. We cannot trust anything coming from human beings. There is no sure way to determine what is true and what is not. That's just how it is in this sorry world.
Then you can't have any knowledge apart from empirical knowledge of things you witnessed yourself (and even then you have to trust your senses and evaluation).
As other commenter has already stated, I think this is probably meant as a whole body of all believers. Not some particular institution with some particular people a the helm, but the whole collective of Christian believers.
That just pushes the problem of authority down further down the road. Even if I grant you that the Church is "the body of all believers" and not a historical institution established by Christ and guided by the Holy Spirit, it begs the same question I asked you: Where do they get their beliefs from? Believers in what exactly?
Exactly. Guys like Rogan, Tate, Brand and Fuentes are plants. Nobody knows how and why they got famous and how they got their sizable operations going. One day nobody has heard them and a week later they have gone viral. Reminds me of how Jeff Epstein was a sub teacher and next thing you know he's making it big on Wall Str and hangs out with Prince Andrew, Bill Gates, Les Wexner and the daughter of a Mossad director. It's a very suspicious pattern.
Yeah, they are cooked. They fined people for not getting the covid shot and recently legalized gay marriages.
Yes. The whole "alt-right" takeover is manufactured. There are very few legitimate personalities out there and they don't get to the level AJ, Russel Brand or Nick get to.
I think it's a good strategic move to flood the mainstream with various theories that ultimately distract people from what's truly important at the moment - the AI control smart grid, Digital ID and CBDC. Everything else serves as a distraction, even if it is a legitimate conspiracy.
Their strategy is to overwhelm people with info and to create more chaos. They don't mind getting out in the open at this point and admitting that conspiracy theorists were right in the past. The veil is being pulled away and people are being initiated into the inner workings of the regime. I think this is deliberate.
They brought conspiracy theories into the mainstream where they fully control the narratives, creating false dialectics. Gotta give it to them - this is a 4D chess move.
Truly the only Get Rich Quick scheme that's not a scam... Just sell your soul to Satan, goy.
Sheeple is as sheeple does. Can't help them really. I don't even discuss politics with my normie friends anymore.
How do you have knowledge of what true Christianity is or who the Christian God is then? It's most likely the Bible, right? But the Bible was composed and passed on by the traditional Christian institution (the Church) that you have distrust in.
According to scripture, Christ Himself affirms the authority of that institution (the Church being His body) and sends the Holy Spirit to His apostles, so that they can evangelize all around the world and grow His Church which will exist until the end of times.
I don't see two factions really. The reason they installed Biden and Kamala, who are absolutely ridiculous choice for presidential candidates even by clown world standards, was to make Trump more appealing. Anyone who's paying attention to the big picture will notice that tptb use both parties (both sides of the dialectic) to further their agenda.
As long as people root for one or the other party, they will cheer when their team wins, even if the actual win has nothing to do with the supposed platform of the party even a few years ago due to Overton window.
This process was described in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. It's nothing new really, this is how politics is ran ever since the freemasonic revolutions of the Enlightenment 250 years ago.
Freemasons are not pagan. They are Luciferian illuminists following the ancient traditions of Kabbala and Egyptian and hermetic mysteries.
No one comes to stardom level in this world without being one of them. This is especially true in the world of politics, media and entertainment.
The photo above is full of their symbolism:
-
She covers her eye symbolizing the all-seeing eye at the top of the pyramid - this is the most well-known symbol and even some normies may think it looks weird.
-
The crystal ball is an upside-down bent mirror - the mirror symbolizes the psyche and mind control;
-
She has a tear in her other eye most likely symbolizing the loss of innocence after initiation in the cabal
There are probably more but those are the most obvious. They communicate using symbols, gestures and code words.
He's playing a part. He turned heel recently, much like Hulk Hogan famously did in WWE lore. Politicians are actors.
Jews are having a field day with goyim as gullible and distracted by their media cycle and pop culture. They are handling children at this point (pun intended) - the infantilization and dumbification of the goyim has been a thorough success.
that would mean like good, evil also always existed. Evil having the attribute of always existing?
No, by "evil is uncreated" I meant it doesn't have ontological exitance because God created everything and it was all good. The Church fathers explain evil as the privation of the good, similar to how darkness is the absence of light. Evil and death entered the world as a result of the fall of Adam. God the Son assumed human nature (becoming the second Adam) and healed it by defeating death itself (resurrection and harrowing of hades), giving us the path to salvation and eternal life in the Kingdom of God.
The enemy can't create. Satan and his demons are mere created angels and have no real power because all power comes from God. God created man to be above the angels. This is why Satan got envious and went after man in the first place. All the enemy has is lies but as we can see, lies go a long way in this fallen world.
Strawmen galore. It's pointless to even address all of them. I never said I support any current regime's censorship because I think they are all bad. There are no true Christian states anymore. But if you knew history, you'd know there were such states in the past and they did enforce censorship including jailing heretics and burning dangerous books. States like the Byzantine Empire which was the longest lasting empire in the world. You'd call such states tyrannical no doubt.
This was much before the masonic US with it's liberal democratic (jewish) principles you're so found of was established so I understand your ignorance.
Ok, here comes theology 101.
God created everything good, right? He created the angels in His own image, meaning they like us have free will. They used their free will to rebel against God and fell away from Him, becoming demons. Thus they divorced themselves from God who is life and condemned themselves to the lake of fire (which is how they experience God's presence or absence depending on interpretation).
God doesn't create evil. Evil is uncreated and the logical result of free will.
I see no evidence the masons had any involvement with it.
Are you sure it doesn't remind you of a certain Statue of Liberty? Just say you have no clue what freemasonry is about. I'm not saying freemasons built it.
CCP did not do it because of moral goodness, but because of worldview clash.
Yes.
CCP wrecking an object does nothing to justify their mass killings.
Indeed.
Title was ironic. CCP is obviously not based but them tearing down the freemasonic statue is ironically based.
So you'll ignore it? I can't engage with all the points, I have other shit to do. We could be going in the weeds for eternity. I picked out the meta ones that allow me to explain why your underlying classical liberal framework is wrong and why it's incompatible with Christianity.
You just copied your previous reply, dude.
Dude, I can't keep up with the long replies so I will go short.
Yup, monopoly on info. And guess what, they are EXCLUDING (think, censoring) contrary viewpoints. You are literally STEEL-MANNING my case. It's not even 8 replies between us in this specific reply chain, yet your ideas are already being torn in the Marketplace.
I'm steel-manning your position about better ideas getting on top by pointing out people are easily deceived by propaganda and disinfo which are used to promote bad ideas? Does that make sense to you?
You fail to take into account that there are evil secret elite with great power (in multiple sense of the word) & $ intentionally unfairly rigging the scales.
But wait, I thought there was a free market of ideas? Now suddenly it's not so free?
Yes, good point. There's no perfect airtight solution in cryptography and there never will be. I was a BTC hater for a long time and wanted it to burst badly. It didn't though and I got wiser and started stacking - it's never too late. I used to stack gold and still hold it but at this point I'm convinced BTC is the best asset there is and I'm willing to go all in on it. I believe owning BTC will be crucial in the decades to come.
Thanks. You should read C.S. Lewis's That Hideous Strength if you haven't. It came a couple of years before 1984 and is every bit as relevant today. Just like Orwell, Lewis personally knew the circle of people he was writing about and used fiction to expose their agenda.