As if he's the one pulling the strings and not a compromised jewish puppet. Pray for a plague to strike down the clandestine world government comprised of 300 jews under Rothschild. Wars and calamities will never cease until they are dealt with.
Because the question assumed I had a specific photo in mind and that I wasn't sure if it's altered or not.
Why ask me for an exact photo when you have all the info I have by looking at the AI reply I pasted?
How did I accuse you with a question that doesn't have anything connected to what you're saying?
Why would you reply something completely unconnected to begin with? Why not reply to the thread or make another one instead? Your comment was out of place and I viewed it in context.
666 was Nero.
Says who? Did Nero call himself that or did you learn that from Revelation where John used that code to point to Nero and Satan?
Nothing in the bible was written by anyone who "witnessed" the person that may have been a first century "messiah" (there were many, look it up)
How do you know that? Did you learn it on History Channel?
John and Peter were apostles. So we have Gospel of John, Revelation and their epistles.
Go on, you are hilarious. Those boosters really fried your brain (or maybe it was fried from the get go if you really took the jab and still defend it).
Satanist? Weird...jump to conclusions... Nothing biblical about it
Yeah, weird to conclude Mephisto666 is somehow satanic. Mephistopheles is totally not based on Satan and the number of the beast has nothing to do with John's Revelation. You may reject Christianity but our civilization is built around it.
SV40 was not in any Covid injections. It was last injected into a human in 1963 with the polio vaccines, and eradicated after that.
Sure it was.
Did you really send me a factcheck.org link to deboonk me? "Credible source" lol, I missed the days we had shills here. Thank you for making my day.
Your life is a lie, but you go ahead and live it.
How ironic. You're the one who is named after the father of lies and who rejects the ultimate Truth in the person of Christ. No wonder you toll the NWO psychopathic transhumanist propaganda line. But you won't have much luck here. Go back to normieland.
Sure dude, I'm way past arguing about this stuff. The unprecedented 20% increase in cancer diagnoses among young people has nothing to do with the SV40 promoter (same virus that polio vaccines were "contaminated" with) that was found in the vaccines by Kevin McKernan way back in 2022: https://x.com/Humanspective/status/1910574382050877882 https://x.com/DrJackKruse/status/1894075913874411525/photo/1
As for 5G, there are studies showing the detrimental effects of EMF. I don't think it was instrumental in the pandemic but it could amplify some of the effects.
There is no such thing as "turbo cancer" except in your conspiracy addled mind.
You're in the wrong place. This is not reddit. Gtfo with this "Correlation does not equal Causation" midwit crap. You sound like a damn NPC.
PS: Satanist larpers are not welcome here.
Wow dude, you just run your script and don't even try to understand where people are coming from (which would be obvious if you took a step back and red my initial comment).
All I did in this thread was to prompt the AI with the same question to see what it would answer. I then pasted the answer here. I wasn't arguing for or against the veracity of the photos (the claim) but wanted to see if the AI really did answer that way. Then you and the other new age flerf guy wrongfully concluded I was somehow defending the claim made by the model and felt the need to convince me otherwise.
The initial wave of infections were much worse than what came later.
No it wasn't. People were under mind control and their immune system was cooked. They stayed at home under constant anxiety so no vit D and high levels of cortisol. Then there was the 5g. Then they got lung-raped by ventilators and got poisoned with extremely toxic drugs. Later on, Italy disclosed that over 80% of people in the hospitals in the first wave died due to bacterial infections and not the coof.
Furthermore, most of the casualties early on were geriatrics with diabetes, cancer and heart disease - people who run a significant risk of any flu-like illness. After the vaxx there were plenty of young and healthy people who got myocarditis, turbo cancer and died suddenly.
Stop the reddit-tier disinfo dude, it's not 2021. The gene shots were the weapon and the coof itself was a gmo flu (if it existed at all). It was an obvious psy op.
I'm no atheist, but I know the idea of god and especially Jesus are totally planted psy ops for self policing population in the west.
Good job getting brainwashed by jewish propaganda that's 2000 years old. You're right where they want you - away from Christ and totally confused by new age bs, mind broken by all the psy ops to the extent you believes everything is fake, except your own subjective inner truth and spirituality, because you're your own god and you don't need no man made traditions.
But I know, I used to be a globe loving christian, vax taking, voting, isreal supporting, history buff and arm chair scientists too.
Sorry to break it to you but you weren't much of a Christian if you supported Israel. Just because you rejected one false worldview and went to another one doesn't put you in a better position.
Are those the gifts of knowing the earth is flat?
Oh no, jews want to prevent the youth from getting mk-ultra'd and desensitized to violence, porn and debauchery? Wait, they push all those things and screech against decency laws and censorship of degeneracy which all decent and normal people agree with.
Basically, you're doing their bidding. You're a good shabbos goy.
That's very jewish of you. You interject with a snarky disrespectful comment and then cry about me being disrespectful?
You must be fuuuuun to be around...
You sound like a 10-year old girl. I don't have time for daycare.
Again, suppose I do the measurements and come to the conclusion that the earth is flat - what will that prove? I already know that what we are taught about the world and the scientific facts that we're programed to believe are not to be taken for granted and that the paradigm they presuppose is false.
I have a worldview that's not contingent on scientific or even human knowledge so my programming must be pretty bad. I think you got me mixed up with the normies you debate this stuff with.
For example, I will live my life exactly the same no matter what shape the Earth was. But I most definitely would hold different beliefs if I took atheism, materialism and darwinism for granted (basically following the programming) and it will influence me greatly.
Yes I get it but my point was I already know that darwinism and mainstream anthropology, dinosaurs, deep history, cosmology is fake and gay and people are being conditioned to believe in lies on a massive scale. The flerf pitch that you compulsively regurgitated here has no effect on me because I already know how their propaganda lie machine works and know perfectly well what the NWO is about. So again, why do I need flerf theory to prove something I already know through other methods? Even if you were to convince me the earth was flat here and now, that wouldn't change my worldview one bit. I will say "there goes another lie they made up". This is why I told you I don't care and it's unimportant. But unlike darwinism and anthropology the shape of the earth has no real significance in itself and they just made up globe theory for no good reason at all except just to lie for the sake of it. This is dumb. Lying is a mean not an end.
What I never understood about this strange obsession (and totally grass roots movement that is not a CIA psy op like Q-anon) is why the earth being flat is the most crucial point of this and not other fake "science" we've been fed? Is it because it sounds the most ridiculous and they want normies to laugh off all other claims about massive conspiracies and faked science by association?
You can buy stuff using BTC and the government will be non the wiser. This is why BTC is preferred in the criminal world.
An extra step i don't worry about with gold, since selling it is something the government never finds out about.
But you also convert gold to cash when you want to purchase something so what's your point? The government knows either way because they will notice a new car or a property on your name and ask where the money came from.
bitcoin is replaceable. Any digital currency can replace it.
That's meaningless. Any sufficiently rare metal or rock could replace gold too. BTC has a market cap of over 2 trillion and is widely adopted. It is limited supply. It is a huge decentralized p2p network. Sure, you can replace it with some other crypto that can rival this.
Bitcoin is public ledger. It's not private. Every transaction is recorded
That's a pro, not a con because it prevents manipulation of the ledger (like banks and governments would do in their "private" ledgers). Transactions are still anonymous. All that is recorded is the wallet hash which is not necessarily tied to real ID.
No one actually uses bitcoins as an actual fucking currency. Retards just get bitcoins and sit on them.
It is used, even by whole governments like El Salvador. If you think Blackrock is retarded then yes, they buy BTC as an asset and use it as a storage of value and a hedge against inflation.
bitcoin transactions will infinitely become more and more cumbersome to process as the ledger grows.
It won't. Technology will alleviate this. Most BTC transactions will be in satoshis. Still more convenient than using gold coins and ingots like in the good ol pirate days.
bitcoin is stuck between $100K and $110K. Gold and silver are outperforming it this year.
Cherry picking a specific timeframe after BTC has climbed, dipped and recovered doesn't prove anything. It will probably pass 200k by the end of the year in the next bull run. Here's the actual stats: https://www.longtermtrends.net/bitcoin-vs-gold/
Comparing BTC to gold in terms of appreciation is laughable - in the past 10 years BTC grew 46k% or by 146% per year. Gold grew 212% or by 12% per year. But take any timeframe you want. Even the last year BTC grew 90% vs gold - 39%. Six months BTC is still on top of gold.
Gold has been around thousands of years and maintained value.
It's a fallacy to assume that it will continue in the future. Monarchies have been around for as much time as gold and yet they were replaced. Gold as currency is a technology of the past that can't fulfill the needs of a digital globalized world as currency. It couldn't do it even 100 years ago and this is why it got replaced by fiat in the first place.
Bitcoin has lasted about 10 years and will only last so long as a superior digital coin is not developed.
I imagine people said the same thing about the combustible engine. Everything can be replaced by a superior technology and gold has already been replaced by fiat. How long it will last is a speculation.
I'm saying all this as not to hate on gold but as a realist. I stack it myself and believe there is intrinsic value in its beauty, timelessness and symbolism.
All I know is that it's good to be financially independent and anyone who bought a few dirt cheap BTCs back in the day has enough money to never be bothered about it in their lifetime and can spend a little to pay for their expenses. You call them retards but any objective person, who's not envious would call them smart investors. Sadly I missed that train because I used to think like you but it's never too late because I'm pretty convinced BTC will play a huge role in the future (not as CBDC but as its alternative).
There is - BTC.
I recommend the book The Bitcoin Standard: The Decentralized Alternative to Central Banking
That won't resolve the main problem, which is centralization of currency. They will still hold most of the gold and be able to manipulate its value. Just like they did in the beginning of the XXc - there was a reason why Rotschild and the Milner group were in favor of the gold standard.
Exactly, the shape of the Earth is not a big deal to me. Of course NASA is fake and gay (Jack Parsons was). I care more about the talmudic NWO and the darwinian scam for example.
No, you were a dick to me because you thought I was here to deboonk OP's claim. Don't try to reframe it, come on.
You do understand that I was being sarcastic, right?
Obviously I did and I called you out. But go tell your mom you got me good.
Wow another dumbass.
I checked to see if the image was faked and yes it was. I wouldn't call that research. This doesn't mean the claim on the image is not true. Can you think bro?
Wtf are you on about? Can you read, dude? I don't care about any of this flerf shit - all I said is I got that reply when I prompted the model.
Again, are you fucking stupid or yes?
Oh, so you don't hold any beliefs? Like belief in your senses and in your reason?
ALL religions are man-made control mechanisms.
Is that assertion a belief or you know it as a brute fact somehow? Kinda like a dogma?
Had you any knowledge of philosophy (and epistemology in particular), you'd know believing is a prerequisite for knowledge (JTB theory of knowledge).
For example for me to know A is the case:
- A needs to be true
- I have to believe A is true
- I have to justify my belief of A being true.
Edit: What could possibly lead one to have a 'belief' that the 'one true all-knowing, loving god' would send 'his one and only son' into a pack of bronze-age illiterate goat-hearding jews, and that his 'sole purpose' was to be 'sacrificed as a human' so that all the rest of the humans could be 'saved' from original sin by being 'spiritually washed in his blood'? The mental gymnastics that are required for this are at Olga Korbut levels.
Maybe. What's your standard for determining this to be false? What's your alternative grand-narrative and how did you verify it?
Just as I was expecting you spouted normie-tier level stuff. I hope it's just an age thing because I used to say things like that in my early 20's thinking it was deep.
I don't care. I just pointed out the model didn't reply with No.
I just wrote what the model replied which is not what OP suggested. I didn't say I believe it.
How are people here so stupid?
Dude, I wasn't Christian for the better part of my life. I've red tons of philosophy books and did much introspection and soul-searching before I came to my current belief. It is not blind faith and I can comfortably argue for it and why it is the only truly reasonable and logically consistent position that can explain and provide justification for our reality. You don't know me and don't know what you're talking about so stop playing shrink.
But do tell, what is your worldview? What is your standard for what's good? I take it it's totally genuine and you're not subject to the things you accuse me of. But I'd be surprised if your position is not regurgitated old gnostic heresies that have been resurrected by the freemasons (jews) and popularized by the new age movement - as all antichristian ideas virtually are.
But you realize I'm not one of those people and you reply to me, not some abstract "other people", correct? So what am I to think in this case? It's reasonable to contextualize what you wrote the way I did.
It didn't help that your reply came right after the other guy saying "Omg, you're a gullible idiot" implying I agree with the AI.
Very gracious of you and nice try at gaslighting. You were the one who insulted me first though, unless you consider "I don't care" to be an insult. It seems you just had another one of those interactions you talk about, but you don't seem ashamed of it.
You had an opportunity to do so here but chose to act as if you have the moral high ground somehow. It's bizarre really.
But yes, it was a misunderstanding that didn't need to devolve into insults, I give you that. I'm sorry I stooped to your level and i apologize.