Real tragedies are not as explicit and shocking as seen in the movies: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LNU01076960 Deaths aside, the implication of so much disabled young people are horrendous for our future.
Yes they have. Thrombocytopenia and blood clotting was acknowledged as a side effect since 2021. Even the CDC had to include it on their stupid site and that was the explicit reason to discontinue AZ vaccination in most countries and not consider them for boosters.
I was told progress in medicine will make people healthier and increase longevity and quality of life. Why are things going in the opposite direction?
They'd rationalize it differently and jump through hoops to take the blame away from him. It surely happened but I doubt anyone took it explicitly because Trump endorsed it - they'd rather say some bs like "no one knew back then" or "covid was very dangerous and it was a tough call" or "Trump got lied to by Fauci, Gates and the CDC". Anything but blaming it on their dear leader.
They are anti-vaxx or at least "vaccine hesitant" (bs propaganda language). It takes a lot of effort and doublethink for them to resolve their allegiance to him and the hard reality of the clotshots being what they are. Luckily, cognitive dissonance is the norm these days.
100% true. Matthew 6:24 is clear on Trump:
“No one can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and love the other, or else he will be loyal to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and mammon (money)
I know that there's no point in showing this to people I argued with over the shots because they will say it was well understood there was a small risk of side effects just like any drug but still the coof was worse.
Lots of excess deaths and disabled people since 2021. What do you expect? People tripping over at the streets?
Thanks. I see I was right.
Any source beside a twitter post? I suspect they admitted to what they have in the past - "the clotshot is safe and effective, but in extremely rare occasions it kills a couple of unlucky people". Unless they admit to a lot more victims it's not even newsworthy.
I can easily imagine that after talking to you.
Whatever, have it your way. It's pointless to argue with a broken record.
Having more than two individuals together is already a society. Again, society is an abstraction - it's a bunch of individuals living and working together. Individuals form hierarchies. Those with superior firepower and cunning get on top of the others and form what we'd call a government regardless of the manner in which they govern.
I can consider CERN opening a portal to a demonic dimension, but the rest reads like old sci-fi narratives and putting AI in the equation is just bad writing. The problem is AI is not spectacular enough and it's definitely not the leap they make it sound to be. It's mostly hype.
We've been at this. Society is made up by individuals and individuals live in a society. Absent some form of government and authority, what guarantees one individual's wants and needs will be respected by the other individuals? If we both live in an anarchy why shouldn't I steal your stuff because I decided I like it and it's fair that I should own it?
Fairy tale time. They came through the portal, made a deal with the world governments and gave us AI. Of course they did, who could have predict we would have generative self-learning algorithms 10 years ago? Except... everyone involved in IT. AI is a is fake and gay because it's not intelligence, at least not in the way human intelligence works (which is through consciousness and will).
The whole confusion arises because a lot of people are stupid enough to believe they themselves are nothing but matter and electricity and their intelligence is just a complex organic algorithm called a brain. So of course it makes perfect sense that if we could replicate all the neuro-pathways and infrastructure we could built machines just like us. It's a fundamental worldview error causing this idiocy.
Wow, offering your own child to be a lab rat for big pharma for a fake disease kids never suffered from. Just wow.
So anarchy is whatever the individuals in the society choose it to be? Ok, then I'll make the case individuals in our society have made the choice (and affirm that choice every day) to have the form of government we live under.
It doesn't matter whether it's the smartest or the physically strongest that asserts their will on the rest - it's still will to power and the rest is means to an end. If authoritarian government is not antithetical to your particular definition of anarchy, then what's the argument about?
So a corporate NWO is what we should root for? Also a corporation is hierarchical and rule-based by definition.
There are no responsibilities in an anarchy - just people doing what they will, right? What he's asking is who can stop an anarchy from logically turning into a tyranny because the strongest naturally asserts themselves and assume power?
There's no free lunch. BTC falls in a similar category. All mainstream technology is controlled.
Arsenic? Mercury? Lead? Should I go on?
You're way less smart than you think you are.
btw you know they use similar method of culturing when they "isolate" the virus and sequence its genome, right? Isn't it ironic you're making fun of their method calling it out for being full of shit?
Get inside, you sound like you're stroking out from sun exposure.
That's one dedicated troll. Nothing like referencing a Lion King song to one up someone.
You mean developing poison they spray us with and put in the so called tests and vaccines which coupled with nutrient deficient and outright toxic GMO food, EMF pollution and psychological stress causes people to get sick en masse? It doesn't roll off the tongue as well as the word "virus" but truth often evades easy definitions.
Are you retarded? Have you not seen graphs having a baseline other than 0? It doesn't matter where it starts from, but what's the relative difference between before 2021 and after and what the trend is, you disingenuous shill. It's more than 50% growth since 2021.
This is official government data, it certainly wasn't created to mislead people by creating a false perception about the rate of disabilities.