This place stopped being a conspiracy forum a long time ago. It has largely turned into a bunch of Russian/QAnon shills circle jerking.
I seriously wonder how frequently some of these bot accounts start trying to shill other bots on here, without realizing they’re both bots. Seems pretty on par for Russian intel.
Cool, so what we have from you so far is (a) the CIA created and funded al-Qaeda, yet (b) they were too dumb to fly planes, so (c) we had to fake the death of their leader, even though we created their leader, because — although he was too stupid to train people to hijack planes — he was smart enough to perpetually evade U.S. intelligence agencies.
If there is a reason why people think conspiracy theorists are retards, this demonstrates it lol.
An anniversary of FLEX in Ukraine. Which is an event that seems to happen at the Kyiv embassy at least every five years.
So yeah, it’s not too surprising that a Ukrainian FLEX alumni spoke at a Ukrainian FLEX event that appears to occur on a yearly basis, lol.
Soooo, did the CIA create al-Qaeda or were they just a “terror cell that had all Saudi members who couldn't even fly planes.”
Maybe pick some consistent positions when you’re trying to push a narrative Ruski.
Yeah, that’s what happens when your leader announces that you did it, lol.
Also, 9/11 was not even close to the first (or last) time that al-Qaeda’s had attacked the U.S.
Ah, yes. The Russians that we funded and armed.
Between this and your Gulf War comment, you’re really on a roll today with your history knowledge. Been watching a bit too much TASS lately Ruski?
a 3rd world military
Lol. Iraq had the 4th largest army in the world prior to the Gulf War. It got reduced to a 3rd world military after it tried to fight the U.S.
So, yeah.
Ah, yes — FLEX. The high school foreign exchange program that some 20,000 foreigners have participated in.
Close the books boys, she’s a government agent for sure.
I don’t recall us invading Syria, Pakistan, or Libya. Afghanistan literally harbored a terror cell that repeatedly attacked the U.S. killed thousands of American civilians.
I will agree with you that we should not have been in Iraq.
The Gulf Wars would like a word.
I doubt they even get it tbh.
I strongly dislike our political parties and leadership, but the US military has an undeniable history of kicking ass in conventional warfare.
I don’t recall us trying to annex another nation in the 21st century based on the claim that they have no history and actually belong to us.
Poison pills are completely legal as long as they meet the Unocal standard, which Twitter’s clearly does. The Twitter OP is retarded and evidently has never studied a day of corporations.
Happy Passover and Easter to you all!
This community started dying months ago when Axo began banning any user that didn’t go along with the election fraud narrative.
What a total shame too. This place had actual potential for free speech at the start of it — that’s all dead now.
Russia just wants a quick land grab / puppet state. They’ll posture for WW3, but they’re clearly too inept to actually wage it.
we should just stay out of Russia’s way
That’s what we tried to do with Hitler. Didn’t really pan out too well.
Russia already has a mass conscription law, has been using conscripts in Ukraine, and started full mobilization after they started getting their asses kicked a week into their invasion.
Russia’s “declaration of war” would be a propaganda maneuver — that’s it.
Can’t wait for the Salon article titled “Debunked: 10 Reason Why the Right-Wing-Media Claim that Biden Tried to Shake the Air’s Hand is Transphobic.”
He’s not going along with their plan to cancel anyone that isn’t woke. Ergo, they want to cancel him lol.
Curious how you don’t actually attack anything in the sources — just the source itself. That’s called an ad hominem, my friend.
Also, that PDF is from the exact same organization that OP’s article cites repeatedly. Logically, your attack should apply equally to OP’s article — yet, you make no point of that. Again, curious.
Almost like your mindlessly pushing a narrative or something.
Yup, it’s from the same article . . .
. . . but it’s from a different person in the article. Your quote is from the Russian defense ministry, whereas the Russian troops were captured by the Ukrainian defense ministry.
Nice reading comprehension there Einstein.
Ah, yes. The good old “they did it too, even though we have no evidence of it and nobody reported on it at the time — just trust us bro.” Pretty weird for a user on a conspiracy forum, to be taking state-actor reporting without any extrinsic evidence at face value.
In any event, the sources clearly show that Russian troops were operating in Donbass years prior to present, which OP’s article says is not the case.
Probably the same as what can be said about users that refuse to engage in discussion and instead just call people shills, Jews, and racial slurs.