Curious how you don’t actually attack anything in the sources — just the source itself. That’s called an ad hominem, my friend.
Also, that PDF is from the exact same organization that OP’s article cites repeatedly. Logically, your attack should apply equally to OP’s article — yet, you make no point of that. Again, curious.
Almost like your mindlessly pushing a narrative or something.
Curious how you don’t actually attack anything in the sources — just the source itself. That’s called an ad hominem, my friend.
Also, that PDF is from the exact same organization that OP’s article cites repeatedly. Logically, your attack should apply equally to OP’s article — yet, you make no point of that. Again, curious.
Almost like your mindlessly pushing a narrative or something.
lmao reddit faggot speak